IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tcu/wpaper/201007.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Interest behind the 1st Nationalist Movement: 1783

Author

Listed:
  • John Lovett

    (Department of Economics, Texas Christian University)

Abstract

There is a strong tradition of examining the economic motivation behind the drafting and ratification of the U.S. Constitution. The constitutional movement, however, was not the first attempt at a stronger central government. This paper investigates the economic and geographic interests behind the “first nationalist movement”, a 1783 drive to strengthen the Articles of Confederation that very nearly succeeded. A voting index, based on stated nationalist agenda, is constructed for delegates to the Congress. This index is regressed on state level data individual characteristics of each delegate. The results indicate that, despite this being period of relative unity (peace but not yet a peace treaty), much of nationalist support is explained by economic and geographic interests. Nationalist tend to be from populous states with few disputed land claims and little foreign trade. There is weaker evidence that state debt and being near the frontier made delegates more nationalist.

Suggested Citation

  • John Lovett, 2010. "Economic Interest behind the 1st Nationalist Movement: 1783," Working Papers 201006, Texas Christian University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:tcu:wpaper:201007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.tcu.edu/RePEc/tcu/wpaper/wp10-06.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2010
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McGuire, Robert A. & Ohsfeldt, Robert L., 1984. "Economic Interests and the American Constitution: A Quantitative Rehabilitation of Charles A. Beard," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 509-519, June.
    2. Anonymous, 1985. "Selected Writings and Speeches of Alexander Hamilton. Edited by Morton J. Frisch. (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1985. Pp. xiv + 524. $25.95, cloth; $14.9," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 79(4), pages 1273-1273, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:2:y:2002:i:1:p:1-15 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kibritçioğlu, Aykut, 1996. "Friedrich List'in Bebek Endüstriler Tezi [Friedrich List's Infant Industry Argument]," MPRA Paper 2549, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Paul D. Carlsen & Jac C. Heckelman, 2016. "State bloc versus individual delegate voting at the constitutional convention: Did it make a difference?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 82(3), pages 781-800, January.
    4. Aykut Kibritçioglu, 2002. "On the Smithian origins of "new" trade and growth theories," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 2(1), pages 1-15.
    5. Keith Dougherty & Jac Heckelman, 2008. "Voting on slavery at the Constitutional Convention," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 293-313, September.
    6. George Crowley, 2012. "Spatial dependence in constitutional constraints: the case of US states," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 134-165, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    US history; nationalist movement; constitution; articles of confederation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • N41 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - U.S.; Canada: Pre-1913
    • H10 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tcu:wpaper:201007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John Harvey (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/detcuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.