IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/fomarb/45.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reformoptionen der Pflegeversicherung: Eine ordnungstheoretische Analyse

Author

Listed:
  • Holzkämper, Hilko

Abstract

[Einleitung ...] Im folgenden Diskussionsbeitrag werden zunächst die Grundlagen der Pflegeversicherung und deren Reformnotwendigkeit dargestellt. Darauf folgend wird ein ordnungstheoretisches Leitbild entworfen, denn viele Gestaltungsoptionen entziehen sich einer positiven Bewertung, so dass Wertungen erforderlich sind; die Grundlagen hierfür werden dargelegt. Auf Basis des Referenzsystems werden dann vorliegende Reformansätze analysiert und bewertet. Abschließend wird ein alternatives Reformmodell dargestellt.

Suggested Citation

  • Holzkämper, Hilko, 2014. "Reformoptionen der Pflegeversicherung: Eine ordnungstheoretische Analyse," Arbeitspapiere der FOM 45, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fomarb:45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johann Eekhoff & Vera Bünnagel & Susanna Kochskämper & Kai Menzel, 2008. "Nachhaltigkeit und Effizienz für das deutsche Gesundheitssystem," Otto-Wolff-Institut Discussion Paper Series 01/2008, Otto-Wolff-Institut für Wirtschaftsordnung, Köln, Deutschland.
    2. Bieback, Karl-Jürgen, 2013. "Verfassungs- und sozialrechtliche Probleme einer Änderung der Beitragsbemessungsgrenze in der GKV," WSI Working Papers 185, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    3. Fuest, Clemens, 2007. "Sind unsere sozialen Sicherungssysteme generationengerecht?," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 07/3, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tangian, Andranik S., 2015. "Is the left-right alignment of parties outdated?," WSI Working Papers 198, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    2. Kochskämper, Susanna, 2018. "Stellungnahme zum Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung sowie dem Antrag der Abgeordneten Pia Zimmermann, Susanne Ferschl, Matthias W. Birkwald, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion DIE LINKE (BT-Drucks," IW-Reports 46/2018, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    3. Lott, Yvonne, 2015. "Costs and benefits of flexibility and autonomy in working time: The same for women and men?," WSI Working Papers 196, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    4. Keller, Berndt & Seifert, Hartmut, 2015. "Atypical forms of employment in the public sector: Are there any?," WSI Working Papers 199, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    5. Fisahn, Andreas, 2013. "Eine Bürgerversicherung ist rechtens - Eine Untersuchung zu den verfassungsrechtlichen und europarechtlichen Problemen bei der Einführung einer Bürgerversicherung in Deutschland," HSI-Working Papers 02, Hugo Sinzheimer Institute for Labour and Social Security Law (HSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    6. Krumm, Raimund & Volkert, Jürgen, 2015. "Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der politischen Realisierbarkeit intra- und intergenerativer Gerechtigkeit," UFZ Discussion Papers 11/2015, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    7. Lott, Yvonne, 2014. "Working time autonomy and time adequacy: What if performance is all that counts?," WSI Working Papers 188, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fomarb:45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fommmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.