IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/bayism/68.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Welche Zukunft hat die Blockchain-Technologie in der Energiewirtschaft?

Author

Listed:
  • Bogensperger, Alexander
  • Zeiselmair, Andreas
  • Hinterstocker, Michael
  • Dossow, Patrick
  • Hilpert, Johannes
  • Wimmer, Maximilian
  • von Gneisenau, Carsten
  • Klausmann, Nikolas
  • Strüker, Jens
  • Urbach, Nils
  • Schellinger, Benjamin
  • Sedlmeir, Johannes
  • Völter, Fabiane

Abstract

Die Blockchain-Technologie erfuhr die Spitze ihres ersten großen Hypes im Jahr 2017. Bei der Blockchain-Technologie handelt es sich um ein dezentrales elektronisches Register für digitale Transaktionen. Zu den Eigenschaften der Technologie zählen u. a. eine hohe Manipulationsresistenz, welche Vertrauen in digitale Daten erzeugen kann, sowie die Möglichkeit, Prozesse und Transaktionen, ohne Intermediär abzuwickeln. Diese besonderen Eigenschaften ermöglichen die Entstehung eines "Internets der Werte". Während Kryptowährungen den bekanntesten Anwendungsfall darstellen (oft auch "digitale Währungen" oder "Krypto-Token" genannt), sind seit der Einführung der Technologie im Jahr 2008 viele weitere Anwendungsfälle diskutiert worden. Dabei bietet sich die Technologie nicht als Universallösung für jegliche Problemstellungen an. Das nachfolgende Diskussionspapier soll aufzeigen, in welchen Branchen sich die Technologie bereits etabliert hat, welche allgemeinen Missverständnisse die Technologie umgeben und wo ihre energiewirtschaftlichen Einsatzmöglichkeiten liegen. Zudem soll aufgezeigt werden, welche technologieunabhängigen Hürden den Einsatz der Technologie erschweren.

Suggested Citation

  • Bogensperger, Alexander & Zeiselmair, Andreas & Hinterstocker, Michael & Dossow, Patrick & Hilpert, Johannes & Wimmer, Maximilian & von Gneisenau, Carsten & Klausmann, Nikolas & Strüker, Jens & Urbach, 2021. "Welche Zukunft hat die Blockchain-Technologie in der Energiewirtschaft?," Bayreuth Reports on Information Systems Management 68, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Information Systems Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:bayism:68
    DOI: 10.15495/EPub_UBT_00005707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/237670/1/1767073569.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15495/EPub_UBT_00005707?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johannes Sedlmeir & Hans Ulrich Buhl & Gilbert Fridgen & Robert Keller, 2020. "The Energy Consumption of Blockchain Technology: Beyond Myth," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(6), pages 599-608, December.
    2. de Reuver, Mark & Sørensen, Carsten & Basole, Rahul C., 2018. "The digital platform: a research agenda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 80669, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Carliss Y. Baldwin & C. Jason Woodard, 2009. "The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View," Chapters, in: Annabelle Gawer (ed.), Platforms, Markets and Innovation, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dolata, Ulrich, 2024. "Industry platforms: A new mode of coordination in the economy," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2024-02, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    2. Brunswicker, Sabine & Schecter, Aaron, 2019. "Coherence or flexibility? The paradox of change for developers’ digital innovation trajectory on open platforms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    3. Saadatmand, Fatemeh & Lindgren, Rikard & Schultze, Ulrike, 2019. "Configurations of platform organizations: Implications for complementor engagement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    4. Brea, Edgar, 2023. "A framework for mapping actor roles and their innovation potential in digital ecosystems," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Veile, Johannes W. & Schmidt, Marie-Christin & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2022. "Toward a new era of cooperation: How industrial digital platforms transform business models in Industry 4.0," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 387-405.
    6. Cenamor, Javier, 2021. "Complementor competitive advantage: A framework for strategic decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 335-343.
    7. Dolata, Ulrich, 2023. "Industrieplattformen: Eine neue Form der Handlungskoordination in der Wirtschaft," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2024-01, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    8. Lerch, Christian M. & Horvat, Djerdj & Jasny, Johannes, 2024. "When manufacturers turn into digital platform providers: A transformation model to understand the platformization pathway," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    9. Barbier, Raphaëlle & Ben Yahia, Skander & Lenfle, Sylvain & Weil, Benoit, 2024. "Data-push innovation beyond serendipity: The case of a digital platform making Earth Observation data fit into multiple use contexts," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. Mosterd, Lars & Sobota, Vladimir C.M. & van de Kaa, Geerten & Ding, Aaron Yi & de Reuver, Mark, 2021. "Context dependent trade-offs around platform-to-platform openness: The case of the Internet of Things," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    11. Najda-Janoszka, Marta, 2018. "Towards Platform Defined Business – Complementarity at the Spotlight," MPRA Paper 87440, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Carmen Leong & Silvia Lin & Felix Tan & Jie Yu, 2024. "Coordination in a Digital Platform Organization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 363-393, March.
    13. Åkesson, Maria & Sørensen, Carsten & Eriksson, Carina Ihlström, 2018. "Ambidexterity under digitalization: A tale of two decades of new media at a Swedish newspaper," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 276-288.
    14. Ma, Shuzhong & Chai, Yuxi & Jia, Fu, 2022. "Mitigating transaction risk for cross-border e-commerce firms: A multiagent-based simulation study," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(4).
    15. Pujadas, Roser & Valderrama, Erika & Venters, Will, 2024. "The value and structuring role of web APIs in digital innovation ecosystems: The case of the online travel ecosystem," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    16. John A. Mathews, 2020. "Schumpeterian economic dynamics of greening: propagation of green eco-platforms," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 929-948, September.
    17. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    18. Jean-Michel Sahut & Luca Iandoli & Frédéric Teulon, 2021. "The age of digital entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1169, February.
    19. Maik Hesse & Timm Teubner & Marc T. P. Adam, 2022. "In Stars We Trust – A Note on Reputation Portability Between Digital Platforms," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(3), pages 349-358, June.
    20. Fontagné, Lionel & Secchi, Angelo & Tomasi, Chiara, 2018. "Exporters’ product vectors across markets," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 150-180.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Blockchain; Energie; Smart Meter; Regulatorik; ZKP;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:bayism:68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rwbayde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.