IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unm/unuint/200201.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

TRIPs and Capability Building in Developing Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Rasiah, Rajah

    (United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies)

Abstract

This paper argues that three major issues need to be addressed when examining the effects of the WTO's TRIPs agreement on capability building in developing economies. First, the agreement looks at seven instruments, which have both common as well as differing implications for capability building in developing economies. Second, four major theoretical arguments address the agreement, i.e. market-oriented, regulation, path-dependent knowledge dynamics and network synergies, and public and basic good characteristics of certain IPRs. Third, the capacity of economies to participate actively in the agreement depends on basic and high tech capabilities. The LIDEs have neither the basic infrastructure to ensure compliance nor the high tech infrastructure to support innovative activities. The Asian NIEs - especially the Republic of Korea - enjoy strong high tech and innovative capabilities. The second-tier NIEs and Latin American NIEs are generally endowed with strong basic infrastructure to strengthen compliance, but lack the high tech infrastructure to support innovative activities. Indeed, The LIDEs on average show higher levels of high tech infrastructure and resident patents than the second-tier NIEs. However, Indonesia and Philippines face serious shortcomings even in basic infrastructure

Suggested Citation

  • Rasiah, Rajah, 2002. "TRIPs and Capability Building in Developing Economies," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2002-01, United Nations University - INTECH.
    • Handle: RePEc:unm:unuint:200201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/discussion-papers/2002-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romer, Paul M, 1986. "Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(5), pages 1002-1037, October.
    2. Jerry R. Green & Suzanne Scotchmer, 1995. "On the Division of Profit in Sequential Innovation," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 26(1), pages 20-33, Spring.
    3. Bastos, Maria-Inês, 1995. "Telecommunication Industry in Brazil: Public-Private Relationship and Technology Development," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1995-03, United Nations University - INTECH.
    4. Moses Abramovitz, 1956. "Resource and Output Trends in the United States since 1870," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number abra56-1.
    5. Narayanan, K., 1998. "Technology acquisition, de-regulation and competitiveness: a study of Indian automobile industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 215-228, June.
    6. Sanjaya Lall, 2001. "Competitiveness, Technology and Skills," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2298.
    7. Moses Abramovitz, 1956. "Resource and Output Trends in the United States since 1870," NBER Chapters, in: Resource and Output Trends in the United States since 1870, pages 1-23, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Kathuria, Vinish, 1998. "Foreign Firms and Technology Transfer Knowledge Spillovers to Indian Manufacturing Firms," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1998-04, United Nations University - INTECH.
    9. Marshall, Alfred, 1920. "Industry and Trade," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, edition 3, number marshall1920.
    10. Scherer, F M, 1972. "Nordhaus' Theory of Optimal Patent Life: A Geometric Reinterpretation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(3), pages 422-427, June.
    11. Sanjaya Lall, 1996. "Learning from the Asian Tigers," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-38989-2, October.
    12. Mazzoleni, Roberto & Nelson, Richard R., 1998. "The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 273-284, July.
    13. Edwin Mansfield, 1986. "Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 173-181, February.
    14. Vinish Kathuria, 1998. "Technology Transfer and Spillovers for Indian Manufacturing Firms," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 16(1), pages 73-91, March.
    15. Mani, Sunil, 1999. "Public Innovation Policies and Developing Countries In a Phase of Economic Liberalisation," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1999-02, United Nations University - INTECH.
    16. Cooper, Charles, 1995. "Technology, Manufactured Exports and Competitiveness," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1995-13, United Nations University - INTECH.
    17. Richard C. Levin & Alvin K. Klevorick & Richard R. Nelson & Sidney G. Winter, 1987. "Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 18(3, Specia), pages 783-832.
    18. Jenkins, Rhys, 1998. "Environmental Regulation and International Competitiveness: A Review of Literature and Some European Evidence," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1998-01, United Nations University - INTECH.
    19. Kim,Linsu & Nelson,Richard R. (ed.), 2000. "Technology, Learning, and Innovation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521770033, September.
    20. Best, Michael, 2001. "The New Competitive Advantage: The Renewal of American Industry," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198297451.
    21. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1988. "On the mechanics of economic development," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 3-42, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nour, Samia Satti O. M., 2005. "Science and Technology Development Indicators in the Arab Region: A Comparative Study of Gulf and Mediterranean Arab Countries," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2005-03, United Nations University - INTECH.
