IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/dzimps/307093.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A controversial investment: An industrial policy analysis of the Intel-Magdeburg subsidy based on the BESTInvest guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Gerresheim, Nils
  • Krahé, Max

Abstract

The US semiconductor company Intel is planning to build two ultra-modern chip factories near Magdeburg. This project was promised the largest industrial policy subsidy that the German government has ever approved for an individual company: almost 10 billion euros. Is this money well-spent? To answer this question, we developed guidelines for the evaluation of government investments (BESTInvest). This paper sets out these guidelines and applies them to Intel-Magdeburg. Our conclusion is that the subsidy is controversial. Although learning curve-, cluster- and innovation effects can create path dependencies in semiconductor production, there are uncertainties surrounding the size of these effects, and the impact of a single subsidy is likely to be moderate. Accordingly, it remains unclear whether the support would suffice to make Intel-Magdeburg competitive in the long term. In addition, relatively few jobs would be created, in a local labour market where there is currently a shortage of skilled workers. This calls into question the effects of the project on the regional and wider economy. In addition to economic factors, there are also relevant climate and sovereignty factors, which are positive but moderate. The over-all assessment therefore depends on the respective weights given to individual factors, as well as, if necessary, on the willingness to promote cluster formation and the competitiveness of the semiconductor industry in Germany and Magdeburg with further measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerresheim, Nils & Krahé, Max, 2024. "A controversial investment: An industrial policy analysis of the Intel-Magdeburg subsidy based on the BESTInvest guidelines," Papers 307093, Dezernat Zukunft - Institute for Macrofinance, Berlin.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:dzimps:307093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/307093/1/1909904805.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peters, Bettina & Hud, Martin & Köhler, Christian & Licht, Georg, 2012. "Ökonomische Bewertung von staatlichen Investitionen in Forschung und Innovation," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 15-2012, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    2. Chen, Shimin & Sun, Zheng & Tang, Song & Wu, Donghui, 2011. "Government intervention and investment efficiency: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 259-271, April.
    3. Haag, Maike & Kempermann, Hanno & Kohlisch, Enno & Koppel, Oliver, 2023. "Innovationsatlas 2023: Die Innovationskraft der deutschen Regionen," IW-Analysen, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute, volume 127, number 153.
    4. Deng, Lu & Jiang, Ping & Li, Sifei & Liao, Mingqing, 2020. "Government intervention and firm investment," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerresheim, Nils & Krahé, Max, 2024. "Zurecht umstritten: Eine industriepolitische Analyse der Intel-Magdeburg Subvention anhand des BESTInvest-Leitfadens," Papers 303198, Dezernat Zukunft - Institute for Macrofinance, Berlin.
    2. Lu, Yao & Zhan, Shuwei & Zhan, Minghua, 2024. "Has FinTech changed the sensitivity of corporate investment to interest rates?—Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Rongda Chen & Jingjing Yu & Chenglu Jin & Xinyang Chen & Liu Yang & Shuonan Zhang, 2024. "Political connection and credit risk of real estate enterprises: evidence from stock market," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Luo, Kun & Lim, Edwin KiaYang & Qu, Wen & Zhang, Xuan, 2021. "Board cultural diversity, government intervention and corporate innovation effectiveness: Evidence from China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    5. Xu, Chang & Jin, Long, 2024. "Effects of government digitalization on firm investment efficiency: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 819-834.
    6. Teklay, Belaynesh & Yu, Wei & Zhu, Keying, 2024. "The effect of superstitious beliefs on corporate investment efficiency: evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1434-1447.
    7. Huang, Ke & Zhu, Ying, 2022. "China’s secondary privatization and corporate investment efficiency," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Jin, Ling & Li, Zhisheng & Lu, Lei & Ni, Xiaoran, 2023. "Does stock market rescue affect investment efficiency in the real sector?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Bole Zhou & Jing Ge & Pengfei Ge, 2023. "Political connections and labor investment efficiency: Evidence from China's private firms," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 696-717, November.
    10. Xiao, Bingyu & Gong, Guangming & Xiao, Liang, 2024. "Regulators' work experience at local companies and SOEs' investment efficiency: Evidence from provincial SASAC leaders," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Hou, Guangwen & Feng, Chenyang, 2024. "Innovation-driven policy and firm investment," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    12. Chen, Haiqiang & Lin, Zhe, 2024. "Local fiscal pressure and shadow banking activities of nonfinancial enterprises–A story of government intervention," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    13. Zhu, Huaijia & Chang, Shiwei & Chen, Bo & Zhu, Huaiqi, 2024. "How does military-civilian integration development influence corporate financial constraints in China? Evidence based on quasi-natural experiments," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1273-1289.
    14. Liu, Jianhua & Liu, Jingjun & Tang, Zhenyang & Xu, Yue, 2024. "Provincial economic growth and firm excess investment: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    15. Li, Mingming & Liu, Haiming & Chiang, Yao-Min, 2022. "Government intervention, leverage adjustment, and firm performance: Evidence from defaulting firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    16. Ren, Meixu & Zhao, Jinxuan & Zhao, Jingmei, 2023. "The crowding-out effect of zombie companies on fixed asset investment: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Zhao, Lingxiao & Liu, Xiao & Tang, Yunpeng & Zhang, Wenjing, 2024. "Functional subsidies, selective subsidies and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    18. Li, Xiaoxia & Cai, Guilong & Lin, Bingxuan & Luo, Danglun, 2024. "Macroeconomic data manipulation and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    19. Ma, Xiaofang & Chen, Jun & Dong, Wang & Su, Qiaoling, 2024. "Chief accountants weigh in: How professional leadership of SOEs influence investment efficiency," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    20. Jiang, Lunan & Chen, Yinghui & Zhang, Lin, 2024. "Monetary policy shocks and firm investment decisions: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    intel-magdeburg; semiconductors; industrialpolicy;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:dzimps:307093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.dezernatzukunft.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.