IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifmmat/278.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Engpässe in wissensintensiven Berufen - Reaktionen von Fachkräften und Unternehmen

Author

Listed:
  • Hoffmann, Marina
  • Schneck, Stefan
  • Schröder, Christian
  • Paschke, Max
  • Ptok, Sebastian

Abstract

Der konzeptionelle Beitrag erörtert die Zusammenhänge zwischen Engpässen in wissensintensiven Berufen, der Wahl der Erwerbsform und den strategischen Konsequenzen für KMU mit Fachkräftebedarf. Für Fachkräfte in wissensintensiven Engpassberufen ist eine selbstständige Tätigkeit mit guten Einkommensaussichten, hohem nicht-pekuniären Nutzen, geringen Investitionsrisiken und einer Vielzahl unternehmerischer Gelegenheiten verbunden. Die vermehrte Selbstständigkeit verknappt das Angebot an potenziellen Arbeitskräften weiter, insbesondere für KMU. Eine Alternative ist die Auslagerung wissensintensiver Tätigkeiten, die jedoch Abhängigkeiten in wettbewerbsentscheidenden Bereichen schafft. Vorteilhafter sind lerninduzierte Kooperationen mit Unternehmen oder Start-ups mit dem Ziel, die Ressourcen in wissensintensiven Engpassberufen zu bündeln und langfristig nutzbar zu machen.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoffmann, Marina & Schneck, Stefan & Schröder, Christian & Paschke, Max & Ptok, Sebastian, 2020. "Engpässe in wissensintensiven Berufen - Reaktionen von Fachkräften und Unternehmen," IfM-Materialien 278, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifmmat:278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/217216/1/1698037406.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Fritsch & Alexander S. Kritikos & Alina Rusakova, 2012. "Selbständigkeit in Deutschland: der Trend zeigt seit langem nach oben," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 79(4), pages 3-12.
    2. Matthias Benz & Bruno S. Frey, 2008. "Being Independent is a Great Thing: Subjective Evaluations of Self‐Employment and Hierarchy," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 75(298), pages 362-383, May.
    3. Cordes, Alexander, 2016. "Stellenbesetzung und personalpolitische Probleme in KMU: Analysen des IAB-Betriebspanels," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 7-2016, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    4. Zoltán J. Ács & Pontus Braunerhjelm & David B. Audretsch & Bo Carlsson, 2015. "The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship," Chapters, in: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, chapter 7, pages 129-144, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Audretsch, David B. & Lehmann, Erik E., 2005. "Does the Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship hold for regions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1191-1202, October.
    6. Schneck, Stefan, 2014. "Why the self-employed are happier: Evidence from 25 European countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1043-1048.
    7. Kay, Rosemarie & Suprinoviĉ, Olga & Werner, Arndt, 2010. "Deckung des Fachkräftebedarfs in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen: Situationsanalyse und Handlungsempfehlungen," IfM-Materialien 200, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    8. Burstedde, Alexander & Seyda, Susanne, 2020. "Wo Arbeitgeber besonders attraktiv sein müssen," IW-Kurzberichte 7/2020, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    9. Malin, Lydia & Jansen, Anika & Seyda, Susanne & Flake, Regina, 2019. "Fachkräfteengpässe in Unternehmen: Fachkräftesicherung in Deutschland - diese Potenziale gibt es noch," KOFA-Studien 2/2019, Kompetenzzentrum Fachkräftesicherung (KOFA), Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    10. Kihlstrom, Richard E & Laffont, Jean-Jacques, 1979. "A General Equilibrium Entrepreneurial Theory of Firm Formation Based on Risk Aversion," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 87(4), pages 719-748, August.
    11. Michael Fritsch & Alexander S. Kritikos & Alina Sorgner, 2015. "Verdienen Selbständige tatsächlich weniger als Angestellte?," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 82(7), pages 134-147.
    12. Michael Arnold & Anselm Mattes & Gert G. Wagner, 2016. "Normale Arbeitsverhältnisse sind weiterhin die Regel," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(19), pages 419-427.
    13. Welter, Friederike & May-Strobl, Eva & Wolter, Hans-Jürgen & Günterberg, Brigitte, 2014. "Mittelstand im Wandel," IfM-Materialien 232, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    14. Schasse, Ulrich & Schiller, Daniel & Leidmann, M. & Eckl, V. & Grave, Barbara S. & Kladroba, Andreas & Stenke, G., 2016. "Die Rolle von FuE-Dienstleistern im deutschen Innovationssystem," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 8-2016, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    15. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    16. Zoltan J. Acs & David B. Audretsch, 2005. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation," Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy 2005-21, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy Group.
