IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sol/wpaper/2013-368066.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The proof is in the pudding: workers care about evidence-based diversity cues, not about value-based diversity cues

Author

Listed:
  • Valérie De Cock
  • Pinar Celik
  • Claudia Toma

Abstract

Many organizations are making use of various types of diversity cues to manage and retain diverse talents. To examine whether these cues indeed contribute to organizations’ diversity and inclusion (D&I) objectives or whether they can also endanger them, this paper examines how value-based and evidence-based diversity cues affect the company perceptions and work experiences of internal stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Valérie De Cock & Pinar Celik & Claudia Toma, 2024. "The proof is in the pudding: workers care about evidence-based diversity cues, not about value-based diversity cues," Working Papers CEB 24-002, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    • Handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/368066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/368066/3/wp24002.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wagner, Tillmann & Korschun, Daniel & Troebs, Cord-Christian, 2020. "Deconstructing corporate hypocrisy: A delineation of its behavioral, moral, and attributional facets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 385-394.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kenneth de Roeck & Nicolas Raineri & David Jones & Sabrina Scheidler, 2024. "Giving the benefit of the doubt: Investigating the insurance-like effect of CSR in mitigating negative employee reactions to psychological contract breach," Post-Print hal-04238140, HAL.
    2. Ioannis Ioannou & George Kassinis & Giorgos Papagiannakis, 2023. "The Impact of Perceived Greenwashing on Customer Satisfaction and the Contingent Role of Capability Reputation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(2), pages 333-347, June.
    3. Zengrui Xiao & Ying Wang & Dongjie Guo, 2022. "Will Greenwashing Result in Brand Avoidance? A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Basheer M. Al-Ghazali & M. Sadiq Sohail, 2021. "The Impact of Employees’ Perceptions of CSR on Career Satisfaction: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Juhua Xu & Eun-Kyoung Han, 2021. "How Temporal Order of Inconsistent CSR Information Affects Consumer Perceptions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Diletta Acuti & Marco Bellucci & Giacomo Manetti, 2024. "Preventive and Remedial Actions in Corporate Reporting Among “Addiction Industries”: Legitimacy, Effectiveness and Hypocrisy Perception," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 603-623, January.
    7. Saheli Goswami & Gargi Bhaduri, 2023. "Communicating Moral Responsibility: Stakeholder Capitalism, Types, and Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Dina Lucia Todaro & Riccardo Torelli, 2024. "From greenwashing to ESG‐washing: A focus on the circular economy field," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4034-4046, September.
    9. Lisa D. Lewin & Danielle E. Warren, 2024. "Calls to Action: The Dangers of Negative CSR Information and Stakeholder Punishments," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Yiming Wang & Yuhua Xie & Mingwei Liu & Yongxing Guo & Duojun He, 2024. "Silent Majority: How Employees’ Perceptions of Corporate Hypocrisy are Related to their Silence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(2), pages 315-334, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/368066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cebulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.