IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/jbsgrp/31113790.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Cassava Value Chain in Mozambique

Author

Listed:
  • Costa, Carlos G.
  • Delgado, Christopher L.

Abstract

Cassava is the principal starch in Mozambique, at 30 percent of calories. It can be stored unharvested up to 30 months, but fresh cassava lasts only 3 days once harvested. Most processing in Mozambique is artisanal, to eliminate cyanogenic glycosides in the 90 percent of production from pest resistant bitter varieties. Only 6 percent of production in 2011 was used commercially for non-food, two-thirds for feed and one-third for starch. Low levels of productivity for cassava compared to elsewhere and poor transportation are the main barriers to the development of a processing industry. Unit costs of production range from USD 0.09 to USD 0.30 U.S. cents per kg. Producers would need to achieve 15 tons/hectare to be commercially viable, compared to average yields between 5 and 9 tons/hectare in Mozambique. Actions recommended include: adoption of a ""Master Plan ""; time-limited subsidies for industrial High Quality Cassava Flour, ethanol, and starch; a network of service providers to operate in smallholder areas to deliver improved inputs and extension; promotion of farmers’ associations for better access to service providers; research on pest control in sweet varieties; greater availability of global market intelligence; capacity-building for processing; and introduction of legal norms to prevent processors from polluting.

Suggested Citation

  • Costa, Carlos G. & Delgado, Christopher L., 2019. "The Cassava Value Chain in Mozambique," Jobs Group Papers, Notes, and Guides 31113790, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:jbsgrp:31113790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/340481559135255608/The-Cassava-Value-Chain-in-Mozambique
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lourenço Manuel & Orcídia Chiziane & Gaby Mandhlate & Faaiqa Hartley & Emílio Tostão, 2021. "Impact of climate change on the agriculture sector and household welfare in Mozambique: an analysis based on a dynamic computable general equilibrium model," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Oyita, Governor Ekene & Enwa, Sarah & Aberji, Okompu Davina, 2023. "Climate Variability, Cassava Output and Food Security in Nigeria," Nigerian Agricultural Policy Research Journal (NAPReJ), Agricultural Policy Research Network (APRNet), vol. 10(1), June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cassava production; farmer; Micro and Small Enterprises; global value chain; paper issue; supply of raw material; cassava processing; food crop; staple food crop; fresh cassava; food balance sheets; cost of production; production of cassava; business environment; international market; food product; land use right; high protein content; areas of production; animal feed ingredient; high yield variety; privileges and immunity; tolerance to pest; climate change issue; area under cultivation; resistance to drought; private sector job; rural service provider; division of labour; division of labor; gross domestic product; consumption per capita; industrial process; traditional food; cassava flour; smallholder farmer; rural family; genetic material; ethanol production; pest control; world production; export market; processing methods; commercial purpose; harvest area; human consumption; collected information; commercially viable; cultivation practice; shelf life; global production; asian countries; household level; cassava consumption; regional market; small farm; ongoing support; global market; cash crop; management skill; field days; root crop; business model; innovative initiative; demonstration plots; improved technologies; agricultural growth; humid tropics; global scale; Postharvest Losses; total tonnage; irish potato; sweet potato; product quality; post harvest; supplementary food; constant rate; emergency situation; productivity growth; germ plasm; domestic demand; transportation infrastructure; small manufacturing; present cost; animal feeding; market price; starch production; reliable access; urban family; food safety; supply chain; farm yield; gender dimension; input supply; industrial capacity; small farmer; dry product; secondary sources; research study; feed grain; flour production; innovative business; private company; sun drying; traditional methods; farmer training; private entrepreneurship; bioactive products; maize production; collected data; agricultural production; smallholder producer; efficient transport; logistics system; production method; underground storage; small area; export crop; commercial crop; agricultural census; increase productivity; infertile soil; trade corridors; agricultural potential; rural population; southern coast; national policy; bakery product; fiscal measure; technological process; dietary energy; technological support; industrial purpose; food industry; resistant crop; convenience food; domestic policies; remote region; global export; global trade; agricultural practice; soil fertility; cereal harvest; lean season; labour input; Water Management; medical product; extreme drought; manufacturing sector; hydrogen cyanide; plant material; technology support; ethanol price; export trade; crop duration; farm area; industry benchmarking; market opportunity; oil product; fiscal policy; pharmaceutical use; processed food; private investment; smallholder agriculture; national survey; Public-Private Partnership; good hygiene; acquired immunity; cooking fuel; donor assistance; technological improvement; maize price; Fiscal policies; environmental issue; supply-side constraints; supply-side issue; market issues; trade issue; supply constraint; regional demand; legal norm; farmers' association; copyright owner; sole responsibility; original work; global partnership; coastal region; national production; mechanical process; upper bind;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:jbsgrp:31113790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Selome Assefa Hailemariam (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.