IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wor/report/024.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Leistungsorientierte Vergütung im öffentlichen Dienst. Zur Validität des analytischen Beurteilungssystems LBB-SYS

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Fietze

    (Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg)

  • Doris Holtmann

    (Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg)

  • Wenzel Matiaske

    (Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Fietze & Doris Holtmann & Wenzel Matiaske, 2012. "Leistungsorientierte Vergütung im öffentlichen Dienst. Zur Validität des analytischen Beurteilungssystems LBB-SYS," Report 024, Werkstatt für Organisations- und Personalforschung.
    • Handle: RePEc:wor:report:024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vg08.met.vgwort.de/na/1d53a69ce45f4b5fb519198489a7e001?l=http://hermes.unibw-hamburg.de/werkstatt/berichte/bericht24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doris Holtmann & Prof. Dr. Wenzel Matiaske & Dieter Möllenhoff & Ingo Weller, 2001. "Leistungsbeurteilung im öffentlichen Dienst. Zur Validierung des Leistungsbeurteilungs- und -bewertungssystems LBB-SYS," Report 004, Werkstatt für Organisations- und Personalforschung.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doris Holtmann & Prof. Dr. Wenzel Matiaske & Ingo Weller, 2002. "Transparenz und Kommunikation als Erfolgsfaktoren von Leistungsbeurteilungen im öffentlichen Dienst. Vorstellung eines Forschungsprojektes," Report 009, Werkstatt für Organisations- und Personalforschung.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public services; performance pay; LBB-SYS;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wor:report:024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simon Fietze (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/worpfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.