IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/hbsfof/152.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Monitoring Innovations- und Technologiepolitik (Zyklus 1): Ergebnisbericht

Author

Listed:
  • Malanowski, Norbert
  • Bachmann, Gerd
  • Hutapea, Luciana
  • Kaiser, Oliver S.
  • Knifka, Julia
  • Ratajczak, Andreas
  • Rijkers-Defrasne, Sylvie

Abstract

Innovationen und neue Technologien werden für Mitbestimmungsakteure immer wichtiger. Die Auswirkungen auf Arbeitsplätze, Arbeitsbedingungen und Qualifizierung müssen frühzeitig sondiert und bewertet werden. Das Projekt "Monitoring Innovationsund Technologiepolitik" identifiziert 15 innovationspolitische Zukunftsthemen systematisch und bewertet sie im Kontext gegenwärtiger und zukünftiger Arbeitswelten. Arbeitnehmerakteure benötigen solche wissenschaftlich fundierte Expertise, um Innovationsprozesse im Sinne der Beschäftigten zu gestalten.

Suggested Citation

  • Malanowski, Norbert & Bachmann, Gerd & Hutapea, Luciana & Kaiser, Oliver S. & Knifka, Julia & Ratajczak, Andreas & Rijkers-Defrasne, Sylvie, 2019. "Monitoring Innovations- und Technologiepolitik (Zyklus 1): Ergebnisbericht," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 152, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsfof:152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/216072/1/hbs-fofoe-wp-152-2019.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariana Mazzucato & Mario Cimoli & Giovanni Dosi & Joseph Stiglitz & Michael Landesmann & Mario Pianta & Rainer Walz & Tim Page, 2015. "Which Industrial Policy Does Europe Need?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 50(3), pages 120-155, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rijkers-Defrasne, Sylvie & von Versen, Till & Malanowski, Norbert, 2021. "Herausforderung Peer-to-Peer-Energiehandel in Deutschland: Potenziale, Herausforderungen und Ausblick," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 209, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naudé, Wim & Nagler, Paula, 2022. "The Ossified Economy: The Case of Germany, 1870-2020," IZA Discussion Papers 15607, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Nathalie Lazaric & Pasquale Tridico & Sebastiano Fadda, 2020. "Governing structural changes and sustainability through (new) institutions and organizations," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1267-1273, November.
    3. Maximilian Benner, 2019. "Industrial Policy in the EU and Its Neighbourhood: Learning from Policy Experimentation," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Gianluca Capone & Franco Malerba & Richard R. Nelson & Luigi Orsenigo & Sidney G. Winter, 2019. "History friendly models: retrospective and future perspectives," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Amélie Barbier-Gauchard & Meixing Dai & Claire Mainguy & Jamel Saadaoui & Moïse Sidiropoulos & Isabelle Terraz & Jamel Trabelsi, 2021. "Towards a more resilient European Union after the COVID-19 crisis," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(2), pages 321-348, June.
    6. Mafini Dosso & Fernando Hervas & Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2015. "5th European Conference on Corporate R&D and Innovation CONCORDi 2015. Industrial Research and Innovation: Evidence for Policy – Background Note," JRC Research Reports JRC97469, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Roberta Capello & Silvia Cerisola, 2023. "Industrial transformations and regional inequalities in Europe," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 70(1), pages 15-28, February.
    8. Wang, Jing, 2021. "Research on sustainable evolution of China's cloud manufacturing policies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    9. Matteo Lucchese & Leopoldo Nascia & Mario Pianta, 2016. "Industrial policy and technology in Italy," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 43(3), pages 233-260, September.
    10. Gianluca Pallante & Emanuele Russo & Andrea Roventini, 2020. "Does mission-oriented funding stimulate private R&D? Evidence from military R&D for US states," Working Papers hal-04097530, HAL.
    11. Vallejo, Bertha, 2015. "The emergence of parallel trajectories in the automobile industry: Environmental issues and the creation of new markets," MERIT Working Papers 2015-037, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    12. Germana Giombini & Francesco Perugini & Giuseppe Travaglini, 2017. "The productivity slowdown puzzle of European countries: a focus on Italy," Argomenti, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics, vol. 6(6), pages 1-20, January-A.
    13. Naudé, Wim & Nagler, Paula, 2017. "Technological Innovation and Inclusive Growth in Germany," IZA Discussion Papers 11194, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Walz, Rainer & Gotsch, Matthias & Gandenberger, Carsten & Peters, Anja & Günther, Edeltraud, 2017. "Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften: Stand der Transformation zu einer Green Economy," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S03/2017, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    15. Peter Schmidt, 2018. "Market failure vs. system failure as a rationale for economic policy? A critique from an evolutionary perspective," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 785-803, September.
    16. Lengyel, Imre & Lengyel, Balázs & Vas, Zsófia & Szakálné Kanó, Izabella, 2016. "Az újraiparosodás térbeli kérdőjelei Magyarországon [Territorial questions of reindustrialization in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 615-646.
    17. Antonio Andreoni & Ha-Joon Chang, 2016. "Industrial policy and the future of manufacturing," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 43(4), pages 491-502, December.
    18. Valeria Cirillo & Marta Fana & Dario Guarascio, 2017. "Labour market reforms in Italy: evaluating the effects of the Jobs Act," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 34(2), pages 211-232, August.
    19. Julia Brüggemann & Kilian Bizer, 2016. "Laboratory experiments in innovation research: a methodological overview and a review of the current literature," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Daniele Archibugi & Vitantonio Mariella, 2021. "Is a European Recovery Possible Without High-Tech Public Corporations?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 56(3), pages 160-166, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    neue Technologien; Transformation; Innovationspolitik; Technologiepolitik;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsfof:152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boeckde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.