IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/usi/wpaper/705.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Certain Amount of ‘Recantation'. On the Origins of Frank H. Knight’s Antipositivism

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Fiorito

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate in some detail the origins of Knight’s antipositism and to assess the main influences that brought him to a change in methodological perspective after 1921. As importantly, what follows is also an attempt to increase our general understanding of the methodological debates taking place during the early decades of the last century and to shed new light on the inherently pluralistic character of US interwar economics. This paper is organized as follows: the first section outlines Knight’s methodological views as presented in his early works; the second section discusses Knight’s “recantation” and his attack on behavioristic social science; the third section analyze Knight’s discussion of the nature and limitations of scientific economics; the fourth section offers a brief digression on Knight’s relationship with American institutionalism; the fifth section deals with the later developments of Knight’s antipositivism; the final section presents some conclusions

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Fiorito, 2015. "A Certain Amount of ‘Recantation'. On the Origins of Frank H. Knight’s Antipositivism," Department of Economics University of Siena 705, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
  • Handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.deps.unisi.it/quaderni/705.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank H. Knight, 1922. "Ethics and the Economic Interpretation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 36(3), pages 454-481.
    2. Ross Emmett, 2009. "Realism and relevance in the economics of a free society: the Knight-Hutchison debate," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 341-350.
    3. Jacob Viner, 1925. "The Utility Concept in Value Theory and Its Critics," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(4), pages 369-369.
    4. Luca Fiorito, 2009. "Frank H. Knight, pragmatism, and American institutionalism: A note," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 475-487.
    5. Jacob Viner, 1925. "The Utility Concept in Value Theory and Its Critics," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(6), pages 638-638.
    6. Pier Francesco Asso & Luca Fiorito, 2008. "Was Frank Knight an Institutionalist?," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 59-77.
    7. F. H. Knight, 1917. "The Concept of Normal Price in Value and Distribution," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 32(1), pages 66-100.
    8. Asso, Pier Francesco & Fiorito, Luca, 2004. "Human Nature and Economic Institutions: Instinct Psychology, Behaviorism, and the Development of American Institutionalism," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(4), pages 445-477, December.
    9. Torsten Schmidt & Christian E. Weber, 2012. "Andreas Heinrich Voigt And The Hicks-Allen Revolution In Consumer Theory," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 50(3), pages 625-640, July.
    10. Lawrence K. Frank, 1923. "A Theory of Business Cycles," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 37(4), pages 625-642.
    11. Pier Francesco Asso & Luca Fiorito, 2004. "Lawrence Kelso Frank's Proto-Ayresian Dichotomy," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 36(3), pages 557-578, Fall.
    12. Frank H. Knight, 1923. "Some Books on Fundamentals," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(3), pages 342-342.
    13. Frank H. Knight, 1925. "Economic Psychology and the Value Problem," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 39(3), pages 372-409.
    14. Ross B. Emmett, 2010. "Frank H. Knight," Chapters, in: Ross B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Frank H. Knight, 1944. "Realism and Relevance in the Theory of Demand," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 52(4), pages 289-289.
    16. D. Wade Hands, 2006. "Frank Knight and pragmatism," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 571-605.
    17. Shira B. Lewin, 1996. "Economics and Psychology: Lessons for Our Own Day from the Early Twentieth Century," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 1293-1323, September.
    18. Frank H. Knight, 1941. "The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory: A Rejoinder," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49(5), pages 750-750.
    19. Eva & Abraham Hirsch, 1975. "The Heterodox Methodology of Two Chicago Economists," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 645-664, December.
    20. Frank H. Knight, 1932. "The Newer Economics and the Control of Economic Activity," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(4), pages 433-433.
    21. Knight, Frank H., 1922. "Ethics and the Economic Interpretation," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 36, pages 454-481, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pier Francesco Asso & Luca Fiorito, 2008. "Was Frank Knight an Institutionalist?," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 59-77.
    2. Luca Fiorito & Massimiliano Vatiero, 2021. "Frank H. Knight on social values in economic consumption: an archival note," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 126-141, January.
    3. Milan Zafirovski, 2024. "Contradictions of the Marginal Utility Theory of Value? Identifying Some Logical Errors," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2024(1), pages 53-98.
    4. Luca Fiorito & Sebastiano Nerozzi, 2016. "Chicago Economics in the Making, 1926-1940. A Further Look at US Interwar Pluralism," Department of Economics University of Siena 733, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    5. Atsebi, Jean-Marc Bédhat & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada, 2019. "Relative Deprivation in Tanzania," IZA Discussion Papers 12719, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Gabriel Leite Mota, 2007. "Why Should Happiness Have a Role in Welfare Economics? Happiness versus Orthodoxy and Capabilities," FEP Working Papers 253, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    7. Matson, Erik W., 2021. "Satisfaction in action: Hume's endogenous theory of preferences and the virtues of commerce," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 849-860.
    8. Jack Hirshleifer, 1978. "Natural Economy Versus Political Economy," UCLA Economics Working Papers 114, UCLA Department of Economics.
    9. Atsebi, Jean-Marc Bédhat & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada, 2022. "Relative deprivation in Tanzania: Relative concerns and empathy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 389-408.
    10. Malakhov, Sergey, 2012. "К Вопросу О Возможности Синтеза Концепции Удовлетворяющего Поиска И Неоклассической Доктрины [A note on the synthesis of the satisficing concept and the neoclassical theory]," MPRA Paper 49494, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Zoya Mladenova, 2005. "XX Century and the Evolution of the Economic Theory (Neoclassical Theory: Development of Microeconomics)," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 3-23.
    12. Galbács, Péter, 2019. "A chicagonomics és a közgazdaságtan imperializmusa ["Chicagonomics" and the imperialism of economics]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 229-255.
    13. Spender, J. C., 2024. "Simon and Knight," MPRA Paper 120891, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Ivan Moscati, 2012. "How cardinal utility entered economic analysis during the Ordinal RevolutionLength: 31 pages," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf1205, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.
    15. Åsbjørn Melkevik, 2019. "A Theory of Business Eunomics: The Means–Ends Relation in Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 293-305, November.
    16. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada, 2005. "Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(5-6), pages 997-1019, June.
    17. G. R. Steele, 2004. "Understanding Economic Man," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(5), pages 1021-1055, November.
    18. Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell, 2013. "Happiness economics," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 4(1), pages 35-60, March.
    19. Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell, 2002. "Income and Well-being," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-019/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    20. Levy, David M. & Peart, Sandra J., 2009. "Sympathy, evolution, and The Economist," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 29-36, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Knight; Frank; Economic methodology; Economics and physics; American institutionalism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General
    • B21 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Microeconomics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabrizio Becatti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desieit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.