IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cexwps/305250.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ausmaß, Ursachen und Folgen der Überlastung der öffentlichen Verwaltung in Baden-Württemberg und Rheinland-Pfalz

Author

Listed:
  • Thomann, Eva
  • Gómez Díaz, Jana
  • Dieterich, Jonas
  • Suhner, Dominik
  • Selensky, Michelle
  • Griem, Jannis

Abstract

Der vorliegende Auswertungsbericht präsentiert die Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Online-Verwaltungsumfrage in den Bundesländern Baden-Württemberg (N=676) und Rheinland-Pfalz (N=211), welche vom Südwestrundfunk unter der wissenschaftlichen Anleitung der Arbeitsgruppe Verwaltungswissenschaft der Universität Konstanz im ersten Quartal des Jahres 2024 durchgeführt wurde. Ziel der Umfrage war es, das Ausmaß, die Ursachen und Folgen einer möglichen Überlastung der öffentlichen Verwaltung aus Sicht der Behörden zu erforschen. Hierzu wurden sechs Arten von Behörden insgesamt 32 standardisierte Fragen gestellt: Bürgerbüros, Ausländerbehörden, Sozialämtern, Baubehörden, Jugendämtern und Kfz- Zulassungsstellen. Der Schlussbericht präsentiert deskriptive statistische Ergebnisse zur Beantwortung von vier übergreifenden Fragen, welche im Folgenden kurz zusammengefasst werden. [...]

Suggested Citation

  • Thomann, Eva & Gómez Díaz, Jana & Dieterich, Jonas & Suhner, Dominik & Selensky, Michelle & Griem, Jannis, 2024. "Ausmaß, Ursachen und Folgen der Überlastung der öffentlichen Verwaltung in Baden-Württemberg und Rheinland-Pfalz," Working Papers 40, University of Konstanz, Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality. Perceptions, Participation and Policies".
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cexwps:305250
    DOI: 10.48787/kops/352-2-chk7xycs1hg27
    Note: Eine Studie der Arbeitsgruppe für Verwaltungswissenschaft der Universität Konstanz in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Südwestrundfunk (Schlussbericht).
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/305250/1/1906512027.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.48787/kops/352-2-chk7xycs1hg27?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam,Christian & Hurka,Steffen & Knill,Christoph & Steinebach,Yves, 2019. "Policy Accumulation and the Democratic Responsiveness Trap," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108481199, September.
    2. Fernández-I-Marín, Xavier & Knill, Christoph & Steinbacher, Christina & Steinebach, Yves, 2024. "Bureaucratic Quality and the Gap between Implementation Burden and Administrative Capacities," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(3), pages 1240-1260, August.
    3. Donald Moynihan, 2022. "Delegitimization, Deconstruction and Control: Undermining the Administrative State," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 699(1), pages 36-49, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mauricio I. Dussauge-Laguna, 2022. "The promises and perils of populism for democratic policymaking: the case of Mexico," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(4), pages 777-803, December.
    2. Charlotte Burns & Paul Tobin, 2020. "Crisis, Climate Change and Comitology: Policy Dismantling Via the Backdoor?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 527-544, May.
    3. Matt Andrews, 2021. "Successful Failure in Public Policy Work," CID Working Papers 402, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    4. Christoph Knill & Yves Steinebach, 2022. "Crises as driver of policy accumulation: Regulatory change and ratcheting in German asylum policies between 1975 and 2019," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 603-617, April.
    5. Gilad, Sharon & Sulitzeanu-Kenan, Raanan & Levi-Faur, David, 2024. "Partisan Alignment and the Propensity to Choose a Job in a Government Ministry," SocArXiv ufzcj, Center for Open Science.
    6. Lawrence R. Jacobs & Judd Choate, 2022. "Democratic Capacity: Election Administration as Bulwark and Target," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 699(1), pages 22-35, January.
    7. Steffen Hurka & Maximilian Haag, 2020. "Policy complexity and legislative duration in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(1), pages 87-108, March.
    8. Jan Pollex, 2022. "Simultaneous Policy Expansion and Reduction? Tracing Dismantling in the Context of Experimentalist Governance in European Union Environmental Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 604-633, May.
    9. Thomas Bolognesi & Florence Metz & Stéphane Nahrath, 2021. "Institutional complexity traps in policy integration processes: a long-term perspective on Swiss flood risk management," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 911-941, December.
    10. Jesper Dahl Kelstrup & Jonas Videbæk Jørgensen, 2024. "Explaining differences in research utilization in evidence-based government ministries," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(2), pages 257-280, June.
    11. Kris Hartley & Michael Howlett, 2021. "Policy Assemblages and Policy Resilience: Lessons for Non-Design from Evolutionary Governance Theory," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 451-459.
    12. Steffen Hurka & Christoph Knill, 2020. "Does regulation matter? A cross‐national analysis of the impact of gun policies on homicide and suicide rates," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 787-803, October.
    13. Yves Steinebach, 2022. "Instrument choice, implementation structures, and the effectiveness of environmental policies: A cross‐national analysis," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 225-242, January.
    14. Markus Hinterleitner & Fritz Sager, 2022. "Policy’s role in democratic conflict management," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(2), pages 239-254, June.
    15. Christina Steinbacher, 2024. "The pursuit of welfare efficiency: when institutional structures turn ‘less’ into ‘more’," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(2), pages 353-378, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cexwps:305250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.exc.uni-konstanz.de/en/inequality/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.