IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/hswwdp/142006.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Co-operative Development and Corporate Governance Structures in German Co-operatives: Problems and Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Kramer, Jost W.

Abstract

In Germany exist a large number of co-operatives that are engaged in a broad variety of business activities. Their organisational structure is determined by co-operative law and to a lesser degree by statutes or by-laws. As has been shown for German rural co-operatives by applying property rights theory the corporate governance structure as determined by law is formally still in existence, while it actually has been shifted in favour of the executive board. This has created an imbalance where on the one hand no longer any corporate governance is actually taking place while on the other hand members' interests may easily be neglected, because it is the executive board that determines the members' interests and also whether they have benefited from the cooperatives activities. In theory, suitable instruments to improve the corporate governance structure within such co-operative are the promotion plan and the promotion report as developed by Boettcher. However, for transaction cost reasons and due to the current attenuation of property rights, it is unlikely that these instruments will be implemented without outside pressure, e. g. through a change in cooperative law. A superior alternative to promotion plan and promotion report may be a combination of promotion task controlling and member oriented quality management. While such instruments would indeed improve members' ability to execute co-operative governance, managers' willingness to submit themselves to stronger governance may well be assumed to be very low. Taking into account the current distribution of property rights in big German co-operatives, managers will accept stronger governance structures only if some other incentives exist. An ongoing research project indicates that such incentives might exist in the realm of improved business opportunities due to better information about members' aims and needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Kramer, Jost W., 2006. "Co-operative Development and Corporate Governance Structures in German Co-operatives: Problems and Perspectives," Wismar Discussion Papers 14/2006, Hochschule Wismar, Wismar Business School.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hswwdp:142006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/23346/1/0614_Kramer.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boettcher Erik, 1979. "Die Problematik der Operationalisierung des Förderungsauftrages in Genossenschaften: Förderplan und Förderbericht," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 29(1), pages 198-216, January.
    2. Dülfer Eberhard, 1976. "Arbeitnehmer-Mitbestimmung in Genossenschaften aus betriebswirtschaftlicher Sicht," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 26(1), pages 302-319, April.
    3. Kramer, Jost W., 2003. "The allocation of property rights within registered co-operatives in Germany," Wismar Discussion Papers 10/2003, Hochschule Wismar, Wismar Business School.
    4. Carolsfeld Ludwig Schnorr von, 1982. "Zu den Grundfragen des Wesens der eingetragenen Genossenschaften," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 32(1), pages 1-6, September.
    5. Neumann Manfred, 1975. "Das kapitalistische Element in der modernen Genossenschaft," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 25(1), pages 32-40, January.
    6. Engelhardt Werner W., 1976. "Geschichte und Grundlagen mittelständischer Genossenschaften als Ansatzpunkte theoretischer Kooperationsanalyse," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 26(1), pages 285-301, April.
    7. Furubotn, Eirik G & Pejovich, Svetozar, 1972. "Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 1137-1162, December.
    8. Kramer, Jost W., 2003. "Fortschrittsfähigkeit gefragt: Haben die Kreditgenossenschaften als Genossenschaften eine Zukunft?," Wismar Discussion Papers 01/2003, Hochschule Wismar, Wismar Business School.
    9. Kramer, Jost W., 2003. "Entwicklung und Perspektiven der produktivgenossenschaftlichen Unternehmensform," Wismar Discussion Papers 04/2003, Hochschule Wismar, Wismar Business School.
    10. Fleischmann Gerd, 1972. "Genossenschaften und Wettbewerb," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 22(1), pages 159-174, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kramer, Jost W., 2003. "The allocation of property rights within registered co-operatives in Germany," Wismar Discussion Papers 10/2003, Hochschule Wismar, Wismar Business School.
    2. Louis Alessi, 1974. "Aneconomic analysis of government ownership and reculation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-42, September.
    3. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    4. Chaddad, Fabio & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2017. "Agency costs and organizational architecture of large corporate farms: evidence from Brazil," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 201-220.
    5. Olegas Beriozovas & Dalia Perkumienė & Mindaugas Škėma & Abdellah Saoualih & Larbi Safaa & Marius Aleinikovas, 2024. "Research Advancement in Forest Property Rights: A Thematic Review over Half a Decade Using Natural Language Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-28, September.
    6. Steven N.S. Cheung, 1989. "Privatization vs. Special Interests: The Experience of China's Economic Reforms," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 8(3), pages 585-611, Winter.
    7. Christine Pochet, 2001. "Le gouvernement de l'entreprise défaillante: étude de trente plans de continuation," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 4(2), pages 149-181, March.
    8. Carlisle Ford Runge, 1984. "Strategic Interdependence in Models of Property Rights," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(5), pages 807-813.
    9. R. Daviddi, 1994. "Privatisation in the transition to a market economy," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 47(191), pages 399-429.
    10. Kris Knox & Eric Blankmeyer & J. Stutzman, 1999. "Relative economic efficiency in Texas nursing facilities: A profit function analysis," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 23(3), pages 199-213, September.
    11. Castells-Quintana, David & del Pilar Lopez-Uribe, Maria & McDermott, Thomas K.J., 2018. "A review of adaptation to climate change through a development economics lens," Working Papers 309605, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    12. M.Ellman., 2010. "What Did The Study of The Soviet Economy Contribute to Mainstream Economics?," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 3.
    13. Chaddad, Fabio Ribas, 2006. "Investment Constraints in Agricultural Cooperatives: Theory, Evidence and Solutions," 44th Congress, July 23-27, 2006, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil 143259, Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administracao e Sociologia Rural (SOBER).
    14. N/A, 1974. "Review Section : BRUCE ACKERMAN and SUSAN ROSE-ACKERMAN, DALE W. HENDERSON, and JAMES W. SAWYER, JR. (1974) The Uncertain Search for Environmental Quality. New York: The Free Press. BARRY COMMONER (19," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 18(3), pages 536-552, September.
    15. Militiades N. Georgiou & Nicholas Kyriazis & Emmanouil M. L. Economou, 2015. "Democracy, Political Stability and Economic performance. A Panel Data Analysis," Journal of Risk & Control, Risk Market Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-18.
    16. Wang, Sen & Bogle, Tim & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2012. "Forestry and the New Institutional Economics," Working Papers 130818, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    17. Janet Kiholm Smith & Richard L. Smith, 1984. "State and Local Fiscal Policy: Implications for Property Values and Economic Growth," Public Finance Review, , vol. 12(1), pages 51-76, January.
    18. Stergios Skaperdas & Constantinos Syropoulos, 2002. "Insecure Property and the Efficiency of Exchange," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(476), pages 133-146, January.
    19. Tietze, Frank & Pieper, Thorsten & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2013. "To own or not to own: How ownership affects user innovation - An empirical study in the German rowing community," Working Papers 73, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    20. Gaetano Cuomo, 2015. "Imprese cooperative e democrazia economica," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(116), pages 5-38.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hswwdp:142006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwhwide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.