IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unm/unuint/200103.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Role of Government in Promoting Innovation in the Enterprise Sector An Analysis of the Indian Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Mani, Sunil

    (United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies)

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to analyse the role of the Indian state in promoting innovations in enterprise or manufacturing sector. The country's manufacturing sector is dominated by the Chemicals and pharmaceutical sector which also accounts for the largest share in R&D investments and in the number of patents granted. The paper begins by mapping out the broad external environment within which innovative activities of firms are encouraged. This environment consists of a series of policies. A detailed analysis of them showed that policies lack specificity in targets, the time dimension and budget. Four possible dimensions of the innovation system are considered, namely the (a) policies with respect to the supply of technically trained human resource for R&D; (b) the physical technological infrastructure; (c) fiscal incentives for encouraging innovation; and (d) promotion of technology-based ventures through venture capital funds. The country suffers from a chronic shortage of research scientists and engineers of the type that is required for R&D. The basic cause of this could be traced to the quality of science and engineering education in the country and to the ever-increasing brain drain. A network of government research institutes, which have been undergoing a major restructuring, specifically since 1996, dominates the physical technological infrastructure. However they continue to depend upon governmental grants and projects for their sustenance and their interaction with the domestic manufacturing sector is very limited. India does not have any major research grant schemes and even the one that it has, in actual operation, is directed largely at public sector enterprises. Most of the schemes are research loan schemes. In other words the extent of public subsidies for private sector R&D is quite low in the country. The country has a variety of direct and indirect tax incentives for R&D. However both a macro and micro exercise revealed that most enterprises do not perceive its existence as important. In most cases the level of R&D performed would be the same even in the absence of direct tax incentives. Finally an examination of the operation of venture capital funds showed that they conform to the ideal model of providing, by and large, equity support to technology-based ventures in their early stages. The paper also makes some critical comments on the quality of India's R&D statistics and makes suggestions for their improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Mani, Sunil, 2001. "Role of Government in Promoting Innovation in the Enterprise Sector An Analysis of the Indian Experience," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-03, United Nations University - INTECH.
  • Handle: RePEc:unm:unuint:200103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/discussion-papers/2001-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean O. Lanjouw, 1997. "Title: The Introduction of Pharmaceutical Product Patents in India: Heartless Exploitation of the Poor and Suffering," Working Papers 775, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    2. Lanjouw, J.O., 1997. "The Introduction of Pharmaceutical Product Patents in India: "Heartless Exploitation of the Poor and Suffering"?," Papers 775, Yale - Economic Growth Center.
    3. Mani, Sunil, 2000. "Exports of High Technology Products from Developing Countries: Is it Real or a Statistical Artifact?," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2000-01, United Nations University - INTECH.
    4. Bastos, Maria-InĂªs, 1995. "Telecommunication Industry in Brazil: Public-Private Relationship and Technology Development," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1995-03, United Nations University - INTECH.
    5. Mani, Sunil, 2000. "Policy Instruments for Stimulating R&D in the Enterprise Sector: The Contrasting Experiences of Two MNC Dominated Economies from Southeast Asia," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2000-09, United Nations University - INTECH.
    6. Narayanan, K., 1998. "Technology acquisition, de-regulation and competitiveness: a study of Indian automobile industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 215-228, June.
    7. World Bank, 2000. "Scientific and Technical Manpower Development in India," World Bank Publications - Reports 14983, The World Bank Group.
    8. Kathuria, Vinish, 1998. "Foreign Firms and Technology Transfer Knowledge Spillovers to Indian Manufacturing Firms," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1998-04, United Nations University - INTECH.
    9. Vinish Kathuria, 1998. "Technology Transfer and Spillovers for Indian Manufacturing Firms," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 16(1), pages 73-91, March.
    10. Mani, Sunil, 1999. "Public Innovation Policies and Developing Countries In a Phase of Economic Liberalisation," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1999-02, United Nations University - INTECH.
    11. Cooper, Charles, 1995. "Technology, Manufactured Exports and Competitiveness," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1995-13, United Nations University - INTECH.
    12. Jenkins, Rhys, 1998. "Environmental Regulation and International Competitiveness: A Review of Literature and Some European Evidence," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1998-01, United Nations University - INTECH.
    13. World Bank, 2000. "World Development Indicators 2000," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13828.
    14. Mr. William Carrington & Ms. Enrica Detragiache, 1998. "How Big is the Brain Drain?," IMF Working Papers 1998/102, International Monetary Fund.
