IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wus005/270.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Territoriale Evolution von Kooperation in einem Gefangenendilemma

Author

Listed:
  • Grandner, Thomas

Abstract

Das Gefangenendilemma gilt als Standardmodell mit dessen Hilfe das Phänomen Kooperation dargestellt und analysiert werden kann, auch in der ökonomischen Forschung. Besonders interessant an diesem Spiel ist, daß die Lösung (das eindeutige Nashgleichgewicht) nicht pareto-effizient ist und Kooperation eine Pareto-Verbesserung darstellen würde. Für die beteiligten Spieler gibt es also eine bessere Situation als die gleichgewichtige, diese kann aber aus individualistischen Gründen nicht erreicht werden. Das Gefangenendilemma wird als Beschreibung vieler ökonomischer und nicht-ökonomischer Situationen interpretiert (Axelrod 1984). Die ökonomischen Interpretationen reichen von oligopolistischen Marktstrukturen (etwa Rasmusen 1989) bis zur Problemdarstellung öffentlicher Güter (etwa Hargreaves Heap 1994). Nicht-ökonomische Interpretationen findet man etwa im Bereich der biologischen Literatur zur Evolution (etwa Axelrod und Hamilton 1981).

Suggested Citation

  • Grandner, Thomas, 1996. "Territoriale Evolution von Kooperation in einem Gefangenendilemma," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 45, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wus005:270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://epub.wu.ac.at/270/
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dawes, Robyn M & Thaler, Richard H, 1988. "Anomalies: Cooperation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 2(3), pages 187-197, Summer.
    2. Hargreaves Heap, Shaun P, 1994. "Institutions and (Short-Run) Macroeconomic Performance," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 35-56, March.
    3. Alphons Kragt & Robyn Dawes & John Orbell, 1988. "Are people who cooperate ‘rational altruists’?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 233-247, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Powell, J.P., 2010. "The limits of economic self-interest : The case of open source software," Other publications TiSEM fc6d2aa1-8b29-40be-b888-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Schubert, Renate & Blasch, Julia, 2010. "Sustainability standards for bioenergy--A means to reduce climate change risks?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 2797-2805, June.
    3. Ingela Alger & Régis Renault, 2006. "Screening Ethics When Honest Agents Care About Fairness ," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 47(1), pages 59-85, February.
    4. Gruener Hans Peter & Hayo Bernd & Hefeker Carsten, 2009. "Unions, Wage Setting and Monetary Policy Uncertainty," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Louis Lévy-Garboua & Claude Montmarquette & Marie Claire Villeval, 2005. "Individual Responsibility and the Funding of Collective Goods," Post-Print halshs-00176697, HAL.
    6. Jung-Kyoo Choi, 2008. "Play locally, learn globally: group selection and structural basis of cooperation," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 239-257, December.
    7. Charles A. Holt & Monica Capra, 2000. "Classroom Games: A Prisoner's Dilemma," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 229-236, September.
    8. Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap, 2013. "Rationality," Chapters, in: Luigino Bruni & Stefano Zamagni (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Reciprocity and Social Enterprise, chapter 28, pages 277-284, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Legge, Stefan & Schmid, Lukas, 2016. "Media attention and betting markets," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 304-333.
    10. Glaser-Segura, Daniel & Anghel, Laurentiu-Dan, 2003. "Empirical Study Of Institutions Romania," MPRA Paper 9157, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2002.
    11. Bassi, Matteo & Pagnozzi, Marco & Piccolo, Salvatore, 2014. "Optimal contracting with altruism and reciprocity," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 27-38.
    12. Ch'ng, Kean Siang & Loke, Yiing Jia, 2010. "Inconsistency of fairness evaluation in simulated labot market," MPRA Paper 21527, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Daley, Brendan & Sadowski, Philipp, 2017. "Magical thinking: A representation result," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(2), May.
    14. Thomas Wagner, 1998. "Reciprocity And Efficiency," Rationality and Society, , vol. 10(3), pages 347-375, August.
    15. Bernd Hayo & Hans Peter Gruner & Carsten Hefeker, 2004. "Monetary policy uncertainty and unionized labour markets," Money Macro and Finance (MMF) Research Group Conference 2003 42, Money Macro and Finance Research Group.
    16. Goeree, Jacob K. & Offerman, Theo, 2003. "Winner's curse without overbidding," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 625-644, August.
    17. Salazar, Verónica & Szentes, Balázs, 2024. "On the coevolution of cooperation and social institutions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Gachter, Simon & Fehr, Ernst, 1999. "Collective action as a social exchange," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 341-369, July.
    19. Gulyás, Attila, 2011. "Diktátor a barátom? A barátság és a méltányosság kapcsolata [Is my friend a dictator? The relation between friendship and impartiality]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 430-444.
    20. Harel Goren & Gary Bornstein, 2000. "The Effects of Intragroup Communication on Intergroup Cooperation in the Repeated Intergroup Prisoner's Dilemma (IPD) Game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 44(5), pages 700-719, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gefangenendilemma; Kooperation;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wus005:270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: WU Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://research.wu.ac.at/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.