IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/stc/stcp3f/2001173f.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Entraves a l'adoption des technologies de pointe pour les fabricants canadiens

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Zhengxi
  • Baldwin, John R.

Abstract

Nous examinons dans le present document, a l'aide de donnees d'enquete, les problemes auxquels font face les entreprises du secteur canadien de la fabrication lorsqu'elles decident d'adopter des technologies de pointe. Les donnees montrent que l'utilisation des technologies de pointe est relativement importante (leurs utilisateurs representant plus de 80 % de toutes les livraisons), mais que leur emploi n'est pas repandu dans les entreprises (leurs utilisateurs ne constituant qu'environ le tiers de tous les etablissements). Cette situation vient notamment du fait que les technologies de pointe offrent une vaste gamme d'avantages, mais que les entreprises sont egalement confrontees a une serie d'entraves, des problemes qui les empechent d'adopter ces technologies. Ces entraves s'inscrivent a l'interieur de cinq groupes : les problemes lies aux couts, les problemes lies au cadre institutionnel, les problemes en matiere de main-d'oeuvre, les problemes lies a la structure organisationnelle et les problemes en matiere d'information. Meme si l'on pourrait s'attendre a ce que les entraves soient plus grandes pour les non-utilisateurs que pour les utilisateurs des technologies de pointe, c'est le contraire qui se produit. Nous postulons qu'il en est ainsi parce que l'innovation suppose un processus d'apprentissage. Les innovateurs et les utilisateurs des technologies de pointe font face a des problemes qu'ils doivent regler et les entreprises plus innovatrices ont des plus gros problemes. Nous verifions ce postulat en examinant les facteurs lies au fait qu'une entreprise signale ou ne signale pas qu'elle a fait face a des entraves. Notre analyse multidimensionnelle revele que les utilisateurs des technologies de pointe et que les entreprises qui innovent signalent plus souvent des entraves que les non-utilisateurs de ces technologies et que les entreprises qui n'innovent pas. Nous concluons qu'il ne faudrait pas interpreter l'information sur les entraves dans les rapports des enquetes sur la technologie et d'autres enquetes connexes (sur l'innovation) comme des obstacles infranchissables qui empechent les entreprises d'adopter des technologies. Ces enquetes indiquent plutot les domaines ou les entreprises qui connaissent le succes font face a des problemes et les reglent.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Zhengxi & Baldwin, John R., 2001. "Entraves a l'adoption des technologies de pointe pour les fabricants canadiens," Direction des études analytiques : documents de recherche 2001173f, Statistics Canada, Direction des études analytiques.
    • Handle: RePEc:stc:stcp3f:2001173f
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/fr/catalogue/11F0019M2001173
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fagerberg, Jan, 1988. "International Competitiveness," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 98(391), pages 355-374, June.
    2. Gellatly, Guy, 2000. "Differences de profils entre innovateurs et non-innovateurs : les petits etablissements du secteur des services aux entreprises," Direction des études analytiques : documents de recherche 2000143f, Statistics Canada, Direction des études analytiques.
    3. Fagerberg, Jan, 1996. "Technology and Competitiveness," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 39-51, Autumn.
    4. Baldwin, John R. & Johnson, Joanne, 1996. "Business strategies in more- and less-innovative firms in Canada," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 785-804, August.
    5. Baldwin, John R. & Diverty, Brent, 1995. "Utilisation des technologies de pointe dans les etablissements de fabrication," Direction des études analytiques : documents de recherche 1995085f, Statistics Canada, Direction des études analytiques.
    6. Johnson, Joanne & Baldwin, John R., 1995. "Business Strategies in Innovative and Non-innovative Firms in Canada," Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 1995073e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    7. Baldwin, John R., 1995. "Innovation: The Key to Success in Small Firms," Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 1995076e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    8. Sabourin, David & Baldwin, John R. & Diverty, Brent, 1995. "Utilisation des technologies et transformation industrielle : perspectives empiriques," Direction des études analytiques : documents de recherche 1995075f, Statistics Canada, Direction des études analytiques.
