IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/2549.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Friedrich List'in Bebek Endüstriler Tezi
[Friedrich List's Infant Industry Argument]

Author

Listed:
  • Kibritçioğlu, Aykut

Abstract

After presenting a broad review of Friedrich List's infant industry argument (Erziehungszollargument) departing from collected works of List, this study aims to compare his ideas with that of Hamilton, Say, Mill, Bastable and Kemp. It underlines the restricted theoretical validity of the argument in modern terms of economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Kibritçioğlu, Aykut, 1996. "Friedrich List'in Bebek Endüstriler Tezi [Friedrich List's Infant Industry Argument]," MPRA Paper 2549, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:2549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2549/1/MPRA_paper_2549.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krueger, Anne O & Tuncer, Baran, 1994. "An Empirical Test of the Infant Industry Argument: Reply," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(4), pages 1096-1096, September.
    2. Lucas, Robert E B, 1984. "An Empirical Test of the Infant Industry Argument: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(5), pages 1110-1111, December.
    3. Krueger, Anne O & Tuncer, Baran, 1982. "An Empirical Test of the Infant Industry Argument," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(5), pages 1142-1152, December.
    4. Baldwin, Robert E, 1969. "The Case against Infant-Industry Tariff Protection," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 77(3), pages 295-305, May/June.
    5. Levinsohn, James, 1993. "Testing the imports-as-market-discipline hypothesis," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1-2), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Anonymous, 1985. "Selected Writings and Speeches of Alexander Hamilton. Edited by Morton J. Frisch. (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1985. Pp. xiv + 524. $25.95, cloth; $14.9," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 79(4), pages 1273-1273, December.
    7. S. Clemhout & H. Y. Wan, 1970. "Learning-by-Doing and Infant Industry Protection," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 37(1), pages 33-56.
    8. Bardhan, Pranab K, 1971. "On Optimum Subsidy to a Learning Industry: An Aspect of the Theory of Infant-Industry Protection," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 12(1), pages 54-70, February.
    9. Jacobsson, Staffan, 1993. "The length of the infant industry period: Evidence from the engineering industry in South Korea," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 407-419, March.
    10. repec:fth:michin:272 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Takashi Negishi, 1968. "Protection of the Infant Industry and Dynamic Internal Economies," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 44(1), pages 56-67, March.
    12. Succar, Patricia, 1987. "The Need for Industrial Policy in LDC's--A Re-statement of the Infant Industry Argument," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 28(2), pages 521-534, June.
    13. Haddad, L., 1987. "List Revisited: Dynamic Consideration Of Trade And Protection," Working Papers 100, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    14. Kirim, Arman, 1990. "Technology and exports: The case of the Turkish manufacturing industries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 18(10), pages 1351-1362, October.
    15. Bell, Martin & Ross-Larson, Bruce & Westphal, Larry E., 1984. "Assessing the performance of infant industries," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1-2), pages 101-128.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harrison, Ann & Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés, 2010. "Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Dani Rodrik & Mark Rosenzweig (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 4039-4214, Elsevier.
    2. Omid Zamani & Craig Chibanda & Janine Pelikan, 2023. "Unraveling the effects of import bans on domestic poultry production: a case study of Senegal," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Harrison, Ann E. & Rodriguez-Clare, Andres, 2009. "Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy," MPRA Paper 15561, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Melitz, Marc J., 2005. "When and how should infant industries be protected?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 177-196, May.
    5. Unterschultz, James R. & Lerohl, Mel L. & Peng, Yanning & Gurung, Rajendra Kumar, 1998. "A Nutraceutical Industry: Policy Implications for Future Directions," Project Report Series 24051, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    6. Wittern, Jonas & Luckmann, Jonas & Grethe, Harald, 2023. "Cashew processing in Ghana – A case for infant industry support?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Kaneda, Mitsuhiro, 2003. "Policy designs in a dynamic model of infant industry protection," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 91-115, October.
    8. To, T.C., 1993. "Infant Industry Protection with Learning-by-Doing," Discussion Paper 1993-26, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    9. Facundo Albornoz & Paolo Vanin, 2007. "Trade Policy and Industrial Structure," Discussion Papers 05-12, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
    10. Lee, Jaymin, 1997. "The maturation and growth of infant industries: The case of Korea," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(8), pages 1271-1281, August.
    11. Goh, Ai-Ting, 2000. "Opportunity cost, trade policies and the efficiency of firms," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 363-383, August.
    12. Harris, Richard & Keay, Ian & Lewis, Frank, 2015. "Protecting infant industries: Canadian manufacturing and the national policy, 1870–1913," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 15-31.
    13. Irwin, Douglas A., 2000. "Did Late-Nineteenth-Century U.S. Tariffs Promote Infant Industries? Evidence from the Tinplate Industry," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 60(2), pages 335-360, June.
    14. Edward Tower, 1986. "Industrial Policy In Less Developed Countries," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 4(1), pages 23-35, January.
    15. Wu, Yiyun & Zhu, Xiwei & Groenewold, Nicolaas, 2019. "The determinants and effectiveness of industrial policy in china: A study based on Five-Year Plans," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 225-242.
    16. Dosi, Giovanni & Grazzi, Marco & Mathew, Nanditha, 2017. "The cost-quantity relations and the diverse patterns of “learning by doing”: Evidence from India," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1873-1886.
    17. Vosgerau, Hans-Jürgen, 1993. "Trade policy and competition policy in Europe: Complementarities and contradictions," Discussion Papers, Series II 198, University of Konstanz, Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 178 "Internationalization of the Economy".
    18. Hoff, Karla, 1997. "Bayesian learning in an infant industry model," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3-4), pages 409-436, November.
    19. Wim Naudé, 2010. "Industrial Policy: Old and New Issues," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2010-106, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. Nisar Ahmad, 2013. "Competitive Strength of Nations: Doing Business in a Global Market," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 1(1), pages 41-50.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Friedrich List; infant industry argument; Hamilton; Mill; Bastable; Kemp; externalities; economies of scale;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:2549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.