IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wii/cprofi/18.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Accession Treaty and Consequences for New EU Members

Author

Listed:
  • Sandor Richter

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

Abstract

Now that the Accession Treaty is signed and the 'rules of the game' are set, the possible consequences of the EU accession for the prospective new members get into a new perspective. Various aspects (transfers, taxes, industry, agriculture and the services sector) of the impact of EU accession on the economy of the new EU member states are addressed in this study. Out of the EUR 41 billion commitments for transfers to the new members in 2004-2006, not more than EUR 5 to 10 billion net additional financial resources will be available. This latter figure represents the real cost of enlargement for the EU?15. However, the very modest overall net financial gain (0.4% to 0.8% of the new members' GDP) should not be mixed up with the impact of transfers. Transfers from the Structural and Cohesion Funds will be concentrated in certain segments of the economy (transport, other infrastructure, environment, education and training, etc.) and their impact, provided the absorption capacity is there, may be quite large. At the same time, contributions to the EU budget and co-financing of EU projects will create serious fiscal tensions. The impact of changes in taxation is controversial. Revenues from VAT will increase. The same applies to excise taxes on cigarettes and alcohol. Customs duties will be channelled to Brussels, a painful loss to the central budget. Pre-accession tax allowances for foreign investors have already ceased. Possible negative effects will be compensated by decreasing risk and new opportunities to participate in EU co-financed projects. Some accession countries have been highly successful in productivity catching-up in several medium? and high-tech industries and reported considerable market share gains in the EU. A closer look at the winner and loser industries (in terms of market shares) suggests that manufacturing in the core EU countries may face challenges after enlargement. Most CEECs do not compete with the EU cohesion countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), but rather with Austria, France, Germany, Italy and Ireland. CEE agriculture will face serious difficulties after accession. Strict EU rules will force many small family farms to leave the market. Large farms will have to cope with rising costs. Modernization will become crucial, but the lack of funds will be a constraint. In the new members' trade in processed food products with the EU?15, the trade balance may worsen initially, but will probably improve in the longer run due to foreign direct investment. The accession countries have successfully departed from their industry-dominated economic structure. Their GDP structure already resembles that of the developed market economies with a high share of the services sector. However, traditional services activities such as trade, transport and telecommunications dominate while segments with higher value added, especially business services, are lagging behind. The latter offer new opportunities for trade and investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandor Richter, 2003. "The Accession Treaty and Consequences for New EU Members," wiiw Country Profile 18, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
  • Handle: RePEc:wii:cprofi:18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wiiw.ac.at/the-accession-treaty-and-consequences-for-new-eu-members-dlp-10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Stare, 2001. "Advancing the Development of Producer Services in Slovenia with Foreign Direct Investment," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 19-34, January.
    2. Gabor Hunya, 2003. "Foreign Direct Investment in CEECs and the Former Soviet Union - with Special Attention to Austrian FDI Activities," wiiw FDI Reports 2003-02, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    3. Tatyana P. Soubbotina & Katherine A. Sheram, 2000. "Beyond Economic Growth : Meeting the Challenges of Global Development," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15789.
    4. Gábor Hunya & Jan Stankovsky, 2003. "WIIW-WIFO Database. Foreign Direct Investment in CEECs and the Former Soviet Union with Special Attention to Austrian FDI Activities," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 24382.
    5. Gábor Hunya & Jan Stankovsky, 2003. "WIIW-WIFO Database. Foreign Direct Investment in CEECs and the Former Soviet Union with Special Attention to Austrian FDI Activities," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 23518.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Havlik, 2003. "EU Enlargement: Growth, Competitiveness and Some Challenges Facing the Future Member States," wiiw Country Profile 20, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    2. Andreea Vass, 2005. "Romania and the trade and the development approaches to CEE convergence with the EU, under the competitive pressures of integration," IWE Working Papers 151, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrizia Baur & Peter Havlik & Kazimierz Laski & Zdenek Lukas & Leon Podkaminer & Josef Pöschl & Sandor Richter & Roman Römisch & Hermine Vidovic, 2003. "Monthly Report special issue Spring Seminar No. S1/2003," wiiw Monthly Reports 2003-S01, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    2. Harald Zschiedrich, 2004. "Ausländische Direktinvestitionen: Segen oder Fluch?," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 30(1), pages 45-71.
