IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/trn/utwpas/1213.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Iteration, Tâtonnement, Computation and Economic Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • K. Vela Velupillai

Abstract

An attempt is made, in this paper, to extract a mathematical methodology, underpinned by numerical meaning, from a study of Richard Goodwin’s classic contributions from 1943 to 1967 -- and beyond. The key conceptual notions I use are tâtonnement, computation, approximations, the geometry of dynamics, simulations and iteration.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Vela Velupillai, 2012. "Iteration, Tâtonnement, Computation and Economic Dynamics," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1213, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.
    • Handle: RePEc:trn:utwpas:1213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.assru.economia.unitn.it/files/DP_2_2012_II.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Vela Velupillai & Stefano Zambelli, 2010. "Computation in Economics," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1001, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.
    2. Pasinetti,Luigi L., 2007. "Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521872270, January.
    3. Vela Velupillai, K., 2002. "Effectivity and constructivity in economic theory," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 307-325, November.
    4. repec:bla:scandj:v:80:y:1978:i:2:p:190-98 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Samuelson, Paul A, 1972. "Maximum Principles in Analytical Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(3), pages 249-262, June.
    6. R. M. Goodwin, 1982. "Essays in Economic Dynamics," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-05504-3, October.
    7. Jaffe, William, 1980. "Walras's Economics As Others See It," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 18(2), pages 528-549, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. Vela Velupillai, 2011. "Postkeynesian Precepts for Nonlinear, Endogenous, Nonstochastic, Business Cycle Theories," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1107, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.
    2. Piero Ferri, 2011. "Macroeconomics of Growth Cycles and Financial Instability," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14260.
    3. Nocetti, Diego C., 2013. "The LeChatelier principle for changes in risk," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 460-466.
    4. Garbellini, Nadia, 2020. "Measurement without theory, and theory without measurement: What's wrong with Piketty's capital in the XXI century?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 50-62.
    5. Heinz D. Kurz & Neri Salvadori, 2011. "In Favor of Rigor and Relevance: A Reply to Mark Blaug," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 607-616, Fall.
    6. Vincent Carret, 2021. "Rupture and continuity in the original divide between micro-dynamics and macro-dynamics," Working Papers halshs-03242180, HAL.
    7. repec:voc:wpaper:tech82012 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Pasinetti, Luigi L., 2022. "Structural dynamics versus a macroeconomic approach – A final statement?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 559-561.
    9. Martin Flodén, 2006. "Labour Supply and Saving Under Uncertainty," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 116(513), pages 721-737, July.
    10. Ha-Joon Chang & Antonio Andreoni, 2021. "Bringing Production Back into Development: An introduction," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(2), pages 165-178, April.
    11. Venkatasubramanian, Venkat & Luo, Yu & Sethuraman, Jay, 2015. "How much inequality in income is fair? A microeconomic game theoretic perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 435(C), pages 120-138.
    12. Marlene Kim, 2018. "URPE at Fifty: Reflections on a Half Century of Activism, Community, Debate (and a Few Crazy Moments)," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 50(3), pages 468-486, September.
    13. Kazuhiro Kurose, 2022. "A two-class economy from the multi-sectoral perspective: the controversy between Pasinetti and Meade–Hahn–Samuelson–Modigliani revisited," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 239-270, April.
    14. Pier Luigi Porta, 2013. "What remains of Sraffa's economics," Working Papers 242, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised May 2013.
    15. Massimo Cingolani, 2015. "Sylos Labini su Marx: implicazioni per la politica economica (Sylos Labini on Marx: economic policy implications)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 68(269), pages 81-147.
    16. Kislaya Prasad, 2004. "Constructive and Classical Models for Results in Economics and Game Theory," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2‐3), pages 141-154, May.
    17. Venkat Venkatasubramanian & Yu Luo, 2018. "How much income inequality is fair? Nash bargaining solution and its connection to entropy," Papers 1806.05262, arXiv.org.
    18. Adrian Pabst & Roberto Scazzieri, 2012. "The political economy of civil society," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 337-356, December.
    19. Guglielmo Chiodi, 2012. "On Richard Goodwin’s Elementary Economics from the Higher Standpoint," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1219, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.
    20. Matthias Aistleitner & Jakob Kapeller & Stefan Steinerberger, 2018. "Citation Patterns in Economics and Beyond," Working Papers Series 85, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    21. Giancarlo Gandolfo, 2015. "The Tobin tax in a continuous-time non-linear dynamic model of the exchange rate," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 39(6), pages 1629-1643.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:trn:utwpas:1213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: assru.tm@gmail.com (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/detreit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.