IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20240029.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Seeking or ignoring ethical certifications in consumer choice

Author

Listed:
  • Dianna R. Amasino

    (Tilburg University and University of Amsterdam)

  • Suzanne Oosterwijk

    (University of Amsterdam)

  • Nicolette J. Sullivan

    (The London School of Economics and Political Science)

  • Joël van der Weele

    (University of Amsterdam)

Abstract

Consumers often encounter, and claim to care about, ethical information concerning the products they purchase. Across three studies, we investigate how the accessibility of this information impacts choice. When consumers must seek out product attribute information, the impact of ethical certifications (Fairtrade and Organic) is diminished relative to other attributes. Both positive and negative framing of certifications increase their impact on choice relative to neutral frames, with negative frames having the strongest effect. However, in contrast to theories of information demand that would predict more willful ignorance of negatively framed content, negative framing has the same impact regardless of information accessibility. Together, our findings suggest that having to seek ethical certification information leads to a small reduction in the use of certifications to guide choice, but that affective framing has a larger impact on the weight placed on certifications in consumer choices regardless of the accessibility of information.

Suggested Citation

  • Dianna R. Amasino & Suzanne Oosterwijk & Nicolette J. Sullivan & Joël van der Weele, 2024. "Seeking or ignoring ethical certifications in consumer choice," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-029/I, Tinbergen Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20240029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/24029.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer-choice; information-avoidance; information-seeking; willful ignorance; sustainability; certifications;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D87 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Neuroeconomics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20240029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.