IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tsa/wpaper/0204mss.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quality Management in a Three-Level Supply Chain: The Role of Methods and Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang Wan

    (Marquette University)

  • Kefeng Xu

    (UTSA)

  • Yang Dong
  • Philip T. Evers

Abstract

While various techniques for improving product quality have been proposed, the supply chain network is often taken for granted. This paper considers quality control within a three-level supply chain and provides interesting findings that differ from the existing literature. Results suggest a curvilinear relationship between quality improvement efforts in the supply chain and brand owner profit: maximum efforts by the supplier and manufacturer do not guarantee optimal profit for the brand owner. Furthermore, two quality control methods - appraisal and certification - are examined. The quality control methods are found to affect both finished product quality and brand owner profit, but their impacts are moderated by the external failure cost of finished products. Results also suggest that no one particular quality control method dominates in terms of improving finished product quality or raising firm profitability. The optimal quality control method depends on the external product failure cost and other contextual factors in the supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang Wan & Kefeng Xu & Yang Dong & Philip T. Evers, 2014. "Quality Management in a Three-Level Supply Chain: The Role of Methods and Costs," Working Papers 0204mss, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
  • Handle: RePEc:tsa:wpaper:0204mss
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://interim.business.utsa.edu/wps/mss/200MSS-068-2011.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick W. Schmitz, 2005. "Allocating Control in Agency Problems with Limited Liability and Sequential Hidden Actions," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 36(2), pages 318-336, Summer.
    2. Saif Benjaafar & Ehsan Elahi & Karen L. Donohue, 2007. "Outsourcing via Service Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 241-259, February.
    3. Gérard P. Cachon & Fuqiang Zhang, 2007. "Obtaining Fast Service in a Queueing System via Performance-Based Allocation of Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 408-420, March.
    4. Kaijie Zhu & Rachel Q. Zhang & Fugee Tsung, 2007. "Pushing Quality Improvement Along Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 421-436, March.
    5. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 2005. "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 30-44, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoo, Seung Ho & Cheong, Taesu, 2018. "Quality improvement incentive strategies in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 331-342.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Dong & Kefeng Xu & Sining Song, 2014. "Contracting for Quality in a Multiple-Level Global Supply Chain," Working Papers 0205mss, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    2. Xinghong Qin & Qiang Su & Samuel H. Huang & Uco Jillert Wiersma & Ming Liu, 2019. "Service quality coordination contracts for online shopping service supply chain with competing service providers: integrating fairness and individual rationality," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 269-296, March.
    3. Fan, Jianchang & Ni, Debing & Fang, Xiang, 2020. "Liability cost sharing, product quality choice, and coordination in two-echelon supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 514-537.
    4. Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu & Jan A. Van Mieghem & R. Canan Savaskan, 2009. "Incentives for Quality Through Endogenous Routing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 254-273, July.
    5. El Ouardighi, Fouad, 2014. "Supply quality management with optimal wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts: A two-stage game approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 260-268.
    6. Ibtissem Ernez-Gahbiche & Khaled Hadjyoussef & Abdelwaheb Dogui & Zied Jemai, 2019. "Decentralized versus cooperative performances in a Nash game between a customer and two suppliers," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 279-307, June.
    7. Cuihong Li, 2013. "Sourcing for Supplier Effort and Competition: Design of the Supply Base and Pricing Mechanism," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1389-1406, June.
    8. Yang Dong & Kefeng Xu & Yi Xu & Xiang Wan, 2013. "Quality Assurance Contracts in a Multi-Level Supply Chain," Working Papers 0206mss, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    9. Xu, Hongyan & Liu, Xiaomin & Huang, He, 2023. "Information sharing and order allocation rule in dual-sourcing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Chen, Jing & Wei, Hang & Xu, Shujun & Zheng, Chaonan, 2023. "The value of product recall insurance in a price competition with financially constrained suppliers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1161-1176.
    11. Hongmin Li & Hao Zhang & Charles H. Fine, 2013. "Dynamic Business Share Allocation in a Supply Chain with Competing Suppliers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 280-297, April.
    12. Ravi Bapna & Anitesh Barua & Deepa Mani & Amit Mehra, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Cooperation, Coordination, and Governance in Multisourcing: An Agenda for Analytical and Empirical Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 785-795, December.
    13. Avinadav, Tal & Chernonog, Tatyana & Fruchter, Gila E. & Prasad, Ashutosh, 2020. "Contract design when quality is co-created in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 908-918.
    14. Elahi, Ehsan, 2013. "Outsourcing through competition: What is the best competition parameter?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 370-382.
    15. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Lai, Hsing-Hua, 2017. "Capacity allocation with differentiated product demands under dual sourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 757-769.
    16. Zhai, Yue & Hua, Guowei & Cheng, Meng & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Production lead-time hedging and order allocation in an MTO supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 887-905.
    17. Chen, Jingxian & Liang, Liang & Yang, Feng, 2015. "Cooperative quality investment in outsourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 174-191.
    18. Liberopoulos, George & Deligiannis, Michalis, 2022. "Optimal supplier inventory control policies when buyer purchase incidence is driven by past service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 917-936.
    19. Deligiannis, Michalis & Liberopoulos, George & Benioudakis, Myron, 2023. "Dynamic supplier competition and cooperation for buyer loyalty on service," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    20. Iida, Tetsuo, 2012. "Coordination of cooperative cost-reduction efforts in a supply chain partnership," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 180-190.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quality management; Simulation; Three-level supply chains.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation
    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsa:wpaper:0204mss. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wendy Frost (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbutsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.