IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/upf/upfgen/1617.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

eSports: profile of participants, complementarity with sports and its perception as sport. Evidence from sports video games

Author

Abstract

Research question: This study investigates three issues associated to the growing industry of eSports: the picture of participants in eSports and the correlates of the intensity of this participation; the complementary/substitutability relationship between eSports and traditional sports; and the perception of eSports as sport by the population. Research methods: Discrete choice, two-part and regression models are estimated using a sample of 11,018 individuals from the Survey on Sports Habits in Spain 2015. Results and Findings: The association of the correlates follows different patterns depending on whether considering participation or the intensity of this participation in eSports and also in terms of gender. Using different approaches, a significant degree of complementarity between participation and interest in eSports and traditional sports is estimated. For young people interested in eSports seems to an element influencing the overall interest in sports. Implications: Taking into account the different association of the correlates with the participation and the intensity of participation in eSports, this information could be used by firms in order to define marketing and brand investment strategies. The estimated complementarity between eSports and traditional sports should influence how the actual stakeholders in traditional sports define future strategies to favour the growth of both industries. The fact that eSports is increasingly perceived as a sport should have an influence, among others, in the collection of data on sports habits, in the way these activities are regulated and in the organization of multi-sport events, like the Olympic Games.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaume Garcia Villar & Carles Murillo, 2018. "eSports: profile of participants, complementarity with sports and its perception as sport. Evidence from sports video games," Economics Working Papers 1617, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    • Handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:1617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econ-papers.upf.edu/papers/1617.pdf
    File Function: Whole Paper
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madden, David, 2008. "Sample selection versus two-part models revisited: The case of female smoking and drinking," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 300-307, March.
    2. Petr Parshakov & Dennis Coates & Marina Zavertiaeva, 2018. "Is diversity good or bad? Evidence from eSports teams analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(47), pages 5064-5075, October.
    3. Dennis Coates & Petr Parshakov, 2016. "Team Vs. Individual Tournaments: Evidence From Prize Structure In Esports," HSE Working papers WP BRP 138/EC/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Seo, Yuri, 2016. "Professionalized consumption and identity transformations in the field of eSports," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 264-272.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nufer, Gerd, 2020. "e-Sports: was es ist und wie es sich entwickelt," Reutlingen Working Papers on Marketing & Management 2020-1, Reutlingen University, ESB Business School.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parshakov, Petr & Naidenova, Iuliia & Barajas, Angel, 2020. "Spillover effect in promotion: Evidence from video game publishers and eSports tournaments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 262-270.
    2. Dennis Coates & Petr Parshakov & Sofia Paklina, 2020. "Do Managers Matter: Evidence From E‐Sports," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 38(2), pages 304-312, April.
    3. Niculaescu, Corina-Elena & Sangiorgi, Ivan & Bell, Adrian R., 2023. "Venture capital financing in the eSports industry," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    4. Nicolas Scelles & Qi Peng & Maurizio Valenti, 2021. "Do the Peculiar Economics of Professional Team Sports Apply to Esports? Sequential Snowballing Literature Reviews and Implications," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Dorotic, Matilda & Verhoef, Peter C. & Fok, Dennis & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A., 2014. "Reward redemption effects in a loyalty program when customers choose how much and when to redeem," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 339-355.
    6. Myck, Michal & Nici?ska, Anna & Morawski, Leszek, 2009. "Count Your Hours: Returns to Education in Poland," IZA Discussion Papers 4332, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Kostova, Deliana & Dave, Dhaval, 2015. "Smokeless tobacco use in India: Role of prices and advertising," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 82-90.
    8. Mehtabul Azam, 2016. "Private Tutoring: Evidence from India," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 739-761, November.
    9. Marcelo Leon & Miriam Vanessa Hinojosa-Ramos & Alan León-Lopez & Simone Belli & Cristian López-Raventós & Hector Florez, 2022. "eSports Events Trend: A Promising Opportunity for Tourism Offerings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Odermatt, Reto & Stutzer, Alois, 2018. "Tobacco Control Policies and Smoking Behavior in Europe: More Than Trends?," Working papers 2018/24, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    11. McGovern, Mark E. & Canning, David & Bärnighausen, Till, 2018. "Accounting for non-response bias using participation incentives and survey design: An application using gift vouchers," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 239-244.
    12. Fu, Shengfei & Florkowski, Wojciech, 2016. "Polish Household Consumption of Tobacco and Alcohol: A Censored System," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 229795, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    13. García, Jaume & Suárez, María José, 2023. "The relevance of specification assumptions when analyzing the drivers of physical activity practice," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Andrea Essl & Frauke von Bieberstein & Michael Kosfeld & Markus Kröll, 2018. "Sales Performance and Social Preferences," CESifo Working Paper Series 7030, CESifo.
    15. Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2023. "Comparisons of observed and unobserved parameter heterogeneity in modeling vehicle-miles driven," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    16. Becker, Randy A. & Pasurka, Carl & Shadbegian, Ronald J., 2013. "Do environmental regulations disproportionately affect small businesses? Evidence from the Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures survey," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 523-538.
    17. Mohammad Abu-Zaineh & Olivier Chanel & Khaled Makhloufi, "undated". "Accounting for Protest Attitudes in Willingness to Pay for Universal Health Coverage," AMSE Working Papers 1854, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    18. Reneé van Eyden, 2012. "Consumer demand for alcoholic beverages and tobacco in Lesotho: A double-hurdle approach," Working Papers 315, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    19. Benjamin J. McMichael & W. Kip Viscusi, 2017. "The Punitive Damages Calculus: The Differential Incidence of State Punitive Damages Reforms," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(1), pages 82-97, July.
    20. Marwan Benali & Bernhard Brümmer & Victor Afari‐Sefa, 2018. "Smallholder participation in vegetable exports and age‐disaggregated labor allocation in Northern Tanzania," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(5), pages 549-562, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    eSports; discrete choice models; two-part model; complementarity; perception as sport.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions; Probabilities
    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:1617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econ.upf.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.