IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/22073.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Erfolgsfaktoren des Kostenmanagements: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung

Author

Listed:
  • Himme, Alexander

Abstract

Kostenmanagement ist konzeptionell in breiter Form untersucht worden. Ergänzend dazu sind einige empirische Beiträge vorzufinden, die insbesondere die Verbreitung und Ausgestaltung verschiedener Kostenmanagement-Instrumente (z. B. Target Costing) und methodische Aspekte (z. B. Formen der Kostenplanung) untersucht haben. Konzeptionell wird darauf hingewiesen, dass Kostenmanagement nur dann erfolgreich sein kann, wenn auf das Verhalten der Betroffenen entsprechend eingewirkt und Widerständen gegenüber Veränderungen entgegengewirkt wird. Die vorliegende empirische Untersuchung kommt zu dem Ergebnis, dass insbesondere dem Engagement des Top Managements und der Partizipation der Betroffenen eine zentrale Bedeutung für den Erfolg des Kostenmanagements zukommt.

Suggested Citation

  • Himme, Alexander, 2008. "Erfolgsfaktoren des Kostenmanagements: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung," EconStor Preprints 22073, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:22073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/22073/1/Kostenmanagement_Erfolgsfaktoren.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Schwaninger & Christian Kaiser, 2007. "Erfolgsfaktoren organisatorischen Wandels," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 150-172, March.
    2. Stock, Ruth, 2005. "Erfolgsfaktoren von Teams: Eine Analyse direkter und indirekter Effekte," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 60482, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Utz Schäffer & Michael Zyder, 2007. "Eine Analyse des moderierenden Einflusses der Faktoren Wettbewerbsintensität, Marktdynamik und dezentrale Autonomie auf die erfolgreiche Gestaltung der Budgetierung," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 7-33, April.
    4. Waterhouse, J. H. & Tiessen, P., 1978. "A contingency framework for management accounting systems research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 65-76, February.
    5. Stock, Ruth, 2005. "Erfolgsfaktoren von Teams: Eine Analyse direkter und indirekter Effekte," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 35544, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait & Arkadiusz Babczuk, 2022. "Can the Economic Value Added Be Used as the Universal Financial Metric?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Reid, Gavin C. & Smith, Julia A., 2009. "A coevolutionary analysis of organisational systems and processes: Quantitative applications to information system dynamics in small entrepreneurial firms," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 762-781.
    3. Pascal Langevin & Thierry Picq, 2001. "Controle Des Equipes Virtuelles : Une Revue," Post-Print halshs-00584636, HAL.
    4. Shih-Chu Chou & Ramachandran Natarajan & Kenneth Zheng, 2022. "Conglomerate internal informational advantage and resource allocation efficiency," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 717-748, August.
    5. Chow, Chee W. & Kato, Yutaka & Merchant, Kenneth A., 1996. "The use of organizational controls and their effects on data manipulation and management myopia: A Japan vs U.S. comparison," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(2-3), pages 175-192.
    6. Nava Subramaniam & Neal M. Ashkanasy, 2001. "The Effect of Organisational Culture Perceptions on the Relationship Between Budgetary Participation and Managerial Job-Related Outcomes," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 26(1), pages 35-54, June.
    7. Christian Daumoser & Bernhard Hirsch & Matthias Sohn, 2018. "Honesty in budgeting: a review of morality and control aspects in the budgetary slack literature," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 115-159, August.
    8. Carol A. Adams & Carlos Larrinaga‐González, 2007. "Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 333-355, June.
    9. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F., 2001. "Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 349-410, December.
    10. Lucianetti, Lorenzo & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Latan, Hengky, 2018. "Contingency factors and complementary effects of adopting advanced manufacturing tools and managerial practices: Effects on organizational measurement systems and firms' performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 318-328.
    11. Marco Gatti & Maria Serena Chiucchi, 2017. "Context matters - Il ruolo del contesto negli studi di controllo di gestione," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(3), pages 5-10.
    12. Teerooven Soobaroyen & Bhagtaraj Poorundersing, 2008. "The effectiveness of management accounting systems: Evidence from functional managers in a developing country," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(2), pages 187-219, January.
    13. Milena Vainieri & Cristiana Bettelli & Antonella Rosa & Claudio Travaglini, 2014. "Strutture residenziali fra scelte strategiche e sostenibilit? economica. Spunti di riflessioni da evidenze empiriche," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(92), pages 101-118.
    14. Ferdinand A. Gul & William Glen & Alan Ruguang Huang, 1993. "The Effects of Environmental Uncertainty, Computer Usage, and Management Accounting Systems on Small Business," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 2(3), pages 251-271, Summer.
    15. Prem Lal Joshi & Wayne G. Bremser & Ashutosh Deshmukh & Rajesh Kumar, 2011. "Diffusion of Management Accounting Practices in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 23-53, March.
    16. Nuswantara Dian Anita & Maulidi Ach & Pujiono, 2017. "The efficacy of control environment as fraud deterrence in local government," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(4), pages 591-613, December.
    17. Granlund, Markus & Lukka, Kari, 2017. "Investigating highly established research paradigms: Reviving contextuality in contingency theory based management accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 63-80.
    18. Ditillo, Angelo, 2004. "Dealing with uncertainty in knowledge-intensive firms: the role of management control systems as knowledge integration mechanisms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3-4), pages 401-421.
    19. Cadez, Simon & Guilding, Chris, 2008. "An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 836-863.
    20. katia Corsi & Daniela Mancini, 2015. "Regulatory compliance of financial control systems and its implications for accountants. Some evidence from Italian experience," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(3), pages 65-91.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:22073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.