IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-1711.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On the efficiency of retaliation rules in international trade

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Ginsburgh
  • Shlomo Weber

Abstract

Though retaliation to discriminatory measures taken by a trading partner are made possible by international treaties (GATT and WTO in particular), it is rarely used. We give theoretical reasons for which this has been the case. We also show that the retaliation mechanism which is built into the GATT-WTO rules prevents tariff wars, but does not necessarily lead to free trade. We provide an alternative retaliation rule which yields free trade as the unique equilibrium of the tariff game.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Ginsburgh & Shlomo Weber, 1997. "On the efficiency of retaliation rules in international trade," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/1711, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/1711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/1711/1/efficiency.pdf
    File Function: efficiency
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joachim Zietz, 1989. "Negotiations on GATT Reform and Political Incentives," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 39-52, March.
    2. Hindley, Brian, 1987. "GATT Safeguards and Voluntary Export Restraints: What Are the Interests of Developing Countries?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 1(4), pages 689-705, September.
    3. Martin Wolf, 1989. "Why Voluntary Export Restraints? An Historical Analysis," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 273-292, September.
    4. Bhagwati, Jagdish N., 1976. "Market disruption, export market disruption, compensation and GATT reform," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(12), pages 989-1020, December.
    5. Bhagwati, Jagdish N. & Srinivasan, T. N., 1976. "Optimal trade policy and compensation under endogenous uncertainty: The phenomenon of market disruption," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 317-336, November.
    6. Augustine Tan, 1989. "Payments Imbalances Sudden Surges and Safeguards," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 325-338, September.
    7. Jorge F. Perez-Lopez, 1989. "Case for a GATT Code on Temporary Measures," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 53-68, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benjamin Liebman & Kasaundra Tomlin, 2015. "World Trade Organization sanctions, implementation, and retaliation," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 715-745, March.
    2. Benjamin H. Liebman & Kasaundra M. Tomlin, 2008. "Safeguards and Retaliatory Threats," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 51(2), pages 351-376, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phedon Nicolaides, 1990. "Safeguards and the problem of VERs," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 25(1), pages 18-24, January.
    2. Helpman, Elhanan & Razin, Assaf, 1979. "A Theory of International Trade Under Uncertainty," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780123396501 edited by Shell, Karl.
    3. Yasukazu Ichino, 2013. "Antidumping Petition, Foreign Direct Investment, and Strategic Exports," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(1), pages 22-34, March.
    4. Caruso Raul, 2003. "The Impact of International Economic Sanctions on Trade: An Empirical Analysis," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 1-36, April.
    5. van Bergeijk, Peter A. G. & van Marrewijk, Charles, 1995. "Why do sanctions need time to work? Adjustment, learning and anticipation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 75-86, April.
    6. Bark, Taeho & de Melo, Jaime, 1988. "Export Quota Allocations, Export Earnings, and Market Diversification," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 2(3), pages 341-348, September.
    7. Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman & Hugo Lhuillier, 2021. "Supply Chain Resilience: Should Policy Promote Diversification or Reshoring?," Working Papers 2021-8, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    8. Richard N. Cooper & Jeffrey Sachs, 1984. "Borrowing Abroad: The Debtor's Perspective," NBER Working Papers 1427, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Carl Hamilton, 1981. "A new approach to estimation of the effects of non-tariff barriers to trade: An application to the Swedish textile and clothing industry," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 117(2), pages 298-325, June.
    10. Julien Ancel & Théo Mandonnet & Michel de Lara, 2022. "French Optimal and Robust Trade Policies Under Carbon Footprint Reduction Constraint and Uncertainties," Working Papers hal-03721999, HAL.
    11. Joshua Aizenman, 1989. "Inward Versus Outward Growth Orientation in the Presence of Country Risk," NBER Working Papers 2868, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Joachim Zietz & Alberto Valdés, 1993. "The Growth of Agricultural Protection," NBER Chapters, in: Trade and Protectionism, pages 115-146, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Martin C. McGuire, 2010. "Economic Analysis and International Security," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 6(2), pages 313-346, March.
    14. van Bergeijk, P.A.G., 2015. "The heterogeneity of world trade collapses," ISS Working Papers - General Series 606, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    15. Makoto Okamura & Koichi Futagami, 1998. "A national-security argument for trade protection," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 39-52, February.
    16. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2009. "Economic Diplomacy and the Geography of International Trade," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13518.
    17. Yongzheng Yang, 2000. "Food Embargoes against China: Their Likelihood and Potential Consequences," Asia Pacific Economic Papers 304, Australia-Japan Research Centre, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    18. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2010. "On the Brink of Deglobalization," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14122.
    19. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2019. "Deglobalization 2.0," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18560.
    20. Martin C. McGuire, 2000. "Provision for Adversity," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 44(6), pages 730-752, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/1711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.