IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/spa/wpaper/2019wpecon47.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Day trading for a living? Fernando

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Chague
  • Rodrigo De-Losso, Bruno Giovannetti

Abstract

We show that it is virtually impossible for an individual to day trade for a living, contrary to what course providers claim. We observe all individuals who began to day trade between 2013 and 2015 in the Brazilian equity futures market, the third in terms of volume in the world, and persisted for at least 300 days: 97% of them lost money, only 0.4% earned more than a bank teller (US$54 per day), and the top individual earned only US$310 per day with great risk (a standard deviation of US$2,560). Additionally, we find no evidence of learning by day trading.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Chague & Rodrigo De-Losso, Bruno Giovannetti, 2019. "Day trading for a living? Fernando," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2019_47, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    • Handle: RePEc:spa:wpaper:2019wpecon47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.repec.eae.fea.usp.br/documentos/Chague_Losso_Giovannetti_47WP.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuo, Wei-Yu & Lin, Tse-Chun, 2013. "Overconfident individual day traders: Evidence from the Taiwan futures market," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3548-3561.
    2. Barber, Brad M. & Lee, Yi-Tsung & Liu, Yu-Jane & Odean, Terrance, 2014. "The cross-section of speculator skill: Evidence from day trading," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 1-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chague, Fernando & De-Losso, Rodrigo & Giovannetti, Bruno Cara, 2020. "Day trading for a living?," Textos para discussão 525, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    2. Liew, Ping-Xin & Lim, Kian-Ping & Goh, Kim-Leng, 2020. "Does proprietary day trading provide liquidity at a cost to investors?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Chuang, Yi-Wei & Tsai, Wei-Che & Weng, Pei-Shih, 2020. "The impact of weather on order submissions and trading performance," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Fung, Scott & Tsai, Shih-Chuan, 2021. "The price discovery role of day traders in futures market: Evidence from different types of day traders," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 53-77.
    5. Matthew C. Chang & Chih‐Ling Tsai & Rebecca Chung‐Fern Wu & Ning Zhu, 2018. "Market uncertainty and market orders in futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(8), pages 865-880, August.
    6. Guiso, Luigi & Sodini, Paolo, 2013. "Household Finance: An Emerging Field," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1397-1532, Elsevier.
    7. Forman, John & Horton, Joanne, 2019. "Overconfidence, position size, and the link to performance," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 291-309.
    8. Fernando Chague & Rodrigo De Losso, Bruno Giovannetti, 2017. "The Price Tag Illusion," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2017_31, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    9. Barrot, Jean-Noel & Kaniel, Ron & Sraer, David, 2016. "Are retail traders compensated for providing liquidity?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 146-168.
    10. Hayley, Simon & Marsh, Ian W., 2016. "What do retail FX traders learn?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 16-38.
    11. Cox, Ruben & Kamolsareeratana, Atcha & Kouwenberg, Roy, 2020. "Compulsive gambling in the financial markets: Evidence from two investor surveys," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    12. Chiang, Mi-Hsiu & Chiu, Hsin-Yu & Kuo, Wei-Yu, 2021. "Predictive ability of similarity-based futures trading strategies," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Fenner, Richard G. & Han, Yufeng & Huang, Zhaodan, 2020. "Idiosyncratic volatility shocks, behavior bias, and cross-sectional stock returns," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 276-293.
    14. Hasso, Tim & Pelster, Matthias & Breitmayer, Bastian, 2019. "Who trades cryptocurrencies, how do they trade it, and how do they perform? Evidence from brokerage accounts," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 64-74.
    15. Eichfelder, Sebastian & Noack, Mona & Noth, Felix, 2022. "The impact of financial transaction taxes on stock markets: Short-run effects, long-run effects, and reallocation of trading activity," IWH Discussion Papers 12/2022, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    16. Utpal Bhattacharya & Wei-Yu Kuo & Tse-Chun Lin & Jing Zhao, 2019. "Do Superstitious Traders Lose Money?," HKUST IEMS Working Paper Series 2019-62, HKUST Institute for Emerging Market Studies, revised May 2019.
    17. Helen X. H. Bao & Steven Haotong Li, 2020. "Investor Overconfidence and Trading Activity in the Asia Pacific REIT Markets," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Pelster, Matthias, 2019. "Attracting attention from peers: Excitement in social trading," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 158-179.
    19. Bui, Dien Giau & Hasan, Iftekhar & Lin, Chih-Yung & Zhai, Rui-Xiang, 2022. "Income, trading, and performance: Evidence from retail investors," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 176-195.
    20. Hao, Ying & Chou, Robin K. & Ho, Keng-Yu & Weng, Pei-Shih, 2015. "The impact of foreign institutional traders on price efficiency: Evidence from the Taiwan futures market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 24-42.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    day trade; day trading for a living; retail investors; HFT; course providers; futures market;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C92 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Group Behavior
    • G02 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Behavioral Finance: Underlying Principles
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spa:wpaper:2019wpecon47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pedro Garcia Duarte (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuspbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.