IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/fisisi/s092016.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die Emergenz (geteilter) Führungsstrukturen: Konzeptionelle Überlegungen zur sozialen Fundierung von Hierarchiegenese

Author

Listed:
  • Roth, Philip

Abstract

In diesem Beitrag werden die konzeptionellen Grundlagen für die Weiterentwicklung der Forschung zur geteilten Führung erarbeitet. Dazu werden zunächst die konzeptionellen Grundlagen und wesentliche empirische Erkenntnisse dieses Forschungsprogramms dargestellt und dabei verdeutlicht, weshalb die Erforschung der Emergenz von Führungsstrukturen besondere Anstrengungen rechtfertigt. Im Anschluss daran wird aufgezeigt, dass aus der Art und Weise, wie die Emergenz von Führung gegenwärtig gedacht und erforscht wird, die systematische Vernachlässigung für ihre Erklärung zentraler Dimensionen folgt. Ausgangspunkte für die notwendige Perspektiverweiterung und ihre konzeptionellen Implikationen sind dazu erstens eine inhaltlich und zeitlich erweiterte netzwerkanalytischen Kontextualisierung der Emergenz von Führung und zweitens eine kulturalistische Konzeption des Gegenstandes. Abschließend werden methodologische Implikationen der konzeptionellen Verschiebungen aufzeigen.

Suggested Citation

  • Roth, Philip, 2016. "Die Emergenz (geteilter) Führungsstrukturen: Konzeptionelle Überlegungen zur sozialen Fundierung von Hierarchiegenese," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S09/2016, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s092016
    DOI: 10.24406/publica-fhg-298194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/149561/1/877636656.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24406/publica-fhg-298194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manuel E. Sosa, 2011. "Where Do Creative Interactions Come From? The Role of Tie Content and Social Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leif Brändle & Helen Signer & Andreas Kuckertz, 2023. "Socioeconomic status and entrepreneurial networking responses to the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 111-147, January.
    2. Daniel Tzabbar & Alex Vestal, 2015. "Bridging the Social Chasm in Geographically Distributed R&D Teams: The Moderating Effects of Relational Strength and Status Asymmetry on the Novelty of Team Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 811-829, June.
    3. Na Liu & Jiancheng Guan, 2015. "Dynamic evolution of collaborative networks: evidence from nano-energy research in China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 1895-1919, March.
    4. Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2011. "Fluid Tasks and Fluid Teams: The Impact of Diversity in Experience and Team Familiarity on Team Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 310-328, July.
    5. Yohannes Mekonnen Yesuf & Demis Alamirew Getahun & Asemamaw Tilahun Debas, 2024. "Determinants of employees’ creativity: modeling the mediating role of organizational motivation to innovate," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Alessandra Tognazzo & Paola Angela Maria Mazzurana, 2017. "Friends doing business. An Explorative Longitudinal Case Study of Creativity and Innovation in an Italian Technology-Based Start-Up," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(2), pages 77-103.
    7. Wenjing Cai & Svetlana Khapova & Bart Bossink & Evgenia Lysova & Jing Yuan, 2020. "Optimizing Employee Creativity in the Digital Era: Uncovering the Interactional Effects of Abilities, Motivations, and Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Massimo Maoret & Marco Tortoriello & Daniela Iubatti, 2020. "Big Fish, Big Pond? The Joint Effect of Formal and Informal Core/Periphery Positions on the Generation of Incremental Innovations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1538-1559, November.
    9. Wisal Ahmad & Mark Stufhaut & Nancy Johnson, 2016. "Domain Knowledge and Team Creativity: A Typological View," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 8(2), pages 55-66, October.
    10. Mohsen Jafari Songhori & Madjid Tavana & Takao Terano, 2020. "Product development team formation: effects of organizational- and product-related factors," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 88-122, March.
    11. Jorge Walter & Daniel Z. Levin & J. Keith Murnighan, 2015. "Reconnection Choices: Selecting the Most Valuable (vs. Most Preferred) Dormant Ties," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1447-1465, October.
    12. Tai-Wei Chang & Cheng-Ze Hung, 2021. "How to Shape the Employees’ Organization Sustainable Green Knowledge Sharing: Cross-Level Effect of Green Organizational Identity Effect on Green Management Behavior and Performance of Members," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Dey, Bidit L. & Nasef, Youssef Tarek & Brown, David M & Samuel, Lalnunpuia & Singh, Pallavi & Apostolidis, Chrysostomos, 2023. "(Im)migrants’ appropriation of culture: Reciprocal influence of personal and work contexts," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(2).
    14. Farooq Ahmad & Md Billal Hossain & Khurram Mustafa & Faisal Ejaz & Kausar Fiaz Khawaja & Anna Dunay, 2023. "Green HRM Practices and Knowledge Sharing Improve Environmental Performance by Raising Employee Commitment to the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Luke Rhee & Paul M. Leonardi, 2018. "Which pathway to good ideas? An attention‐based view of innovation in social networks," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 1188-1215, April.
    16. Smith, Natalie L. & Green, B. Christine, 2020. "Examining the factors influencing organizational creativity in professional sport organizations," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 992-1004.
    17. Sullivan, Diane M. & Marvel, Matthew R. & Wolfe, Marcus T., 2021. "With a little help from my friends? How learning activities and network ties impact performance for high tech startups in incubators," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Bilitis Schoonjans & Philippe Cauwenberge & Heidi Bauwhede, 2013. "Formal business networking and SME growth," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 169-181, June.
    19. Céline Flipo & Pier Vittorio Mannucci & Kevyn Yong, 2023. "The impact of cultural tightness on the relationship between structural holes, tie strength, and creativity," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(2), pages 332-343, March.
    20. Shuning Zhang & Yannan Li & Ahreum Hong, 2025. "The Impact of Green Inclusive Leadership on Green Innovation in Chinese SMEs: The Mediating Roles of Green Knowledge Sharing and Green Organizational Identity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Emergenz von Führungsstrukturen; Geteilte Führung; Social Exchange Theory; Soziale Netzwerk Analyse; Praxistheorie;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s092016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isfhgde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.