IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/raiswp/0467.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Investigating the Applicability of Contingency Leadership Theory in the South African National Defence Forces: A Comparative Study of Combat and Support Divisions

Author

Listed:
  • Tseliso Isaiah Ramoeletsi

    (South African National Defence Forces, Pretoria, South Africa)

  • Harry Cameron

    (Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom)

Abstract

This study aimed to assist leaders in the South African National Defence Forces (SANDF) understand the contingency factors that influenced choice of leadership styles and help such leaders to select the appropriate leadership style(s) for enhancing leadership effectiveness. To do that, the study tested the applicability of the contingency leadership theory to the SANDF, identified the contingent leadership factors within the SANDF and recommended the appropriate leadership style. The study was based on a sample of randomly selected n=120 staff from one of SANDF’s unit, split equally between support and combat staff. Four instruments were administered, the Demographic instrument, the Task Work Instrument (WSI), the Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) instrument, the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) and the Least Preferred Co-worker (LPC) instrument. Descriptive statistics, correlation, T-tests and regression analyses were used to analyse the data. T-test results showed that there were statistically significant differences between staff in support and combat staff in terms of task structure, work engagement and leader-member exchange. In addition, these three leadership contingent factors were found to significantly influence the choice of leadership within SANDF’s combat division. Within the support division, task structure was an insignificant factor in determining the influence of leadership style but work engagement and leader-member exchange were significant contributors to the choice of leadership style in that division. Therefore, the differences in these contingent factors point to the applicability of the contingent theory to SANDF. While the dominant leadership style in the combat division was relationship-oriented, a combination of relationship-oriented and task-oriented leadership styles was dominant in the support division. Training and development were proposed as a way of enhancing the adaptability of leaders in the SANDF, thereby improving their mobility across the two diverse divisions. Finally, the size of the sample, relative to the target population, choice of contingent factors and reliance on quantitative methodology, all presented some limitations. Recommendations for future research has been given in light of these limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tseliso Isaiah Ramoeletsi & Harry Cameron, 2024. "Investigating the Applicability of Contingency Leadership Theory in the South African National Defence Forces: A Comparative Study of Combat and Support Divisions," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2022-2024 0467, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/0467.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Britta Matthes & Bernhard Christoph & Florian Janik & Michael Ruland, 2014. "Collecting information on job tasks—an instrument to measure tasks required at the workplace in a multi-topic survey [Die Erfassung von Job-Tasks in persönlichen Befragungen. Ein neues Instrument z," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 47(4), pages 273-297, December.
    2. Wilmar Schaufeli & Marisa Salanova & Vicente González-romá & Arnold Bakker, 2002. "The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 71-92, March.
    3. Popp, Marion & Hadwich, Karsten, 2018. "Examining the Effects of Employees' Behaviour by Transferring a Leadership Contingency Theory to the Service Context," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 2(3), pages 44-62.
    4. Lindley, Joanne, 2012. "The gender dimension of technical change and the role of task inputs," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 516-526.
    5. Matthes, Britta & Christoph, Bernhard & Janik, Florian & Ruland, Michael, 2014. "Collecting information on job tasks - an instrument to measure tasks required at the workplace in a multi-topic survey," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 47(4), pages 273-297.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dengler, Katharina & Matthes, Britta & Paulus, Wiebke, 2014. "Occupational Tasks in the German Labour Market : an alternative measurement on the basis of an expert database," FDZ Methodenreport 201412_en, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    2. Jasmine Mondolo, 2022. "The composite link between technological change and employment: A survey of the literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 1027-1068, September.
