IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vua/wpaper/1999-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Advances in comparative assessment research in the space-economy

Author

Listed:
  • Nijkamp, Peter

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Econometrie (Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics Sciences, Business Administration and Economitrics)

Abstract

This paper aims to give a survey of recent assessment methods in spatial planning. The attention is focused on three classes of evaluation methods, viz. regime analysis, the flag model and rough set analysis. The various methods are discussed and their strengths and weaknesses are mutually compared. The paper is concluded with some retrospective and prospective remarks.

Suggested Citation

  • Nijkamp, Peter, 1999. "Advances in comparative assessment research in the space-economy," Serie Research Memoranda 0005, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    • Handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:1999-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://degree.ubvu.vu.nl/repec/vua/wpaper/pdf/19990005.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberta Capello & Peter Nijkamp & Gerard Pepping, 1999. "Sustainable Cities and Energy Policies," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-662-03833-8, February.
    2. Yee Leung, 1997. "Intelligent Spatial Decision Support Systems," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-642-60714-1, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Nijkamp & Gabriella Vindigni, 1999. "A Multi-Dimensional Comparative Assessment Methodology for Policy Analysis: A Multi-Country Study of the Agricultural Sector," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 99-035/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    2. Jaryn Bradford & Evan D. G. Fraser, 2008. "Local authorities, climate change and small and medium enterprises: identifying effective policy instruments to reduce energy use and carbon emissions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 156-172, May.
    3. Keirstead, James & Schulz, Niels B., 2010. "London and beyond: Taking a closer look at urban energy policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 4870-4879, September.
    4. Peter Nijkamp & Gabriella Vindigni, 2000. "Food Security and Agricultural Sustainability - A Comparative Multi-Country Assessment of Critical Success Factors," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 00-070/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    5. Frans Bal & Peter Nijkamp, 1998. "Winners and Losers in Spatial Duopoly Markets; the Relevance of a Value Transfer Approach," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-004/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    6. Kourtit Karima & Nijkamp Peter & Scholten Henk, 2023. "Planning for Climate–Benign Cities – Design of a Mind Map for Smart Energy Transition," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 61(1), pages 41-61, March.
    7. Jochem van der Waals & Walter Vermeulen, 2002. "The Carbon Dioxide Reduction Workshop: Dutch Experiences with a Participatory Approach," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 549-569.
    8. Robert Stimson & Roger Stough & Peter Nijkamp, 2011. "Endogenous Regional Development," Chapters, in: Robert Stimson & Roger R. Stough & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Endogenous Regional Development, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Kyushik Oh & Yeunwoo Jeong, 2002. "The Usefulness of the GIS—Fuzzy Set Approach in Evaluating the Urban Residential Environment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 29(4), pages 589-606, August.
    10. Jochem F M van der Waals & Walter J V Vermeulen & Pieter Glasbergen, 2003. "Carbon Dioxide Reduction in Housing: Experiences in Urban Renewal Projects in the Netherlands," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 21(3), pages 411-427, June.
    11. Baycan-Levent, Tuzin & Nijkamp, Peter, 2007. "Critical success factors in planning and management of urban green spaces in europe," Serie Research Memoranda 0010, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    12. Aliye Ahu Akgün & Seda Kundak & Handan Turkoglu & Tuzin Baycan, 2011. "Rural changes: Their types and effects on rural capital," ERSA conference papers ersa11p251, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Jonathan Rutherford & Olivier Coutard, 2014. "Urban Energy Transitions: Places, Processes and Politics of Socio-technical Change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(7), pages 1353-1377, May.
    14. Peter Nijkamp, 2008. "Xxq Factors For Sustainable Urban Development: A Systems Economics View," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Anna Nagurney, 2015. "Design of Sustainable Supply Chains for Sustainable Cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 42(1), pages 40-57, February.
    16. Anthony G O Yeh & Jimmy J Qiao, 2004. "Component-Based Approach in the Development of a Knowledge-Based Planning Support System (KBPSS). Part 1: The Architecture of KBPSS," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 31(4), pages 517-537, August.
    17. Akgun, A.A. & Leeuwen, E.S. van & Nijkamp, P., 2011. "A systemic perspective on multi-stakeholder sustainable development strategies," Serie Research Memoranda 0009, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    18. Burch, Sarah, 2010. "In pursuit of resilient, low carbon communities: An examination of barriers to action in three Canadian cities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 7575-7585, December.
    19. Rebecca C W Kwok & Anthony G O Yeh, 2004. "The Use of Modal Accessibility Gap as an Indicator for Sustainable Transport Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(5), pages 921-936, May.
    20. Akgün, Aliye Ahu & van Leeuwen, Eveline & Nijkamp, Peter, 2012. "A multi-actor multi-criteria scenario analysis of regional sustainable resource policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 19-28.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L98 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Government Policy
    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General
    • R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:1999-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: R. Dam (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fewvunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.