Experimental economics : economic and game theoretic principles in experimental research in the social sciences
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.26481/umamet.2012001
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Nicholas Bardsley & Robin Cubitt & Graham Loomes & Peter Moffatt & Chris Starmer & Robert Sugden, 2009. "Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 9074.
- James C. Cox & Vjollca Sadiraj & Bodo Vogt & Utteeyo Dasgupta, 2007. "Is There A Plausible Theory for Risky Decisions?," Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series 2007-05, Experimental Economics Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, revised Jun 2012.
- Tibor Neugebauer, 2010. "Moral Impossibility in the Petersburg Paradox : A Literature Survey and Experimental Evidence," LSF Research Working Paper Series 10-14, Luxembourg School of Finance, University of Luxembourg.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Galliera, Arianna, 2018.
"Self-selecting random or cumulative pay? A bargaining experiment,"
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 106-120.
- Arianna Galliera, 2016. "Self-Selecting Random or Cumulative Pay? A Bargaining Experiment," Working Papers CESARE 2/2016, Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza, LUISS Guido Carli.
- Giovanni Bartolomeo & Stefano Papa, 2016.
"Trust and reciprocity: extensions and robustness of triadic design,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 19(1), pages 100-115, March.
- Giovanni Bartolomeo & Stefano Papa, 2016. "Trust and reciprocity: extensions and robustness of triadic design," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 19(1), pages 100-115, March.
- Di Bartolomeo Giovanni & Papa Stefano, 2014. "Trust and reciprocity: Extensions and robustness of triadic design," wp.comunite 0111, Department of Communication, University of Teramo.
- Volker Gadenne, 2013. "External Validity and the New Inductivism in Experimental Economics," Rationality, Markets and Morals, Frankfurt School Verlag, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, vol. 4(63), March.
- Sophie Massin & Antoine Nebout & Bruno Ventelou, 2018.
"Predicting medical practices using various risk attitude measures,"
The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(6), pages 843-860, July.
- Sophie Massin & Antoine Nebout & Bruno Ventelou, 2018. "Predicting medical practices using various risk attitude measures," Post-Print hal-01744600, HAL.
- Blair Cleave & Nikos Nikiforakis & Robert Slonim, 2013.
"Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 16(3), pages 372-382, September.
- Cleave, Blair L. & Nikiforakis, Nikos & Slonim, Robert, 2011. "Is There Selection Bias in Laboratory Experiments? The Case of Social and Risk Preferences," IZA Discussion Papers 5488, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Nikos Nikiforakis & Blair L. Cleave & Robert Slonim, 2013. "Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences," Post-Print halshs-00943212, HAL.
- Chen, Daniel L. & Schonger, Martin & Wickens, Chris, 2016.
"oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments,"
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 88-97.
- Chen, Daniel Li & Schonger, Martin & Wickens, Chris, 2015. "oTree - An Open-Source Platform for Laboratory, Online, and Field Experiments," MPRA Paper 62730, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Attema, Arthur E. & l’Haridon, Olivier & van de Kuilen, Gijs, 2019.
"Measuring multivariate risk preferences in the health domain,"
Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 15-24.
- Arthur Attema & Olivier L’haridon & Gijs van de Kuilen, 2019. "Measuring Multivariate Risk Preferences in the Health Domain," Post-Print halshs-01970236, HAL.
- Barmettler, Franziska & Fehr, Ernst & Zehnder, Christian, 2012.
"Big experimenter is watching you! Anonymity and prosocial behavior in the laboratory,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 17-34.
- Barmettler, Franziska & Fehr, Ernst & Zehnder, Christian, 2011. "Big Experimenter Is Watching You! Anonymity and Prosocial Behavior in the Laboratory," IZA Discussion Papers 5925, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Franziska Barmettler & Ernst Fehr & Christian Zehnder, 2011. "Big experimenter is watching you! Anonymity and prosocial behavior in the laboratory," ECON - Working Papers 027, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
- Adriana Gabriela Breaban & Juan Carlos Matallín-Sáez & Iván Barreda-Tarrazona & Mª Rosario Balaguer-Franch, 2012. "The demand for structured products: an experimental approach," Working Papers 2012/15, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
- Guala, Francesco & Mittone, Luigi & Ploner, Matteo, 2013. "Group membership, team preferences, and expectations," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 183-190.