    3. repec:iab:iabfme:201412(de is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Dengler, Katharina & Matthes, Britta & Paulus, Wiebke, 2014. "Berufliche Tasks auf dem deutschen Arbeitsmarkt : eine alternative Messung auf Basis einer Expertendatenbank (Occupational Tasks in the German Labour Market : an alternative measurement on the basis o," FDZ Methodenreport 201412_de, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    5. repec:iab:iabfme:201412(en is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Beckert, Bernd & Buschak, Daniela & Graf, Birgit & Hägele, Martin & Jäger, Angela & Moll, Cornelius & Schmoch, Ulrich & Wydra, Sven, 2016. "Automatisierung und Robotik-Systeme," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 11-2016, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    7. Heß, Pascal & Janssen, Simon & Leber, Ute, 2019. "Digitalisierung und berufliche Weiterbildung: Beschäftigte, deren Tätigkeiten durch Technologien ersetzbar sind, bilden sich seltener weiter (Digitization and on-the-job training: employees who perfor," IAB-Kurzbericht 201916, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    8. Maximilian Trommer & Hildegard Schaeper & Gregor Fabian, 2021. "KWReq—a new instrument for measuring knowledge work requirements of higher education graduates," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 55(1), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Nancy Kracke & Margarida Rodrigues, 2020. "A Task-Based Indicator for Labour Market Mismatch," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 399-421, June.
    10. Francis Green & Golo Henseke, 2016. "The changing graduate labour market: analysis using a new indicator of graduate jobs," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-25, December.
    11. Stephan Bischof, 2024. "Test-based measurement of skill mismatch: a validation of five different measurement approaches using the NEPS," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 58(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Martina Bisello & Eleonora Peruffo & Enrique Fernandez-Macias & Riccardo Rinaldi, 2019. "How computerisation is transforming jobs: Evidence from the European Working Conditions Survey," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2019-02, Joint Research Centre.
    13. Arntz, Melanie & Dengler, Katharina & Dorau, Ralf & Gregory, Terry & Hartwig, Matthias & Helmrich, Robert & Lehmer, Florian & Matthes, Britta & Tisch, Anita & Wischniewski, Sascha & Zierahn, Ulrich, 2020. "Digitalisierung und Wandel der Beschäftigung (DIWABE): Eine Datengrundlage für die interdisziplinäre Sozialpolitikforschung," ZEW Dokumentationen 20-02, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    14. Zeyer-Gliozzo, Birgit, 2020. "Returns to formal, non-formal and informal training for workers at risk of automation," Ruhr Economic Papers 857, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    15. Sebastian Lago Raquel & Federico Biagi, 2018. "The Routine Biased Technical Change hypothesis: a critical review," JRC Research Reports JRC113174, Joint Research Centre.
    16. Tobias Maier, 2022. "Change in occupational tasks and its implications: evidence from a task panel from 1973 to 2011 for Western Germany," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 889-921, June.
    17. Arief A. Yusuf & Reza Anglingkusumo & Andy Sumner & Putri R. Halim & Anggita C.M. Kusuma, 2020. "Routinization And The Changing Task Composition In The Labor Market: Evidence From Indonesia," Working Papers WP/06/2020, Bank Indonesia.
    18. Larissa Bolliger & Junoš Lukan & Mitja Luštrek & Dirk De Bacquer & Els Clays, 2020. "Protocol of the STRess at Work (STRAW) Project: How to Disentangle Day-to-Day Occupational Stress among Academics Based on EMA, Physiological Data, and Smartphone Sensor and Usage Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Eduard Storm, 2023. "On the measurement of tasks: does expert data get it right?," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 57(1), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Mader, Xana & Santos, Joana & Gonçalves, Gabriela, 2018. "Job Satisfaction In A Tourist Resort In Portugal," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 6(3), pages 314-325.
    21. Serdar Çop & Victor Oluwafemi Olorunsola & Uju Violet Alola, 2021. "Achieving environmental sustainability through green transformational leadership policy: Can green team resilience help?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 671-682, January.
    22. Onintze Letona-Ibañez & Silvia Martinez-Rodriguez & Nuria Ortiz-Marques & Maria Carrasco & Alejandro Amillano, 2021. "Job Crafting and Work Engagement: The Mediating Role of Work Meaning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.