IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/10419.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Using Behavioral Science to Increase Women’s Participation in Natural ResourceManagement in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Reyes-Retana,Graciela
  • Pons,Gonzalo Antonio
  • Siegmann,Katharina
  • Afif,Zeina
  • Gomez-Garcia,Margarita
  • Soto-Mota,Pablo
  • Castaneda Farill,Carmen Elena

Abstract

Natural resources management (NRM) helps protect forests and promote sustainable development.Although women are key in strengthening activities in NRM, they are dramatically underrepresented in public funding forforest projects in many countries, such as Mexico, limiting their participation and impact. While structural barriers,such as land tenure and low capacity, cause this problem, this is exacerbated by barriers such as lack of information,complex application processess, gender norms, and rural women’s low aspirations and limited agency and self-efficacyto participate in NRM projects. This paper tests whether additions and modifications to the standard outreachstrategies of a call for proposals for NRM grants in Mexico increase the number of applications submitted by localitiesand the share of women participating. The study uses a randomized controlled trial in 113 rural localities, wherethe standard outreach approach (control) is complemented with additional information channels and simplifiedmaterials (treatment 1), aiming to appeal more directly to inexperienced populations. A second treatment group furthermodifies the informational materials using insights from behavioral science (loss aversion, norms framing, andothers) and adds proactive text message reminders to prompt behavior (treatment 2), hoping to address the barriers towomen’s participation. The results suggest that treatment 1 localities had, on average, 2.3 more applications perlocality than the control group (increasing the participation of both men and women). Treatment 2complemented this, having, on average, 6.4 more women per locality participating of these applications than intreatment 1. This shows that women manifested interest in participating in these activities. A representative surveyof women in the study localities (1,485 women in 52 localities) suggests that women in treatment localities weremore likely to recognize the name of the project or informational materials. The analysis also suggests that thecomplementary strategies had no effect on the likelihood of being selected to receive a grant under the project,suggesting that additional support is needed to translate this increased interest into successful applications thatwould allow participation in NRM.

Suggested Citation

  • Reyes-Retana,Graciela & Pons,Gonzalo Antonio & Siegmann,Katharina & Afif,Zeina & Gomez-Garcia,Margarita & Soto-Mota,Pablo & Castaneda Farill,Carmen Elena, 2023. "Using Behavioral Science to Increase Women’s Participation in Natural ResourceManagement in Mexico," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10419, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:10419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099723304212320688/pdf/IDU02e1563730a26304d7f096990e5122a3a4420.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanders, Michael & Snijders, Veerle & Hallsworth, Michael, 2018. "Behavioural science and policy: where are we now and where are we going?," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 144-167, November.
    2. Larson, Anne M. & Solis, David & Duchelle, Amy E. & Atmadja, Stibniati & Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja & Dokken, Therese & Komalasari, Mella, 2018. "Gender lessons for climate initiatives: A comparative study of REDD+ impacts on subjective wellbeing," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 86-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ezgi Canpolat & Meerim Shakirova & Vince McElhinny & Kame Westerman & Alli Cruz & Theresa Buppert, 2022. "Fostering Gender-Transformative Change in Sustainable Forest Management," World Bank Publications - Reports 37127, The World Bank Group.
    2. Rafaï, Ismaël & Ribaillier, Arthur & Jullien, Dorian, 2025. "The impact on nudge acceptability judgements of framing and consultation of the targeted population," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 176-191, January.
    3. Mark Whitehead & Rhys Jones & Jessica Pykett, 2020. "Questioning post-political perspectives on the psychological state: Behavioural public policy in the Netherlands," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(2), pages 214-232, March.
    4. Benno Torgler, 2022. "The power of public choice in law and economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1410-1453, December.
    5. Etienne Lwamba & Shannon Shisler & Will Ridlehoover & Meital Kupfer & Nkululeko Tshabalala & Promise Nduku & Laurenz Langer & Sean Grant & Ada Sonnenfeld & Daniela Anda & John Eyers & Birte Snilstveit, 2022. "Strengthening women's empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    6. Satyal, Poshendra & Corbera, Esteve & Dawson, Neil & Dhungana, Hari & Maskey, Gyanu, 2020. "Justice-related impacts and social differentiation dynamics in Nepal's REDD+ projects," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Sapkota, Lok Mani & Jihadah, Lina & Sato, Mayumi & Greijmans, Martin & Wiset, Kanchana & Aektasaeng, Ngamnet & Daisai, Atcharaporn & Gritten, David, 2021. "Translating global commitments into action for successful forest landscape restoration: Lessons from Ing watershed in northern Thailand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    8. Netta Barak‐Corren & Yael Kariv‐Teitelbaum, 2021. "Behavioral responsive regulation: Bringing together responsive regulation and behavioral public policy," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(S1), pages 163-182, November.
    9. Arthur Ribaillier & Ismaël Rafaï & Dorian Jullien, 2021. "The Impact on Acceptability Judgments about Nudges of Framing and Consultation with the Targeted Population," GREDEG Working Papers 2021-12, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    10. Roxana HATOS & Cristina Laura ABRUDAN, 2023. "Why Should I Study In English? Students’ Perception And Motivation," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 32(2), pages 199-208, December.
    11. Moeliono, Moira & Brockhaus, Maria & Gallemore, Caleb & Dwisatrio, Bimo & Maharani, Cynthia D. & Muharrom, Efrian & Pham, Thuy Thu, 2020. "REDD+ in Indonesia: A new mode of governance or just another project?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    12. Shyamsundar, Priya & Ahlroth, Sofia & Kristjanson, Patricia & Onder, Stefanie, 2020. "Supporting pathways to prosperity in forest landscapes – A PRIME framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Cadario, Romain & Chandon, Pierre, 2019. "Viewpoint: Effectiveness or consumer acceptance? Tradeoffs in selecting healthy eating nudges," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-6.
    14. Gencer, Busra & van Ackere, Ann, 2021. "Achieving long-term renewable energy goals: Do intermediate targets matter?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. Romain Cadario & Pierre Chandon, 2019. "Viewpoint: Effectiveness or consumer acceptance? Tradeoffs in selecting healthy eating nudges," Post-Print hal-02508983, HAL.
    16. Neckermann, Susanne & Turmunkh, Uyanga & van Dolder, Dennie & Wang, Tong V., 2022. "Nudging student participation in online evaluations of teaching: Evidence from a field experiment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Mills, Stuart, 2024. "Deceptive choice architecture and behavioral audits: a principles‐based approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122714, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Fels, Katja M., 2021. "Who nudges whom? Field experiments with public partners," Ruhr Economic Papers 906, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    19. S. Mills & S. Costa & C. R. Sunstein, 2023. "AI, Behavioural Science, and Consumer Welfare," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 387-400, September.
    20. Hajjar, Reem & Newton, Peter & Ihalainen, Markus & Agrawal, Arun & Alix-Garcia, Jennifer & Castle, Sarah E. & Erbaugh, James T. & Gabay, Monica & Hughes, Karl & Mawutor, Samuel & Pacheco, Pablo & Scho, 2021. "Levers for alleviating poverty in forests," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:10419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.