IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tcd/tcduee/tep0325.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Confident, but Undervalued: Evidence from the Irish Economic Association Conference

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret Samahita

    (Department of Economics and Geary Institute for Public Policy, University College Dublin)

  • Martina Zanella

    (Department of Economics, Trinity College Dublin)

Abstract

This paper examines the gender influence gap in an academic setting, focusing on the Irish Economic Association (IEA) Conference review process. Using data from 2017 to 2023, we analyze whether organizers follow the recommendations of male and female reviewers equally and whether any difference can be attributed to a gender gap in the confidence of reviewers. Our findings reveal that organizers' decisions more closely align with male reviewers', particularly when the reviewer's confidence is high and when they have experience in the profession. The influence gap cannot be explained by female reviewers being less confident than males, which is the traditional explanation in the literature. Contrary to expectations, female reviewers report higher confidence than males. We explore potential mechanisms and find suggestive evidence that female reviewers strategically overstate their confidence in anticipation of discriminatory treatment by organizers.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret Samahita & Martina Zanella, 2025. "Confident, but Undervalued: Evidence from the Irish Economic Association Conference," Trinity Economics Papers tep0325, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:tcd:tcduee:tep0325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.tcd.ie/Economics/TEP/2025/TEP0325.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    discrimination; confidence; economics; strategic response;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tcd:tcduee:tep0325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colette Angelov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/detcdie.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.