IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/hdnspu/160059.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Intent to Implementation : Tracking India’s Social Protection Response to COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Bhattacharya,Shrayana
  • Sinha Roy,Sutirtha

Abstract

The article takes stock of the social protection measures implemented through the Pradhan MantriGarib Kalyan Yojana (PMGKY) to respond to the livelihoods impact of COVID-19 in India. The paper reports the share ofhouseholds that received food, cash transfers and both forms of assistance under the PMGKY program at the national andstate level. While a few surveys have reported coverage and benefit receipt information related to PMGKY, the currentanalysis draws on one of India’s largest panel survey of households from CMIE to better quantify the coverage andtargeting parameters. Results find that nearly 80 percent of all households received at least one social protectionbenefit from government programs. Approximately 40 percent of all poor households reported receiving both food and cashassistance. While subsequent versions of the paper shall attempt to unpack quantum of assistance, the first round ofresults on receipt of any transfers suggest that relief measures have been pro-poor and broad-based in outreach.However, there are state level variations in benefit delivery. Urban areas have lagged in coverage and cashtransfers reached fewer shares of households relative to food distribution through the Public Distribution System(PDS). Furthermore, analysis highlights the need to bolster benefit levels for any future relief measures. Drawing onlessons from PMGKY implementation, the article concludes with suggestions on designing a decentralized and adaptivesocial protection system in India to protect the poor and vulnerable against impacts from the second wave of thepandemic and any future crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhattacharya,Shrayana & Sinha Roy,Sutirtha, 2021. "Intent to Implementation : Tracking India’s Social Protection Response to COVID-19," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 160059, The World Bank.
    • Handle: RePEc:wbk:hdnspu:160059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/489721623054844190/pdf/Intent-to-Implementation-Tracking-India-s-Social-Protection-Response-to-COVID-19.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guardiancich,Igor & Weaver,R. Kent & Demarco,Gustavo C. & Dorfman,Mark Charles, 2019. "The Politics of NDC Pension Scheme Diffusion : Constraints and Drivers," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 136556, The World Bank.
    2. Ch?on-Dominczak,Agnieszka & Góra,Marek & Kotowska,Irena E. & Magda,Iga & Ruzik-Sierdzinska,Anna & Strzelecki,Pawe?, 2019. "The Impact of Lifetime Events on Pensions : NDC Schemes in Poland, Italy, and Sweden and the Point Scheme in Germany," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 136869, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mrinalini Jha & Amit Basole, 2023. "Labour Incomes in India: A Comparison of Two National Household Surveys," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 66(1), pages 181-201, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdul Hadi & Emese Bruder & Widhayani Puri Setioningtyas, 2022. "Comparison of the World’s Best Pension Systems: The Lesson for Indonesia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Klimczuk, Andrzej & Tomczyk, Łukasz, 2019. "Between Successful and Unsuccessful Ageing: Selected Aspects and Contexts," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, volume 0, number 226194, December.
    3. Barr, Nicholas, 2019. "Gender and family: conceptual overview," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101237, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Banyár, József, 2020. "Miként javítható az állami nyugdíjrendszer? Öt lehetséges lépés egy átfogó reformhoz [How can the state pension system be improved? Five possible steps to comprehensive reform]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 632-652.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:hdnspu:160059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aaron F Buchsbaum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.