IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wfo/wpaper/y2007i287.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ach wie gut, dass niemand weiß ...? Anmerkungen zur Methodenwahl bei Institutsrankings

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Huber
  • Angelina Keil

Abstract

Für die Diskussion verschiedener Verfahren zur Erstellung bibliometrischer Analysen und Rankings von Wirtschaftsforschungsinstituten werden zwei neuere, in den "Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik" publizierte Studien herangezogen. Demnach kann die Normierung mit der Zahl der Mitarbeiter und Mitarbeiterinnen oder Akademiker und Akademikerinnen vor allem bei weniger selektiven Gewichtungsmethoden wesentlichen Einfluss auf die Ergebnisse haben; die unterschiedlichen Methoden für die Erstellung der Datenbasis haben zudem großen Einfluss auf Datenqualität und Ergebnisse. Rankings auf der Basis verschiedener Methoden zur Qualitätsgewichtung sind untereinander oftmals hoch korreliert, liefern aber sehr unterschiedliche Platzierungen einzelner Institute.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Huber & Angelina Keil, 2007. "Ach wie gut, dass niemand weiß ...? Anmerkungen zur Methodenwahl bei Institutsrankings," WIFO Working Papers 287, WIFO.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wpaper:y:2007:i:287
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/28061
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Lubrano & Luc Bauwens & Alan Kirman & Camelia Protopopescu, 2003. "Ranking Economics Departments in Europe: A Statistical Approach," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(6), pages 1367-1401, December.
    2. Michael Bräuninger & Justus Haucap, 2001. "Was Ökonomen lesen und schätzen: Ergebnisse einer Umfrage," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 2(2), pages 185-210, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rolf Ketzler & Klaus F. Zimmermann, 2009. "Publications: German economic research institutes on track," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(1), pages 231-252, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angelina Keil & Peter Huber, 2004. "„Wo die Luft dünn wird…”– Zur Publikationstätigkeit der Wirtschaftsforschungsinstitute Österreichs und Deutschlands," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 5(3), pages 363-375, August.
    2. Graber Michael & Wälde Klaus, 2008. "Publish or Perish? The Increasing Importance of Publications for Prospective Economics Professors in Austria, Germany and Switzerland," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 457-472, December.
    3. repec:bla:germec:v:9:y:2008:i::p:457-472 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Launov, Andrey & Graber, Michael & Wälde, Klaus, 2007. "How to get tenured (in Germany, in Economics)," W.E.P. - Würzburg Economic Papers 75, University of Würzburg, Department of Economics.
    5. Justus Haucap & Michael Mödl, 2013. "Zum Verhältnis von Spitzenforschung und Politikberatung: Eine empirische Analyse vor dem Hintergrund des Ökonomenstreits," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 14(3-4), pages 346-378, August.
    6. Günther G. Schulze & Susanne Warning & Christian Wiermann, 2008. "Zeitschriftenrankings für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften – Konstruktion eines umfassenden Metaindexes," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 9(3), pages 286-305, August.
    7. Michael Graber & Andrey Launov & Klaus Waelde, 2007. "How to get tenured," Working Papers 030, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    8. Magnus Henrekson & Daniel Waldenström, 2011. "How Should Research Performance Be Measured? A Study Of Swedish Economists," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 79(6), pages 1139-1156, December.
    9. Miriam Hein, 2005. "Wie hat sich die universitaere volkswirtschaftliche Forschung in der Schweiz seit Beginn der 90er Jahre entwickelt?�," TWI Research Paper Series 11, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
    10. Miguel Sarmiento, 2010. "Central Bank Economic Research: Output, Demand, Productivity, and Relevance," Money Affairs, CEMLA, vol. 0(2), pages 211-240, July-Dece.
    11. Justus Haucap & Johannes Muck, 2015. "What drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(3), pages 849-877, June.
    12. Stephen Bazen & Patrick Moyes, 2012. "Elitism and stochastic dominance," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(1), pages 207-251, June.
    13. Mark J. McCabe & Christopher M. Snyder, 2015. "Does Online Availability Increase Citations? Theory and Evidence from a Panel of Economics and Business Journals," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 97(1), pages 144-165, March.
    14. Rolf Ketzler & Klaus F. Zimmermann, 2009. "Publications: German economic research institutes on track," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(1), pages 231-252, July.
    15. Hendrik P. van Dalen, 2019. "Values of Economists Matter in the Art and Science of Economics," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 472-499, August.
    16. Jan Ours & Frederic Vermeulen, 2007. "Ranking Dutch Economists," De Economist, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 469-487, December.
    17. Martin Steininger & Bernd Süssmuth, 2005. "Elfenbeinligen und ihre Erfassung: Ein Kommentar und eine neuerliche Messung der Publikationstätigkeit der Wirtschaftsforschungsinstitute im deutschsprachigen Raum: 1989–2003," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 6(3), pages 409-420, August.
    18. Pedro Albarrán & Raquel Carrasco & Javier Ruiz-Castillo, 2017. "Are Migrants More Productive Than Stayers? Some Evidence From A Set Of Highly Productive Academic Economists," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(3), pages 1308-1323, July.
    19. Oliver Fabel & Miriam Hein & Robert Hofmeister, 2008. "Research Productivity in Business Economics: An Investigation of Austrian, German and Swiss Universities," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 9(4), pages 506-531, November.
    20. Robert F. Mulligan, 2024. "Publication trends in political economy scholarship 2011–2020," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 200-302, June.
    21. Fabel, Oliver & Lehmann, Erik & Warning, Susanne, 2002. "Vorträge als Qualitätsindikator: Empirische Evidenz der Jahrestagungen des Vereins für Socialpolitik," Discussion Papers, Series I 321, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Rankings Publikationstätigkeit empirische Wirtschaftsforschungsinstitute;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wpaper:y:2007:i:287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.