    15. Mani, Sunil, 2001. "Government and Innovation Policy An Analysis of the South African Experience since 1994," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-02, United Nations University - INTECH.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. World Bank, 2005. "India : India and the Knowledge Economy, Leveraging Strengths and Opportunities," World Bank Publications - Reports 8565, The World Bank Group.
    2. D. Varaprasad Sekhar, 2005. "Science and Technology Cooperation between India and China," International Studies, , vol. 42(3-4), pages 307-327, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mani, Sunil, 2001. "Government and Innovation Policy An Analysis of the South African Experience since 1994," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-02, United Nations University - INTECH.
    2. Mani, Sunil, 2000. "Policy Instruments for Stimulating R&D in the Enterprise Sector: The Contrasting Experiences of Two MNC Dominated Economies from Southeast Asia," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2000-09, United Nations University - INTECH.
    3. Ganeshan Wignaraja, 2002. "Firm Size, Technological Capabilities and Market-oriented Policies in Mauritius," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 87-104.
    4. Sunil Mani & Anthony Bartzokas, 2004. "Institutional support for investment in new technologies: the role of venture capital institutions in developing countries," Chapters, in: Anthony Bartzokas & Sunil Mani (ed.), Financial Systems, Corporate Investment in Innovation, and Venture Capital, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Mani, Sunil, 2001. "Government, Innovation and Technology Policy, An Analysis of the Brazilian Experience during the 1990s," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-11, United Nations University - INTECH.
    6. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, Banji & Adeya, Catherine Nyaki, 2002. "Internet Access in Africa: An Empirical Exploration," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2002-05, United Nations University - INTECH.
    7. Ha-Joon Chang & Ali Cheema & L. Mises, 2002. "Conditions For Successful Technology Policy In Developing Countries—Learning Rents, State Structures, And Institutions," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4-5), pages 369-398.
    8. Rasiah, Rajah, 2002. "TRIPs and Capability Building in Developing Economies," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2002-01, United Nations University - INTECH.
    9. Kim, Linsu, 2000. "The Dynamics of Technological Learning in Industrialisation," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2000-07, United Nations University - INTECH.
    10. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, Banji, 2001. "Networks and Linkages in African Manufacturing Cluster: A Nigerian Case Study," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-05, United Nations University - INTECH.
    11. Anthony Bartzokas & Morris Teubal, 2002. "A Framework for Policy Oriented Innovation Studies in Industrialising Countries," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4-5), pages 477-496.
    12. Mytelka, Lynn & Farinelli, Fulvia, 2000. "Local Clusters, Innovation Systems and Sustained Competitiveness," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2000-05, United Nations University - INTECH.
    13. Mani, Sunil, 2001. "Working with the Market: The Israeli Experience of Promoting R&D in the Enterprise Sector and the Lessons for Developing Countries," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-09, United Nations University - INTECH.
    14. Clark, Norman, 2001. "Innovation Systems, Institutional Change and the New Knowledge Market: Implications for Third World Agricultural Development," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2001-10, United Nations University - INTECH.
    15. Bastos, Maria-Ines & Steinmueller, Edward, 1995. "Information and Communication Technologies: Growth, Competitiveness, and Policy for Developing Nations," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1995-11, United Nations University - INTECH.
    16. Mohan Babu, G.N., 1999. "The Determinants of Firm-level Technological Performances - A Study on the Indian Capital Goods Sector," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1999-01, United Nations University - INTECH.
    17. Cooper, Charles, 1995. "Technological Change and Dual Economies," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1995-10, United Nations University - INTECH.
    18. Mani, Sunil, 2000. "Exports of High Technology Products from Developing Countries: Is it Real or a Statistical Artifact?," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2000-01, United Nations University - INTECH.
    19. Gu, Shulin, 1999. "Implications Of National Innovation Systems For Developing Countries: Managing Change And Complexity In Economic Development," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1999-03, United Nations University - INTECH.
    20. repec:ilo:ilowps:366690 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Piva, Mariacristina., 2004. "The impact of technology transfer on employment and income distribution in developing countries : a survey of theoretical models and empirical studies," ILO Working Papers 993666903402676, International Labour Organization.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research and Development; Innovation Policy; Government Policy; India;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unm:unuint:200103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ad Notten (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/meritnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.