IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vua/wpaper/2002-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of multifunctional land use: design and application of policy criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Rodenburg, C.

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Econometrie (Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics Sciences, Business Administration and Economitrics)

  • Nijkamp, P.

Abstract

Multifunctional land use has recently received increasing attention, both as a planning concept and as a tool for integrated modelling. When a multifunctional spatial planning design is used, socio-economic synergy benefits may be obtained, if several (complementaty or mutually strengthening) functions are exercised at the same place and time. The present paper aims to offer a new contribution to the economics of multifunctional land use by analysing this concept in greater detail from an operational and integrative perspective. A functional typology of specific land use functions is presented, along with the development of assessment criterta to measure the degree of multifunctionality of specific land use projects. A Dutch case study of a multifunctional land use project, the so-called Amsterdam South-Axis, is presented and analysed as an illustrative case.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodenburg, C. & Nijkamp, P., 2002. "Evaluation of multifunctional land use: design and application of policy criteria," Serie Research Memoranda 0028, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    • Handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:2002-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://degree.ubvu.vu.nl/repec/vua/wpaper/pdf/20020028.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julia R. Kotzebue, 2016. "The EU integrated urban development policy: managing complex processes in dynamic places," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 1098-1117, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:2002-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: R. Dam (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fewvunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.