IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/efisdi/142009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Auswirkungen der Organisation und der Außenorientierung von Dienstleistungen auf Innovationen

Author

Listed:
  • Lay, Gunter
  • Brandt, Tasso
  • Maloca, Spomenka
  • Schröter, Marcus
  • Stahlecker, Thomas

Abstract

Innovationen sind ein zentrales Element zur Erhaltung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit Deutschlands in einer globalisierten Weltwirtschaft. Waren die Innovationsanstrengungen von Wirtschaft und Politik in der Vergangenheit vorrangig darauf ausgerichtet, auf Forschung und Entwicklung basierende technologische Produktinnovationen voranzubringen, so hat sich mittlerweile die Erkenntnis durchgesetzt, dass ein breiteres Innovationsverständnis vonnöten ist: Prozessinnovationen, organisatorische Innovationen und Dienstleistungsinnovationen sind Innovationsfelder, die in der Innovationsforschung zunehmend Beachtung finden. Insbesondere Dienstleistungsinnovationen sind dabei in ihrem Zustandekommen und in ihren Wirkungsweisen jedoch noch keineswegs hinreichend untersucht. Vor diesem Hintergrund hat die Expertenkommission "Forschung und Innovation (EFI)" in ihrem ersten Gutachten (2008) vorgeschlagen, die Erforschung innovativer Dienstleistungen zu forcieren. Einen Beitrag hierzu will die vorliegende, von der EFI Kommission in Auftrag gegebene explorative Studie leisten.

Suggested Citation

  • Lay, Gunter & Brandt, Tasso & Maloca, Spomenka & Schröter, Marcus & Stahlecker, Thomas, 2009. "Auswirkungen der Organisation und der Außenorientierung von Dienstleistungen auf Innovationen," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 14-2009, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:efisdi:142009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/156528/1/StuDIS_2009-14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Attila Varga & Hans Schalk, 2004. "Knowledge Spillovers, Agglomeration and Macroeconomic Growth: An Empirical Approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 977-989.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schasse, Ulrich & Schiller, Daniel & Leidmann, M. & Eckl, V. & Grave, Barbara S. & Kladroba, Andreas & Stenke, G., 2016. "Die Rolle von FuE-Dienstleistern im deutschen Innovationssystem," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 8-2016, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. G. Page West III & Charles E. Bamford & Jesse W. Marsden, 2008. "Contrasting Entrepreneurial Economic Development in Emerging Latin American Economies: Applications and Extensions of Resource-Based Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(1), pages 15-36, January.
    2. Christos Genakos & Ioannis Kaplanis & Maria Theano Tagaraki & Aggelos Tsakanikas, 2023. "Firm Resilience and Growth during the Economics Crisis: lessons from the Greek depression," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 186, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    3. Roberta Capello & Camilla Lenzi, 2015. "Una valutazione della rilevanza e utilit? delle politiche di Ricerca e sviluppo tecnologico dell?Unione Europea," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(3 Suppl.), pages 13-36.
    4. Varga, Attila & Sebestyén, Tamás, 2015. "Innováció Kelet-Közép-Európában. Az EU keretprogramjaiban való részvétel szerepe az innovációs teljesítményben [Innovation in Central East Europe. The role played in innovation performance by parti," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 881-908.
    5. André Stel & Kashifa Suddle, 2008. "The impact of new firm formation on regional development in the Netherlands," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 31-47, January.
    6. Zoltán J. Ács & Colm O'Gorman & László Szerb & Siri Terjesen, 2015. "Could the Irish Miracle be Repeated in Hungary?," Chapters, in: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, chapter 30, pages 584-603, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Mikhail Martynovich, 2017. "The role of local embeddedness and non-local knowledge in entrepreneurial activity," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 741-762, December.
    8. Pamela Mueller, 2005. "Exploring the Knowledge Filter - How Entrepreneurship and University-Industry Relations Drive Economic Growth," ERSA conference papers ersa05p610, European Regional Science Association.
    9. O'Connor, Allan, 2013. "A conceptual framework for entrepreneurship education policy: Meeting government and economic purposes," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 546-563.
    10. Roberta Capello & Camilla Lenzi, 2016. "Innovation modes and entrepreneurial behavioral characteristics in regional growth," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 875-893, December.
    11. Balázs Lengyel & Tamás Sebestyén & Loet Leydesdorff, 2015. "Challenges for regional innovation policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Spatial concentration and foreign control of US patenting," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(1), pages 1-14.
    12. Ren Lu & Ruikan Zhang & Torger Reve, 2013. "Relations among Clusters in Six Chinese City Regions," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 1189-1209, August.
    13. Breandán Ó hUallacháin, 2007. "Regional Growth in a Knowledge-based Economy," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 221-248, July.
    14. Jahn, Vera & Berlemann, Michael, 2014. "Governance, Firm Size and Innovative Capacity: Regional Empirical Evidence for Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100412, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    15. Dmitry Yu. Evdokimov & Yury Yu. Ponomarev, 2022. "Development of Charging Infrastructure in the Russian Regions: A Scenario Analysis [Развитие Электрозаправочной Инфраструктуры В Регионах России: Сценарный Анализ]," Russian Economic Development, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 11, pages 59-76, November.
    16. Roberta Capello & Camilla Lenzi, 2013. "Territorial patterns of innovation: a taxonomy of innovative regions in Europe," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 51(1), pages 119-154, August.
    17. Enrico Santarelli & Marco Vivarelli, 2007. "Entrepreneurship and the process of firms’ entry, survival and growth," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 16(3), pages 455-488, June.
    18. Esteban Fernández-Vázquez, 2014. "Estimating the effect of technological factors from samples affected by collinearity: a data-weighted entropy approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 717-731, September.
    19. Roberta Capello & Camilla Lenzi, 2016. "Relevance and utility of European Union research, technological development and innovation policies for a smart growth," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(1), pages 52-72, February.
    20. Kristinn Hermannsson & Katerina Lisenkova & Patrizio Lecca & J Kim Swales & Peter G McGregor, 2014. "The Regional Economic Impact of More Graduates in the Labour Market: A ‘Micro-to-Macro’ Analysis for Scotland," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(2), pages 471-487, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:efisdi:142009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-fi.de/index.php?id=1&L=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.