IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sol/wpaper/2013-233035.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fairness in Strategy: A Fair Process Evaluation of Strategy Schools

Author

Listed:
  • Koen Tackx
  • Ludo Van der Heyden
  • Paul Verdin

Abstract

The ‘strategy creation’ process – the process of formulating and implementing strategy – has been under critical study for decades for not delivering the desired results. The discussion on how a strategy process should be run has resulted in a number of ‘strategy schools’.Procedural justice theory is relevant to this discussion. It states that when people impacted by a process consider the process as ‘fair’ they demonstrate a higher level of trust and commitment, and performance increases. This article evaluates the extent to which traditional ‘strategy schools’ comply with the tenets of procedural justice theory and highlight the non-compliance with these tenets for each of these schools. We then propose a new strategy process model which has a greater fair process dimension than any of the more traditional ‘strategy schools’ and as such offers the potential to bring greater effectiveness to the strategy process.

Suggested Citation

  • Koen Tackx & Ludo Van der Heyden & Paul Verdin, 2016. "Fairness in Strategy: A Fair Process Evaluation of Strategy Schools," Working Papers CEB 16-031, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    • Handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/233035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/233035/3/wp16031.pdf
    File Function: Œuvre complète ou partie de l'œuvre
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larue Tone Hosmer, 1994. "Strategic planning as if ethics mattered," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S2), pages 17-34, June.
    2. W. Chan Kim & Renée A. Mauborgne, 1991. "Implementing global strategies: The role of procedural justice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(S1), pages 125-143, June.
    3. Henry Mintzberg, 1990. "The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), pages 171-195, March.
    4. P. Verdin & E. Cabocel & J. Celens & F. Faelli, 2011. "Making Change Work. What Managers, Executives and Staff Tell us that Really Matters," Review of Business and Economic Literature, Intersentia, vol. 56(2), pages 244-270, June.
    5. Henry Mintzberg & James A. Waters, 1985. "Of strategies, deliberate and emergent," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), pages 257-272, July.
    6. Peter J. Brews & Michelle R. Hunt, 1999. "Learning to plan and planning to learn: resolving the planning school/learning school debate," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(10), pages 889-913, October.
    7. Giovanni. Gavetti & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2004. "50th Anniversay Article: The Strategy Field from the Perspective of Management Science: Divergent Strands and Possible Integration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(10), pages 1309-1318, October.
    8. Pol Herrmann & Sucheta Nadkarni, 2014. "Managing strategic change: The duality of CEO personality," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(9), pages 1318-1342, September.
    9. Raymond Loi & Long Lam & Ka Chan, 2012. "Coping with Job Insecurity: The Role of Procedural Justice, Ethical Leadership and Power Distance Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(3), pages 361-372, July.
    10. Hongwei He & Weichun Zhu & Xiaoming Zheng, 2014. "Procedural Justice and Employee Engagement: Roles of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity Centrality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(4), pages 681-695, July.
    11. Ingemar Dierickx & Karel Cool, 1989. "Asset Stock Accumulation and the Sustainability of Competitive Advantage: Reply," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(12), pages 1514-1514, December.
    12. Koen Tackx, 2015. "Fair process perspectives on strategy creation," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/209055, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    13. Arnoldo C. Hax & Nicolas S. Majluf, 1988. "The Concept of Strategy and the Strategy Formation Process," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 99-109, June.
    14. Brian S. Anderson & Patrick M. Kreiser & Donald F. Kuratko & Jeffrey S. Hornsby & Yoshihiro Eshima, 2015. "Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(10), pages 1579-1596, October.
    15. Ingemar Dierickx & Karel Cool, 1989. "Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(12), pages 1504-1511, December.
    16. P. Verdin & E. Cabocel & J. Celens & F. Faelli, 2011. "Making Change Work. What Managers, Executives and Staff Tell us that Really Matters," Review of Business and Economic Literature, Intersentia, vol. 0(2), pages 244-270, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koen Tackx & Paul Verdin, 2014. "Can co-creation lead to better strategy? An exploratory research," Working Papers CEB 14-027, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Lu, Jinfeng & Dimov, Dimo, 2023. "A system dynamics modelling of entrepreneurship and growth within firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    3. Robert P. Garrett Jr. & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2015. "Internal Corporate Venture Operations Independence and Performance: A Knowledge–Based Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(4), pages 763-790, July.
    4. Kunc, Martin & O'Brien, Frances A., 2017. "Exploring the development of a methodology for scenario use: Combining scenario and resource mapping approaches," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 150-159.
    5. Adamides, Emmanuel D. & Voutsina, Marinie, 2006. "The double-helix model of manufacturing and marketing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 3-18, November.
    6. Jan-Erik Vahlne & Jan Johanson, 2017. "From internationalization to evolution: The Uppsala model at 40 years," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(9), pages 1087-1102, December.
    7. Baraldi, Enrico & Gressetvold, Espen & Harrison, Debbie, 2012. "Resource interaction in inter-organizational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 266-276.
    8. Stoelhorst, J. W. & van Raaij, Erik M., 2004. "On explaining performance differentials: Marketing and the managerial theory of the firm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 462-477, May.
    9. Nicolaï Foss & Nils Stieglitz, 2012. "Modern Resource-based Theory(ies)," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Sidney G. Winter & Gabriel Szulanski, 2001. "Replication as Strategy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(6), pages 730-743, December.
    11. J. W. Stoelhorst, 2023. "Value, rent, and profit: A stakeholder resource‐based theory," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1488-1513, June.
    12. Lim, Lewis K.S., 2013. "Mapping competitive prediction capability: Construct conceptualization and performance payoffs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1576-1586.
    13. Luis A. Rios, 2021. "On the origin of technological acquisition strategy: The interaction between organizational plasticity and environmental munificence," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(7), pages 1299-1325, July.
    14. Kamoche, Ken, 1997. "Managing human resources in Africa: Strategic, organizational and epistemological issues," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 537-558, October.
    15. Jürgen Strohhecker, 2016. "Factors influencing strategy implementation decisions: an evaluation of a balanced scorecard cockpit, intelligence, and knowledge," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 89-119, February.
    16. Steensen, Elmer Fly, 2014. "Five types of organizational strategy," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 266-281.
    17. Rachel Maritz & Marius Pretorius & Kato Plant, 2011. "Exploring the Interface Between Strategy-Making and Responsible Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 101-113, January.
    18. Sharon A. Alvarez & Jay B. Barney & Philip Anderson, 2013. "Forming and Exploiting Opportunities: The Implications of Discovery and Creation Processes for Entrepreneurial and Organizational Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 301-317, February.
    19. Titus Jr., Varkey K. & Covin, Jeffrey G. & Slevin, Dennis P., 2011. "Aligning strategic processes in pursuit of firm growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 446-453, May.
    20. Vilà, Joaquim & Canales, Juan I., 2001. "Sequence of thinking and acting in strategy making," IESE Research Papers D/436, IESE Business School.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Procedural Justice; Fair Process; Strategy Formulation; Strategy Implementation; Strategy Schools; Change Management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M30 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - General
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M37 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Advertising
    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/233035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cebulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.