IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa02p425.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating the application of the European spatial development perspective in the United Kingdom: Methodological considerations and emerging trends

Author

Listed:
  • Sykes, Olivier John

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to consider how the emerging European spatial development policy agenda is influencing the performance of regional strategic planning in the United Kingdom. In May 1999 the Ministers of Spatial Planning meeting at Potsdam, Germany, agreed on the final version of the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) to guide spatially significant public policy making at all spatial scales from the Community level, to the regional/local level. The status of the ESDP as a non-binding and indicative, rather than prescriptive, document means that it seeks to guide institutions in the exercise of existing competences, which influence spatial development. Its application is therefore to be achieved through voluntary co-operation based on the principle of subsidiarity. One of the key aims of the ESDP Action Plan agreed at Tampere in October 1999 was the promotion of a spatial dimension in Community and national policies, including the integration of ESDP policy orientations into national spatial planning. Such moves towards a 'Europeanisation of state, regional and urban planning' can be seen as echoing Bruce Milan`s statement in the foreword to Europe 2000 that planning in isolation is no longer possible. Informed by this context, the focus of this paper is the application of the principles of 'Europeanisation' and 'spatialisation' to Regional Planning Guidance (RPG) documents in the UK. The paper will evaluate the extent to which the ESDP and the wider European context for planning are being used to inform and shape the development of RPG for the English regions. National policy on regional planning in England: PPG 11 - Regional Planning (DETR: 2000), makes clear that the European context and the ESDP provide an important context for the preparation of regional plans, and that they should be taken into account when developing the spatial strategy for the region and where appropriate in relation to any relevant policies. Consideration will be given to the way in which the spatial planning policy messages and approach of the ESDP have been integrated into the regional planning process and how they have helped to inform the development of substantive objectives for regional planning policy. The paper is based on work commissioned by the UK Planning Officers Society from the Department of Civic Design at Liverpool University and work completed towards ESRC supported PhD research.

Suggested Citation

  • Sykes, Olivier John, 2002. "Evaluating the application of the European spatial development perspective in the United Kingdom: Methodological considerations and emerging trends," ERSA conference papers ersa02p425, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa02/cd-rom/papers/425.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ole Jensen & Tim Richardson, 2001. "Nested Visions: New Rationalities of Space in European Spatial Planning," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8), pages 703-717.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tim Richardson & Ole B. Jensen, 2003. "Linking Discourse and Space: Towards a Cultural Sociology of Space in Analysing Spatial Policy Discourses," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 7-22, January.
    2. Gordon Dabinett, 2010. "Spatial Justice and the Translation of European Strategic Planning Ideas in the Urban Sub-region of South Yorkshire," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(11), pages 2389-2408, October.
    3. Geoff Vigar & Stephen Graham & Patsy Healey, 2005. "In Search of the City in Spatial Strategies: Past Legacies, Future Imaginings," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 1391-1410, July.
    4. Alison Caffyn & Margareta Dahlstrom, 2005. "Urban-rural interdependencies: Joining up policy in practice," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 283-296.
    5. Toni Ahlqvist, 2014. "Building Innovation Excellence of World Class: The Cluster as an Instrument of Spatial Governance in the European Union," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1712-1731, September.
    6. Knowles, Richard D. & Matthiessen, Christian W., 2009. "Barrier effects of international borders on fixed link traffic generation: the case of Øresundsbron," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 155-165.
    7. Wil Zonneveld, 2005. "Multiple Visioning: New Ways of Constructing Transnational Spatial Visions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 23(1), pages 41-62, February.
    8. Ruth Stevenson, 2009. "Discourse, Power, and Energy Conflicts: Understanding Welsh Renewable Energy Planning Policy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 27(3), pages 512-526, June.
    9. Ritchie, Heather & Hardy, Maelíosa & Lloyd, M. Greg & McGreal, Stanley, 2013. "Big Pylons: Mixed signals for transmission. Spatial planning for energy distribution," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 311-320.
    10. Cecilia Wong & Mark Baker & Brian Webb & Stephen Hincks & Andreas Schulze-Baing, 2015. "Mapping policies and programmes: the use of GIS to communicate spatial relationships in England," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 42(6), pages 1020-1039, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.