IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wrk/warwec/1509.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Meritocratic Illusion Inequality and the Cognitive Basis of Redistribution

Author

Listed:
  • Blouin, Arthur

    (University of Toronto)

  • Mani, Anandi

    (University of Oxford)

  • Mukand, Sharun W.

    (University of Warwick Author-Sgroi, Daniel
    University of Warwick & IZA)

Abstract

Can inequality in rewards result in an erosion in broad-based support for meritocratic norms? We hypothesize that unequal rewards between the successful and the rest, drives a cognitive gap in their meritocratic beliefs, and hence their social preferences for redistribution. Two separate experiments (one in the UK and the other in the USA) show that the elite develop and maintain “meritocratic bias” in the redistributive taxes they propose, even when not applied to their own income: lower taxes on the rich and fewer transfers to the poor, including those who failed despite high effort. These social preferences at least partially reflect a selfserving meritocratic illusion that their own high income was deserved. A Wason Card task confirms that individuals maintain their illusion of being meritocratic, by not expending cognitive effort to process information that may undermine their self-image even when incentivized to do otherwise.

Suggested Citation

  • Blouin, Arthur & Mani, Anandi & Mukand, Sharun W., 2024. "The Meritocratic Illusion Inequality and the Cognitive Basis of Redistribution," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1509, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:wrk:warwec:1509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/workingpapers/2024/twerp_1509_-_sgroi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Inequality ; Meritocracy ; Redistribution ; Populism ; Motivated Reasoning ; Social Preferences;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wrk:warwec:1509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margaret Nash (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dewaruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.