IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wrk/wrkesp/73.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Political favoritism in post-conflict settings : evidence from Afghanistan after the Taliban takeover

Author

Listed:
  • Ha, Krystal

    (Monash University)

Abstract

I examine political favoritism based on prior support during conflicts. In particular, I identify whether or not the new Taliban regime in Afghanistan, which took over in August 2021, is systematically favoring its past allies using a difference-in-differences method. I proxy economic activity using nighttime light intensity and conflict alignment using a database of 75,915 militarily significant conflict events occurring in Afghanistan from 2004-2009. I find evidence that the Taliban are discriminating against their former enemies. I also find evidence that the Taliban are actively favouring their past allies in periods of low economic activity. This paper augments the literature on political favoritism by creating a new measure for political alignment and also suggests that the Taliban could be contributing to regional instability through favoritism.

Suggested Citation

  • Ha, Krystal, 2024. "Political favoritism in post-conflict settings : evidence from Afghanistan after the Taliban takeover," Warwick-Monash Economics Student Papers 73, Warwick Monash Economics Student Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:wrk:wrkesp:73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/wmesp/manage/73_-_krystal_ha.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niels Terpstra, 2020. "Rebel governance, rebel legitimacy, and external intervention: assessing three phases of Taliban rule in Afghanistan," Small Wars and Insurgencies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 1143-1173, August.
    2. Andrei Markevich & Natalya Naumenko & Nancy Qian, 2021. "The Causes of Ukrainian Famine Mortality, 1932-33," NBER Working Papers 29089, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Afghanistan ; favoritism ; spatial analysis ; georeferenced data ; conflict JEL classifications: D72 ; F51;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
      • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wrk:wrkesp:73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margaret Nash (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dewaruk.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.