IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa12p92.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Regional economic assessment of Critical Infrastructure failure in the EU: A combined systems engineering and economic model

Author

Listed:
  • Olaf Jonkeren
  • Bogdan Dorneanu
  • Georgios Giannopoulos
  • David Ward

Abstract

The European Programme on Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP) of the European Commission is in search for a methodology to analyse economic consequences of critical infrastructure failure in the European Union. A combined Systems Engineering and Inoperability Input-Output model (SE-IIM) is developed to analyse the economic impact of such failure. In our application of this model, the economic losses as a result of the 2003 Italian power outage are analysed both, for the full system of economic industries and for a subsystem of 11 Critical Infrastructure (CI) industries. Economic losses are estimated on the national level and on the regional level (the north, center and south of Italy and for Sicily). Firstly, the systems engineering model analyses the performance degradation and recovery of the power system, as a result of failure and repair propagation. The behavior of the system is modeled by applying the conservation principles of the resources of the system. The conservation of the resource signifies that what enters the system should leave, is transformed into another quantity, or it accumulates in the system. Secondly, economic losses are estimated with the IIM using the information obtained in the SE model. Eurostat Input-Output data for Italy (of the industry-by-industry type) is used to analyse the effect of the initial perturbation (the outage) to the power infrastructure industry on its related CI industries in the four regions. The model is able to analyse how an initial perturbation impacting on one sector, propagates into the economic system due to the existence of economic interdependencies. Applying the IIM to the full system of 56 industries results in losses for the 11 CI industries of EURO 81.79 million and EURO 123.17 million for all industries together. Although the power outage lasted longest in the region Sicily, absolute economic losses are lowest in this region because of its relatively low economic output. The center of Italy suffered the highest economic losses. We conclude that the SE model is a simple tool of getting a rough picture of the phenomena that take place inside the considered system. The strength of the IIM is its holistic character: it can be applied to a complete system of industries, representing the economy of a region or country but one can also zoom in into a subsystem of industries to get a (rough) picture of the economic impact of a hazard on a set of industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Olaf Jonkeren & Bogdan Dorneanu & Georgios Giannopoulos & David Ward, 2012. "Regional economic assessment of Critical Infrastructure failure in the EU: A combined systems engineering and economic model," ERSA conference papers ersa12p92, European Regional Science Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa12p92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa12/e120821aFinal00094.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Setola, Roberto & De Porcellinis, Stefano & Sforna, Marino, 2009. "Critical infrastructure dependency assessment using the input–output inoperability model," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 170-178.
    2. Adam Rose & Shu‐Yi Liao, 2005. "Modeling Regional Economic Resilience to Disasters: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Water Service Disruptions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 75-112, February.
    3. de Nooij, Michiel & Koopmans, Carl & Bijvoet, Carlijn, 2007. "The value of supply security: The costs of power interruptions: Economic input for damage reduction and investment in networks," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 277-295, March.
    4. Oliva, Gabriele & Panzieri, Stefano & Setola, Roberto, 2011. "Fuzzy dynamic input–output inoperability model," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 165-175.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahmatallah Poudineh and Tooraj Jamasb, 2017. "Electricity Supply Interruptions: Sectoral Interdependencies and the Cost of Energy Not Served for the Scottish Economy," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    2. Olaf Jonkeren & Ivano Azzini & Luca Galbusera & Stavros Ntalampiras & Georgios Giannopoulos, 2015. "Analysis of Critical Infrastructure Network Failure in the European Union: A Combined Systems Engineering and Economic Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 253-270, June.
    3. Hassan Al-Zarooni & Hamdi Bashir, 2020. "An integrated ISM fuzzy MICMAC approach for modeling and analyzing electrical power system network interdependencies," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1204-1226, December.
    4. Botelho, Vinícius, 2019. "Estimating the economic impacts of power supply interruptions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 983-994.
    5. Sina Samimi & Sadoullah Ebrahimnejad & Mohammad Mojtahedi, 2020. "Analysis of the susceptibility of interdependent infrastructures using fuzzy input–output inoperability model: the case of flood hazards in Tehran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 100(1), pages 69-88, January.
    6. Hassan Al-Zarooni & Hamdi Bashir, 0. "An integrated ISM fuzzy MICMAC approach for modeling and analyzing electrical power system network interdependencies," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    7. Niknejad, Ali & Petrovic, Dobrila, 2016. "A fuzzy dynamic Inoperability Input–output Model for strategic risk management in Global Production Networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 44-58.
    8. Lam, C.Y. & Tai, K., 2018. "Modeling infrastructure interdependencies by integrating network and fuzzy set theory," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 51-61.
    9. Chopra, Shauhrat S. & Khanna, Vikas, 2015. "Interconnectedness and interdependencies of critical infrastructures in the US economy: Implications for resilience," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 865-877.
    10. Paul Raschky, 2007. "Estimating the effects of risk transfer mechanisms against floods in Europe and U.S.A.: A dynamic panel approach," Working Papers 2007-05, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    11. Masato Yamazaki & Atsushi Koike & Yoshinori Sone, 2018. "A Heuristic Approach to the Estimation of Key Parameters for a Monthly, Recursive, Dynamic CGE Model," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 283-301, October.
    12. Sellevåg, Stig Rune, 2021. "Changes in inoperability for interdependent industry sectors in Norway from 2012 to 2017," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    13. Armbruster, Ginger & Endicott-Popovsky, Barbara & Whittington, Jan, 2012. "Are we prepared for the economic risk resulting from telecom hotel disruptions?," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 55-65.
    14. Hannah Jona von Czettritz & Seyed-Ali Hosseini-Yekani & Johannes Schuler & Kurt-Christian Kersebaum & Peter Zander, 2023. "Adapting Cropping Patterns to Climate Change: Risk Management Effectiveness of Diversification and Irrigation in Brandenburg (Germany)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Juan C. Surís-Regueiro & José L. Santiago, 2016. "An Input-Output methodological proposal to quantifying socio economic impacts linked to supply shocks," Working Papers 1603, Universidade de Vigo, Departamento de Economía Aplicada.
    16. Dinar, Ariel, 2012. "Economy-wide implications of direct and indirect policy interventions in the water sector: lessons from recent work and future research needs," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6068, The World Bank.
    17. Aaron B. Gertz & James B. Davies & Samantha L. Black, 2019. "A CGE Framework for Modeling the Economics of Flooding and Recovery in a Major Urban Area," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(6), pages 1314-1341, June.
    18. Skorupski, Jacek & Uchroński, Piotr, 2017. "A fuzzy model for evaluating metal detection equipment at airport security screening checkpoints," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 39-48.
    19. Tanaka, Ayumu, 2015. "The impacts of natural disasters on plants' growth: Evidence from the Great Hanshin-Awaji (Kobe) earthquake," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 31-41.
    20. Matteo Coronese & Davide Luzzati, 2022. "Economic impacts of natural hazards and complexity science: a critical review," LEM Papers Series 2022/13, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa12p92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.