    17. Suprinovič, Olga & Schneck, Stefan & Kay, Rosemarie, 2016. "Einmal Unternehmer, immer Unternehmer? Selbstständigkeit im Erwerbsverlauf," IfM-Materialien 248, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Welter, Friederike & Levering, Britta, 2021. "Mittelstand policy after the pandemic - for a sustainable future," Working Papers 02/21, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joern Block & Roy Thurik & Haibo Zhou, 2013. "What turns knowledge into innovative products? The role of entrepreneurship and knowledge spillovers," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 693-718, September.
    2. Mark J. O. Bagley, 2019. "Networks, geography and the survival of the firm," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 1173-1209, September.
    3. MOTOHASHI Kazuyuki & ZHAO Qiuhan, 2023. "University as a Knowledge Source of Innovation: A spatial analysis of the impact on local high-tech startup creation," Discussion papers 23027, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    4. Andrew Copus & Dimitris Skuras & Kyriaki Tsegenidi, 2006. "Innovation and Peripherality: A Comparative Study in Six EU Member Countries," ERSA conference papers ersa06p295, European Regional Science Association.
    5. João J. M. Ferreira & Cristina I. Fernandes & Sascha Kraus, 2019. "Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 181-205, February.
    6. Joana Mendonça & Christoph Grimpe, 2016. "Skills and regional entrepreneurship capital formation: a comparison between Germany and Portugal," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(6), pages 1440-1456, December.
    7. Leendertse, Jip & Schrijvers, Mirella & Stam, Erik, 2022. "Measure Twice, Cut Once: Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Metrics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    8. Enrico Santarelli & Hien Thu Tran, 2012. "Growth of Incumbent Firms and Entrepreneurship in V ietnam," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 638-666, December.
    9. Robert P. Garrett & Chao Miao & Shanshan Qian & Tae Jun Bae, 2017. "Entrepreneurial spawning and knowledge-based perspective: a meta-analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 355-378, August.
    10. José Belso-Martínez & Xavier Molina-Morales & Francisco Más-Verdú, 2011. "How cluster membership places the mediatior effect of the internal resources on the association between KIBS and the growth of new innovative firms," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1732, European Regional Science Association.
    11. Sara Amoroso & Bettina Müller, 2018. "The short-run effects of knowledge intensive greenfield FDI on new domestic entry," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 815-836, June.
    12. Audretsch, David B. & Lehmann, Erik E. & Menter, Matthias & Wirsching, Katharine, 2021. "Intrapreneurship and absorptive capacities: The dynamic effect of labor mobility," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Moriah Meyskens & Colleen Robb–Post & Jeffrey A. Stamp & Alan L. Carsrud & Paul D. Reynolds, 2010. "Social Ventures from a Resource–Based Perspective: An Exploratory Study Assessing Global Ashoka Fellows," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 661-680, July.
    14. Zoltán J. Ács & Pontus Braunerhjelm & David B. Audretsch & Bo Carlsson, 2015. "The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship," Chapters, in: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, chapter 7, pages 129-144, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Audretsch, David & Lehmann, Erik E, 2005. "Entrepreneurial Access and Absorption of Knowledge Spillovers: Strategic Board and Managerial Composition for Competitive Advan," CEPR Discussion Papers 5335, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Kuechle, Graciela, 2014. "Regional concentration of entrepreneurial activities," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 59-73.
    17. Nerine Mary George & Vinit Parida & Tom Lahti & Joakim Wincent, 2016. "A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 309-350, June.
    18. Wei, Yifan, 2022. "Regional governments and opportunity entrepreneurship in underdeveloped institutional environments: An entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    19. David Audretsch & Rosa Caiazza, 2016. "Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: cross-national analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(6), pages 1247-1259, December.
    20. Mrkajic, Boris, 2017. "Business incubation models and institutionally void environments," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 44-55.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fachkräfte; Selbstständigkeit; KMU; Unternehmensführung; Shortage of skilled labor; Self-Employment; SMEs; Outsourcing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifmmat:278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmbode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.