IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wii/mpaper/mr2008-01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Monthly Report No. 1/2008

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Pindyuk

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Leon Podkaminer

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Sandor Richter

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

Abstract

The member states' net financial position vis-à-vis the EU budget what has changed since the enlargement? (by S. Richter, pp. 1-7) Countries covered European Union Topics Economic Integration Current status of the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) negotiations (by O. Pindyuk, pp. 8-12) Countries covered WTO members Topics International Trade and Competitiveness The Reform Treaty monetary and economic policies unaffected (by L. Podkaminer, pp. 13-17) Countries covered European Union Topics Macroeconomic Analysis, Forecasts and Policy Industry statistics Selected indicators for 13 countries of Central, East and Southeast Europe, 2006 (pp. 19-29) Countries covered Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Ukraine Guide to wiiw statistical services on Central, East and Southeast Europe, Russia and Ukraine (p. 30)

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Pindyuk & Leon Podkaminer & Sandor Richter, 2008. "Monthly Report No. 1/2008," wiiw Monthly Reports 2008-01, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    • Handle: RePEc:wii:mpaper:mr:2008-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wiiw.ac.at/monthly-report-no-1-2008-dlp-168.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary Amiti & John Romalis, 2007. "Will the Doha Round Lead to Preference Erosion?," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 54(2), pages 338-384, June.
    2. Razeen Sally, 2006. "The Collapse Of The Doha Round: Does The Wto Have A Future?," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 80-80, December.
    3. Kym Anderson & Will Martin, 2007. "Agricultural And Nama Reform Under Doha: Implications For Asia‐Pacific Economies," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 319-333, August.
    4. repec:bla:devpol:v:25:y:2007:i:1:p:5-24 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Christian Häberli, 2007. "How to Conclude the Doha Development Agenda Comment faire pour terminer le cycle de Doha sur le développement? Wie die Doha Development Agenda geschlossen werden kann," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 6(2), pages 36-41, August.
    6. Mattoo, Aaditya, 2006. "Services, Economic Development and the Doha Round: Exploiting the Comparative Advantage of the WTO," CEPR Discussion Papers 5628, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Susanna Kinnman & Magnus Lodefalk, 2007. "What is at Stake in the Doha Round?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 1305-1325, August.
    8. Beáta Farkas & Michael Landesmann & Leon Podkaminer, 2013. "Monthly Report No. 1/2013," wiiw Monthly Reports 2013-01, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    9. Bernard Hoekman, 2007. "Doha, Development And Discrimination," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 267-292, August.
    10. Paul Collier, 2006. "Why the WTO is Deadlocked: And What Can Be Done About It," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(10), pages 1423-1449, October.
    11. Will Martin & Kym Anderson, 2006. "The Doha Agenda Negotiations on Agriculture: What Could They Deliver?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(5), pages 1211-1218.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N. N., 2007. "Austria's External Economic Relations 2007. Executive Summary," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 31061, January.
    2. Kym Anderson, 2006. "Reducing Distortions to Agricultural Incentives: Progress, Pitfalls, and Prospects," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(5), pages 1135-1146.
    3. Richard Pomfret & Uwe Kaufmann & Christopher Findlay, 2010. "Are Preferential Tariffs Utilized? Evidence from Australian Imports, 2000-9," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2010-13, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    4. Anania, Giovanni, 2007. "Multilateral Negotiations, Preferential Trade Agreements and the CAP. What's Ahead?," Working Papers 7283, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    5. Bernard Hoekman & Aaditya Mattoo & André Sapir, 2007. "The political economy of services trade liberalization: a case for international regulatory cooperation?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 23(3), pages 367-391, Autumn.
    6. Elisabeth M. Christen & Joseph Francois & Bernard Hoekman, 2012. "CGE Modeling of Market Access in Services," Economics working papers 2012-08, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    7. Persson, Maria, 2008. "Trade Facilitation and the Extensive and Intensive Margins of Trade," Working Papers 2008:13, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    8. Huang, Jikun & Yang, Jun & Msangi, Siwa & Rozelle, Scott & Weersink, Alfons, 2012. "Global biofuel production and poverty in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 246-255.
    9. Michael Reiterer, 2009. "The Doha development agenda of the WTO," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 9(4), pages 359-375, October.
    10. Stephen, Matthew D. & Parízek, Michal, 2019. "New Powers and the Distribution of Preferences in Global Trade Governance: From Deadlock and Drift to Fragmentation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 24(6), pages 735-758.
    11. Imad Kareem Alaamshani & Hanny Zurina Hamzah & Shivee Ranjanee Kaliappan & Normaz Wana Ismail, 2021. "Impact of Trade Facilitation on Extensive Margin," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 131-147.
    12. Legge, Stefan & Lukaszuk, Piotr, 2024. "The firm-level costs of utilizing free trade agreements," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    13. Temitope Peter Ola, 2022. "Contributions Of African Growth And Opportunity Act To International Trade Of Sub-Saharan Africa," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 20(4), pages 327-345.
    14. Mehdi Shafaeddin, 2010. "The Political Economy of WTO with Special Reference to NAMA Negotiations," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 22(2), pages 175-196, April.
    15. Persson, Maria, 2012. "From trade preferences to trade facilitation: Taking stock of the issues," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 6, pages 1-33.
    16. Isabelle Rabaud & Thierry Montalieu, 2006. "Trade in Services : how does it Work for MENA Countries?," Post-Print halshs-00204977, HAL.
    17. Shepherd, Ben, 2015. "Product Standards and Export Diversification," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 30(2), pages 300-333.
    18. McCalla, Alex F., 2007. "Implications of WTO Developments for Market Integration," 2007 NAAMIC Workshop IV: Contemporary Drivers of Integration 163900, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).
    19. Gouel, Christophe & Mitaritonna, Cristina & Ramos, Maria Priscila, 2011. "Sensitive products in the Doha negotiations: The case of European and Japanese market access," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 2395-2403.
    20. Faude, Benjamin, 2020. "Breaking gridlock: how path dependent layering enhances resilience in global trade governance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103927, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wii:mpaper:mr:2008-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Customer service (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wiiwwat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.