IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sid/wpaper/180.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

INDIA: Trade in Healthcare Services

Author

Listed:
  • T P Bhat

    (Institute for Studies in Industrial Development, New Delhi
    Institute for Studies in Industrial Development, New Delhi)

Abstract

During the last two decades international trade in healthcare services has expanded under the GATS. Increasingly it has acquired new dimensions with application of advanced information and communication technology, flow of foreign investment, cross-border mobility, rising income levels and demographics dynamics. India is one of the main participants in this process. Currently, India’s healthcare sector is growing at 20 per cent per annum. The government’s expenditure on healthcare is highly inadequate. It is also a low priority area. India is a participant in the GATS agreement. It has made binding commitments to minimize trade barriers. Trade liberalization is facilitated through four modes. Mode 1 represents cross border supply, mode 2 (consumption abroad), mode 3 (commercial presence) and mode 4 (presence of natural persons). In mode 3, the commitments to attract capital and skill are liberal. But it is more restrictive in mode 4. Modes 1 and 2 are subject to limitations. The developing countries have made more market access commitments in medical and dental services. Economic Needs Test (ENT) is also applied under mode 3 and mode 4. The GATS do not stipulate any constraints on terms and conditions, for example, on treatments of foreign patients. The parties are free to make any policy decisions. The Indian market segment is dominated by hospital business. Other activities include pharmaceuticals, medical equipment, insurance and diagnosis. India has emerged as a hub for clinical research and attracts patients from the US, the Middle East and South Asia. The low cost medical services have boosted medical tourism. However, all modes are not totally free. In modes 1 and 2 there are no national treatment and market access restrictions. In mode 3 foreign equity ceiling of 74 per cent remains. In mode 4 restrictions are on foreign personnel on entry visa basis. India has established superiority in IT-enabled and back-end services. India has built up reputation in offering specialist medical and surgical interventions at competitive prices under mode 2. The foreign investment under mode 3 is modest due to a variety of factors. Though India has an advantage in mode 4 but heavy restrictions prevent migration of health personnel. It also causes internal brain drain which results in denial of quality services to the poor domestic patients. Some efforts are made to rectify this problem but it is not successful. The earning of foreign exchange has taken priority. On the whole, India enjoys distinct advantages in modes 2 and 4.The global healthcare market is highly competitive. There is a need for export strategy. Such a strategy should be based on “niches and market prospects.” The bilateral and regional trade agreements should be made use of to derive market access in health services abroad.

Suggested Citation

  • T P Bhat, 2015. "INDIA: Trade in Healthcare Services," Working Papers 180, Institute for Studies in Industrial Development (ISID).
  • Handle: RePEc:sid:wpaper:180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://isid.org.in/pdf/WP180.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cattaneo, Olivier, 2009. "Trade in health services: what's in it for developing countries ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5115, The World Bank.
    2. Rupa Chanda, 2008. "Trade in Health Services," Working Papers id:1758, eSocialSciences.
    3. Dreze, Jean & Sen, Amartya, 2002. "India: Development and Participation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199257492.
    4. Richard Smith, 2008. "Globalization: the key challenge facing health economics in the 21st century," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(1), pages 1-3, January.
    5. Kausik Lahiri & Sarmila Banerjee, 2013. "India’s Health-care Sector under GATS: Inquiry into Backward and Forward Linkages," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 48(3), pages 285-357, August.
    6. David L. Levy, 2005. "Offshoring in the New Global Political Economy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 685-693, May.
    7. Arunanondchai, Jutamas & Fink, Carsten, 2007. "Trade in health services in the ASEAN region," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4147, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T.P. Bhat, 2015. "International Trade in Health Care Services: Prospects and Challenges for India," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 71(3), pages 239-254, September.
    2. Fahmida Khatun & Mazbahul Ahamad, 2015. "Liberalising trade in health services: constraints and prospects for South Asian countries," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 57-70, January.
    3. Smith, Richard & Martínez Álvarez, Melisa & Chanda, Rupa, 2011. "Medical tourism: A review of the literature and analysis of a role for bi-lateral trade," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 276-282.
    4. Biswajit Mandal & Soumyadip Chattopadhyay & Alaka Shree Prasad, 2019. "Effects of Trade Reform on Health and Tourism Sectors of the Reforming Country," Review of Market Integration, India Development Foundation, vol. 11(3), pages 176-189, December.
    5. Richard Smith, 2012. "Trade in Health Services: Current Challenges and Future Prospects of Globalization," Chapters, in: Andrew M. Jones (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Health Economics, Second Edition, chapter 16, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Angus Deaton & Jean Dreze, 2008. "Nutrition in India: Facts and Interpretations," Working Papers 1071, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Research Program in Development Studies..
    7. Sripad Motiram & Lars Osberg, 2010. "Gender Inequalities in Tasks and Instruction Opportunities within Indian Families," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 141-167.
    8. Rafaelita M. Aldaba & Gloria O. Pasadilla, 2010. "The ASEAN Services Sector and the Growth Rebalancing Model," Working Papers id:2922, eSocialSciences.
    9. Lukas, Daniel, 2009. "Efficiency effects of cross-border medical demand," Dresden Discussion Paper Series in Economics 15/09, Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Economics.
    10. Vizard, Polly, 2005. "The contributions of Professor Amartya Sen in the field of human rights," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6273, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Jia, Fu & Lamming, Richard & Sartor, Marco & Orzes, Guido & Nassimbeni, Guido, 2014. "Global purchasing strategy and International Purchasing Offices: Evidence from case studies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 284-298.
    12. Kristian Alm & David S. A. Guttormsen, 2023. "Enabling the Voices of Marginalized Groups of People in Theoretical Business Ethics Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(2), pages 303-320, January.
    13. Clots-Figueras, Irma, 2011. "Women in politics: Evidence from the Indian States," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7-8), pages 664-690, August.
    14. Lionel Kesztenbaum & Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, 2014. "Income versus Sanitation; Mortality Decline in Paris, 1880-1914," PSE Working Papers halshs-01018594, HAL.
    15. repec:kqi:journl:2018-2-1-2 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Gulati, Namrata & Ray, Tridip, 2016. "Inequality, neighbourhoods and welfare of the poor," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 214-228.
    17. Cassan, Guilhem, 2019. "Affirmative action, education and gender: Evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 51-70.
    18. Teresa Bago d'Uva & Maarten Lindeboom & Owen O'Donnell & Eddy van Doorslaer, 2011. "Education‐related inequity in healthcare with heterogeneous reporting of health," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 174(3), pages 639-664, July.
    19. Vuontisjärvi, Taru, 2013. "Argumentation and socially questionable business practices: The case of employee downsizing in corporate annual reports," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 292-313.
    20. Saon Ray & Smita Miglani, 2018. "Upgrading in the Indian automobile sector: The role of lead firms," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Working Paper 360, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.
    21. Williams, Christopher & van Triest, Sander, 2009. "The impact of corporate and national cultures on decentralization in multinational corporations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 156-167, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sid:wpaper:180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amitava Dey (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isidein.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.