    3. Kamel Bel Hadj Miled & Moheddine Younsi & Monia Landolsi, 2022. "Does microfinance program innovation reduce income inequality? Cross-country and panel data analysis," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Marta Santagata & Enrico Ivaldi & Riccardo Soliani, 2019. "Development and Governance in the Ex-Soviet Union: An Empirical Inquiry," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 157-190, January.
    5. Surajit Mazumdar, 2010. "Industry and Services in Growth and Structural Change in India: Some Unexplored Features," Working Papers 1002, Institute for Studies in Industrial Development (ISID).
    6. Bienvenido Ortega & Antonio Casquero & Jesús Sanjuán, 2016. "Corruption and Convergence in Human Development: Evidence from 69 Countries During 1990–2012," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 691-719, June.
    7. repec:lib:00johs:v:10:y:2014:i:1:p:46-58 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Sitthiyot, Thitithep & Holasut, Kanyarat, 2016. "On Income Inequality and Population Size," MPRA Paper 73684, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Khuong Minh Vu, 2013. "The Dynamics of Economic Growth," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14689.
    10. Jeremy S. Brooks, 2013. "Avoiding the Limits to Growth: Gross National Happiness in Bhutan as a Model for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-25, August.
    11. Mihai MUTASCU & Nicolae-Bogdan IANC & ALBERT LESSOUA, 2021. "Public debt and inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa: the case of EMCCA and WAEMU countries," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2909, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    12. Lee, Lena & Wong, Poh Kam & Chua, Bee Leng & Chen, Jennifer, 2005. "Antecedents for Entrepreneurial Propensity: Findings from Singapore, Hong Kong and Taiwan," MPRA Paper 594, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Salvatore Flavio Pileggi, 2023. "Walking Together Indicator (WTI): Understanding and Measuring World Inequality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Rachel M. Gisselquist, 2012. "Good Governance as a Concept, and Why This Matters for Development Policy," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-030, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    15. Wen Hong, 2003. "An Assessment of the Business Environment for High-Tech Industrial Development in Shanghai," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 21(1), pages 107-137, February.
    16. Yeh, Sonia, 2007. "An empirical analysis on the adoption of alternative fuel vehicles: The case of natural gas vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5865-5875, November.
    17. Damijan, Jože & Kostevc, Črt & Marek, Philipp & Rojec, Matija, 2015. "Do Manufacturing Firms Benefit from Services FDI? – Evidence from Six New EU Member States," IWH Discussion Papers 5/2015, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    18. Mora-Alfaro, Jorge, 2005. "Desarrollo socioeconómico y pobreza en América Latina y el Caribe [Socio Economic Development and poverty in Latin America and the Caribbean]," MPRA Paper 1529, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Selomane, Odirilwe & Reyers, Belinda & Biggs, Reinette & Tallis, Heather & Polasky, Stephen, 2015. "Towards integrated social–ecological sustainability indicators: Exploring the contribution and gaps in existing global data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 140-146.
    20. Ta Nhat Linh & Hoang Thanh Long & Le Van Chi & Le Thanh Tam & Philippe Lebailly, 2019. "Access to Rural Credit Markets in Developing Countries, the Case of Vietnam: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    21. 2017, Seminar Nasional Multidisiplin Ilmu & GS, Achmad Daengs & , mahjudin, 2017. "Influential Of Economic Growth, Manpower Absorption On Public Welfare," INA-Rxiv fvkyt, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EU enlargement; accession countries; transfers; budget; taxation; direct and indirect taxes; industry; industrial branches competitiveness; agriculture; CAP; direct payments; food industry; services; tertiary sector; business services;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F36 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration
    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • L8 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services
    • L6 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wii:cprofi:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Customer service (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wiiwwat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.