IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wsr/pbrief/y2024m01i61.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

FIW-PB 61 Innovation, industrial and trade policies for technological sovereignty

Author

Listed:
  • Jürgen Janger

Abstract

Interrupted supply chains in the wake of COVID-19 and Russia’s attack on Ukraine have highlighted the geopolitical risks of sourcing critical raw materials and products from a small number of authoritarian countries. The EU has initiated a flurry of activities to reduce unilateral dependencies, witnessed by trade, innovation and industrial policy instruments, such as the IPCEIs, the Chips Act and new anti-subsidy measures. This policy brief focuses on fostering technological sovereignty to insure against risks from international trade specifically in critical general purpose technologies. Bundles of innovation, industrial and trade policies enter three consistent policy mixes according to the distance to the technological frontier: for emerging technologies, the frontier policy mix emphasises an improvement in general framework conditions such as a more integrated European capital market. Technologies which lag behind the frontier benefit from coordinated support within the catch-up policy mix, while technologies at risk of losing their position at the frontier fall within the remit of the defensive policy mix.

Suggested Citation

  • Jürgen Janger, 2024. "FIW-PB 61 Innovation, industrial and trade policies for technological sovereignty," FIW Policy Brief series 61, FIW.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsr:pbrief:y:2024:m:01:i:61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.fiw.ac.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/61_FIW_PB_technological_sovereignty_final.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: none
    File URL: https://www.fiw.ac.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/61_FIW_PB_technological_sovereignty_final.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: none
    File URL: https://www.fiw.ac.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/61_FIW_PB_technological_sovereignty_final-1.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: none
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello & Nicola Grassano, 2022. "The EU vs US corporate R&D intensity gap: investigating key sectors and firms [A primer on innovation and growth]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(1), pages 19-38.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastiano Cattaruzzo & Agustí Segarra-Blasco & Mercedes Teruel, 2024. "Firm-level contributions to the R&D intensity distribution: evidence and policy implications," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 45-65, January.
    2. Alvarez, Roberto & Bravo-Ortega, Claudio & Poniachik, Dan, 2023. "Understanding R&D transitions: From bottom to top?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(4).
    3. Aristovnik, Aleksander & Yang, Guo-liang & Song, Yao-yao & Ravšelj, Dejan, 2023. "Industrial performance of the top R&D enterprises in world-leading economies: A metafrontier approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsr:pbrief:y:2024:m:01:i:61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.