IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/268211.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Anmerkungen zum Wissensproblem in der Wettbewerbspolitik - Beitrag für das 19. Hohenheimer Oberseminar am 15./16.11.2002

Author

Listed:
  • Christiansen, Arndt

Abstract

Aus der Marktprozesstheorie der Österreichischen Schule 1 werden in dieser Arbeit bestimmte Beschränkungen des für die Wettbewerbspolitik verfügbaren Wissens abgeleitet und die damit verbundenen Probleme aufgezeigt. Zugleich findet eine Auseinandersetzung mit der Marktprozesstheorie und den daraus zu ziehenden wettbewerbspolitischen Konsequenzen statt. Dies soll sich nicht auf die theoretische Ebene beschränken, sondern es soll davon ausgehend ein Bezug zur wettbewerbspolitischen Praxis mittels aktueller Beispiele hergestellt werden. Damit verbindet sich das Anliegen, die aus der theoretischen Analyse gewonnenen Erkenntnisse zumindest ansatzweise zur Ableitung und Beurteilung konkreter Handlungsempfehlungen anzuwenden. 2 Im ersten Teil der Arbeit werden zunächst die theoretischen Grundlagen der spezifisch österreichischen Sicht auf Markt und Wettbewerb dargelegt (Abschnitt 2.1). Anschließend werden die entsprechende normative Position und insbesondere die wettbewerbspolitische Anwendung erörtert (Abschnitt 2.2). Daraus ergibt sich das Wissensproblem als zentraler Bezugspunkt der weiteren Ausführungen. Im zweiten Teil der Arbeit werden daher zum einen dessen empirische Evidenz und zum anderen Möglichkeiten des konstruktiven Umgangs damit aufgezeigt (Abschnitte 3.1 und 3.2), bevor ein Fazit gezogen wird (Abschnitt 4).

Suggested Citation

  • Christiansen, Arndt, 2002. "Anmerkungen zum Wissensproblem in der Wettbewerbspolitik - Beitrag für das 19. Hohenheimer Oberseminar am 15./16.11.2002," EconStor Preprints 268211, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:268211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/268211/1/Christiansen_Anmerkungen_zum_Wissensproblem.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sherwin Rosen, 1997. "Austrian and Neoclassical Economics: Any Gains from Trade?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 139-152, Fall.
    2. Littlechild, S. C. & Owen, G., 1980. "An Austrian model of the entrepreneurial market process," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 361-379, December.
    3. Lawrence White, 2001. "Lysine and Price Fixing: How Long? How Severe?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 18(1), pages 23-31, February.
    4. Vaughn, Karen I, 1980. "Economic Calculation under Socialism: The Austrian Contribution," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 18(4), pages 535-554, October.
    5. Buchanan, James M. & Vanberg, Viktor J., 1991. "The Market as a Creative Process," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 167-186, October.
    6. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226320625 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Israel Kirzner, 1999. "Creativity and/or Alertness: A Reconsideration of the Schumpeterian Entrepreneur," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 5-17, January.
    8. Israel M. Kirzner, 1997. "Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 35(1), pages 60-85, March.
    9. Kirzner, Israel M, 1999. "Creativity and/or Alertness: A Reconsideration of the Schumpeterian Entrepreneur," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 11(1-2), pages 5-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269, December.
    2. Steffen Korsgaard & Henrik Berglund & Claus Thrane & Per Blenker, 2016. "A Tale of Two Kirzners: Time, Uncertainty, and the “Nature†of Opportunities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(4), pages 867-889, July.
    3. Berg, Nathan, 2014. "Success from satisficing and imitation: Entrepreneurs' location choice and implications of heuristics for local economic development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1700-1709.
    4. James Lee Caton, 2019. "Creativity in a theory of entrepreneurship," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(4), pages 442-469, September.
    5. Lanivich, Stephen E. & Smith, Adam & Levasseur, Ludvig & Pidduck, Robert J. & Busenitz, Lowell & Tang, Jintong, 2022. "Advancing entrepreneurial alertness: Review, synthesis, and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1165-1176.
    6. Daniel L. Bennett, 2021. "Local economic freedom and creative destruction in America," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 333-353, January.
    7. Welter, Friederike & May-Strobl, Eva & Wolter, Hans-Jürgen & Günterberg, Brigitte, 2014. "Mittelstand im Wandel," IfM-Materialien 232, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    8. Ferlito, Carmelo, 2015. "Entrepreneurship: State of grace or human action?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(1-2), pages 11-36.
    9. Fellnhofer, Katharina, 2022. "Entrepreneurial alertness toward responsible research and innovation: Digital technology makes the psychological heart of entrepreneurship pound," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Giandomenica Becchio, 2018. "Gender, Feminist and Heterodox Economics: Interconnections and Differences in a Historical Perspective," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 1, pages 5-24, March.
    11. Joo Y. Park & Chang Soo Sung & Il Im, 2017. "Does Social Media Use Influence Entrepreneurial Opportunity? A Review of its Moderating Role," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, September.
    12. Tomáš Otáhal, 2008. "Teorie podnikatelského objevování [Theory of entrepreneurial discovery]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(5), pages 669-683.
    13. Pál Czeglédi, 2017. "Productivity, institutions, and market beliefs: three entrepreneurial interpretations," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(2), pages 164-180, August.
    14. Trofimov, Ivan, 2017. "Entrepreneurship and policy dynamics: a theoretical framework," MPRA Paper 79497, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Gordon E. Shockley & Peter M. Frank, 2011. "The functions of government in social entrepreneurship: theory and preliminary evidence," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(3), pages 181-198, August.
    16. Virgil Henry Storr & Stefanie Haeffele-Balch & Laura E. Grube, 2015. "Community Revival in the Wake of Disaster," Perspectives from Social Economics, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-31489-5, June.
    17. Raymond J. March & Adam G. Martin & Audrey Redford, 2016. "The substance of entrepreneurship and the entrepreneurship of substances," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 201-220, August.
    18. Aloña Martiarena, 2013. "What’s so entrepreneurial about intrapreneurs?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 27-39, January.
    19. Turan Yay & Gülsün G. Yay & Tolga Aksoy, 2018. "Impact of institutions on entrepreneurship: a panel data analysis," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(1), pages 131-160, April.
    20. Ludvig Levasseur & Jintong Tang & Masoud Karami & Lowell Busenitz & K. Michele Kacmar, 2022. "Increasing alertness to new opportunities: the influence of positive affect and implications for innovation," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 27-49, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Wettbewerbspolitik;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:268211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.