    2. Nour, Samia Satti Osman Mohamed, 2013. "Regional systems of innovation in the Arab region," MERIT Working Papers 2013-012, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    3. Nour, Samia, 2011. "Arab regional systems of innovation: characteristics and implications," MERIT Working Papers 2011-058, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    4. Nour, Samia Satti Osman Mohamed, 2010. "Assessment of science and technology indicators in Sudan," MERIT Working Papers 2010-062, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    5. Samia Nour, 2014. "Regional Systems of Innovation and Economic Structure in the Arab Region," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(3), pages 481-520, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ha-Joon Chang & Ali Cheema & L. Mises, 2002. "Conditions For Successful Technology Policy In Developing Countries—Learning Rents, State Structures, And Institutions," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4-5), pages 369-398.
    2. Kim, Linsu, 2000. "The Dynamics of Technological Learning in Industrialisation," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2000-07, United Nations University - INTECH.
    3. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, Banji, 2001. "Networks and Linkages in African Manufacturing Cluster: A Nigerian Case Study," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-05, United Nations University - INTECH.
    4. Anthony Bartzokas & Morris Teubal, 2002. "A Framework for Policy Oriented Innovation Studies in Industrialising Countries," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4-5), pages 477-496.
    5. Mani, Sunil, 2000. "Policy Instruments for Stimulating R&D in the Enterprise Sector: The Contrasting Experiences of Two MNC Dominated Economies from Southeast Asia," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2000-09, United Nations University - INTECH.
    6. Ganeshan Wignaraja, 2002. "Firm Size, Technological Capabilities and Market-oriented Policies in Mauritius," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 87-104.
    7. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, Banji & Adeya, Catherine Nyaki, 2002. "Internet Access in Africa: An Empirical Exploration," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2002-05, United Nations University - INTECH.
    8. Harabi, Najib, 1994. "Technischer Fortschritt in der Schweiz: Empirische Ergebnisse aus industrieökonomischer Sicht [Technischer Fortschritt in der Schweiz:Empirische Ergebnisse aus industrieökonomischer Sicht]," MPRA Paper 6725, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Sunil Mani & Anthony Bartzokas, 2004. "Institutional support for investment in new technologies: the role of venture capital institutions in developing countries," Chapters, in: Anthony Bartzokas & Sunil Mani (ed.), Financial Systems, Corporate Investment in Innovation, and Venture Capital, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Mani, Sunil, 2001. "Role of Government in Promoting Innovation in the Enterprise Sector An Analysis of the Indian Experience," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-03, United Nations University - INTECH.
    11. Mani, Sunil, 2001. "Government, Innovation and Technology Policy, An Analysis of the Brazilian Experience during the 1990s," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-11, United Nations University - INTECH.
    12. Mytelka, Lynn & Farinelli, Fulvia, 2000. "Local Clusters, Innovation Systems and Sustained Competitiveness," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2000-05, United Nations University - INTECH.
    13. Mani, Sunil, 2001. "Government and Innovation Policy An Analysis of the South African Experience since 1994," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-02, United Nations University - INTECH.
    14. Clark, Norman, 2001. "Innovation Systems, Institutional Change and the New Knowledge Market: Implications for Third World Agricultural Development," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-10, United Nations University - INTECH.
    15. Bastos, Maria-Ines & Steinmueller, Edward, 1995. "Information and Communication Technologies: Growth, Competitiveness, and Policy for Developing Nations," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1995-11, United Nations University - INTECH.
    16. Mohan Babu, G.N., 1999. "The Determinants of Firm-level Technological Performances - A Study on the Indian Capital Goods Sector," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1999-01, United Nations University - INTECH.
    17. Mani, Sunil, 2001. "Working with the Market: The Israeli Experience of Promoting R&D in the Enterprise Sector and the Lessons for Developing Countries," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-09, United Nations University - INTECH.
    18. Cooper, Charles, 1995. "Technological Change and Dual Economies," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1995-10, United Nations University - INTECH.
    19. Mani, Sunil, 2000. "Exports of High Technology Products from Developing Countries: Is it Real or a Statistical Artifact?," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2000-01, United Nations University - INTECH.
    20. Gu, Shulin, 1999. "Implications Of National Innovation Systems For Developing Countries: Managing Change And Complexity In Economic Development," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1999-03, United Nations University - INTECH.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    World Trade Organisation; Trade; Intellectual Property Rights; Capability Building; Innovation; Developing Economies;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unm:unuint:200201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ad Notten (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/meritnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.