    9. Baldwin, John R. & Yates, Janice, 1999. "Innovation, formation et reussite," Direction des études analytiques : documents de recherche 1999137f, Statistics Canada, Direction des études analytiques.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baldwin, John & Lin, Zhengxi, 2002. "Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Sabourin, David & Baldwin, John R., 2001. "Impact de l'adoption des technologies de l'information et des communications de pointe sur la performance des entreprises du secteur de la fabrication au Canada," Direction des études analytiques : documents de recherche 2001174f, Statistics Canada, Direction des études analytiques.
    3. Baldwin, John R. & Yates, Janice, 1999. "Innovation, Training and Success," Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 1999137e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    4. Baldwin, John R. Gu, Wulong, 2004. "Innovation, survie et rendement des établissements canadiens de fabrication," Série de documents de recherche sur l'analyse économique (AE) 2004022f, Statistics Canada, Direction des études analytiques.
    5. Sabourin, David & Baldwin, John R., 2001. "Impact of the Adoption of Advanced Information and Communication Technologies on Firm Performance in the Canadian Manufacturing Sector," Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 2001174e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    6. Baldwin, John R. Sabourin, David, 2004. "The Effect of Changing Technology Use on Plant Performance in the Canadian Manufacturing Sector," Economic Analysis (EA) Research Paper Series 2004020e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    7. Ray Barrell & Dirk Willem te Velde, 2002. "European Integration and Manufactures Import Demand: An Empirical Investigation of Ten European Countries," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 3(3), pages 263-293, August.
    8. Keil, Sascha, 2024. "Assessing the role of non-price factors: Shedding new light on the European competitiveness puzzle," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Rama, Ed & Sabourin, David & Baldwin, John R., 1999. "Croissance de l'utilisation des technologies de pointe dans le secteur canadien de la fabrication durant les annees 90," Direction des études analytiques : documents de recherche 1999105f, Statistics Canada, Direction des études analytiques.
    10. Johnson, Joanne & Baldwin, John R., 1998. "Differences dans les strategies et le rendement de divers types d'innovateurs," Direction des études analytiques : documents de recherche 1997102f, Statistics Canada, Direction des études analytiques.
    11. Horen Voskeritsian & Michail Veliziotis & Panos Kapotas & Andreas Kornelakis, 2017. "Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Social Partners and Reforms in the Wage- Setting System in Greece under Austerity'," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 114, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    12. Oleg Sidorkin & Martin Srholec, 2022. "Do Direct Subsidies Stimulate New R&D Outputs in Firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2203-2229, September.
    13. Johnson, Joanne & Baldwin, John R., 1998. "Differences in Strategies and Performances of Different Types of Innovators," Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 1997102e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    14. John FitzGerald & Mary Keeney & Sue Scott, 2009. "Assessing vulnerability of selected sectors under environmental tax reform: the issue of pricing power," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(3), pages 413-433.
    15. Nilsson, Desirée, 2007. "Changing Export Structure According to Income Elasticity - Kaldor revisited," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 92, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    16. Baldwin, John R. Gellatly, Guy, 2006. "Innovation Capabilities: The Knowledge Capital Behind the Survival and Growth of Firms," The Canadian Economy in Transition 2006013e, Statistics Canada, Economic Analysis Division.
    17. Vesna Stavrevska, 2011. "The efficiency wages perspective to wage rigidity in the open economy: a survey," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 273-299, June.
    18. repec:phd:pjdevt:pjd_2004_vol__xxxi_no__1-a is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Carlin, Wendy & Glyn, Andrew & Van Reenen, John, 2001. "Export Market Performance of OECD Countries: An Empirical Examination of the Role of Cost Competitiveness," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 111(468), pages 128-162, January.
    20. Fagerberg, Jan & Srholec, Martin & Verspagen, Bart, 2010. "Innovation and Economic Development," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 833-872, Elsevier.
    21. Yap, Josef T., 2004. "A Note on the Competitiveness Debate," Discussion Papers DP 2004-39, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:stc:stcp3f:2001173f. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Brown (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.