- Attema, Arthur E. & L'Haridon, Olivier & van de Kuilen, Gijs, 2023.
"Decomposing social risk preferences for health and wealth,"
Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
- Arthur E. Attema & Olivier L'Haridon & Gijs van de Kuilen, 2023. "Decomposing social risk preferences for health and wealth," Post-Print hal-04116983, HAL.
- Sanjit Dhami & Emma Manifold & Ali al-Nowaihi, 2018. "Prosociality, Political Identity, and Redistribution of Earned Income: Theory and Evidence," CESifo Working Paper Series 7256, CESifo.
- Mohammed Abdellaoui & Han Bleichrodt & Hilda Kammoun, 2013.
"Do financial professionals behave according to prospect theory? An experimental study,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 411-429, March.
- Mohammed Abdellaoui & Han Bleichrodt & Hilda Kammoun, 2013. "Do financial professionals behave according to prospect theory? An experimental study," Post-Print hal-01069185, HAL.
- Ruggero Paladini, 2017. "Il paradosso di S. Pietroburgo, una rassegna," Public Finance Research Papers 29, Istituto di Economia e Finanza, DSGE, Sapienza University of Rome.
- Robin Cubitt & Gijs van de Kuilen & Sujoy Mukerji, 2020.
"Discriminating Between Models of Ambiguity Attitude: a Qualitative Test,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 18(2), pages 708-749.
- Sujoy Mukerji & Robin Cubitt & Gijs van de Kuilen, 2014. "Discriminating between Models of Ambiguity Attitude: A Qualitative Test," Economics Series Working Papers 692, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
- Robin Cubitt & Gijs van de Kuilen & Sujoy Mukerji, 2017. "Discriminating between Models of Ambiguity Attitude: A Qualitative Test," Working Papers 831, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
- Giuseppe Attanasi & Samuele Centorrino & Elena Manzoni, 2020.
"Zero-Intelligence vs. Human Agents: An Experimental Analysis of the Efficiency of Double Auctions and Over-the-Counter Markets of Varying Sizes,"
Working Papers
05/2020, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
- Giuseppe Attanasi & Samuele Centorrino & Elena Manzoni, 2020. "Zero-Intelligence vs. Human Agents: An Experimental Analysis of the Efficiency of Double Auctions and Over-the-Counter Markets of Varying Sizes," Department of Economics Working Papers 20-04, Stony Brook University, Department of Economics.
- Giuseppe Attanasi & Samuele Centorrino & Elena Manzoni, 2020. "Zero-Intelligence vs. Human Agents: An Experimental Analysis of the Efficiency of Double Auctions and Over-the-Counter Markets of Varying Sizes," GREDEG Working Papers 2020-10, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
- Mirco Tonin & Michael Vlassopoulos, 2014.
"An experimental investigation of intrinsic motivations for giving,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 47-67, January.
- Tonin, Mirco & Vlassopoulos, Michael, 2011. "An Experimental Investigation of Intrinsic Motivations for Giving," IZA Discussion Papers 5461, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Matteo M. Galizzi & Daniel Navarro-Martinez, 2019.
"On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 976-1002, March.
- Matteo M. Galizzi & Daniel Navarro Martinez, 2015. "On the external validity of social-preference games: A systematic lab-field study," Economics Working Papers 1462, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
- Galizzi, Matteo M. & Navarro-Martínez, Daniel, 2019. "On the external validity of social preference games: a systematic lab-field study," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84088, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Matteo M. Galizzi & Daniel Navarro-Martínez, 2015. "On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study," Working Papers 802, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Page, Lionel & Savage, David A. & Torgler, Benno, 2014. "Variation in risk seeking behaviour following large losses: A natural experiment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 121-131.
- Max Albert & Andreas Hildenbrand, 2012. "Industrial organization in the laboratory," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201205, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unm:umamet:2012001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andrea Willems or Leonne Portz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/meteonl.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.