IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/2804298.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact Assessment of the Social Demonstration Effect and Religiosity upon Charitable Spendings: Findings of a Cross Sectional Study in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Syed Toqueer Akhter

    (Lahore School of Economics)

  • Bilal Maqbool

    (Lahore School of Economics)

Abstract

The study attempts to find the extent to which the Social Demonstration Effect and Religiosity have an impact on the Charitable Spendings appearing in form of efforts towards poverty alleviation, providing financial transfers to internally displaced persons and as a response to disasters. Despite the fact that Pakistan is a developing nation, it possesses a strong culture of charitable giving which reflects high degree of concern for humanity among ordinary people in the country. This supports the government?s initial effort to drive social progress in Pakistan. In order to pretest the impact of Social Demonstration Effect and Religiosity a cross sectional foundation has been preferred and the sampling frame was based upon the estimates on income disparity and the segregation of income groups. The number of respondents from five different income groups was selected on the basis of income received by each group as suggested by the Lorentz curve for Pakistan. Important sections in the questionnaire include Religiosity, Spending for Humanity, Self-personal interest, Educational quality and Socio economic factors. Competing econometric models namely Ordinary Least Squares model, Weighted Least Squares and Median Regression have been estimated so that to consolidate the impact of Social Demonstration Effect and Religiosity upon Charitable Spendings comprehensively. Model estimates entail the Social Demonstration Effect present in the society, the impact of religious norms that mandate donations and the degree to which Tax concessions help generate funds for charity. Government regulations to introduce social awareness programs about the importance of charities in religion and their effect on the economic welfare of the country tends to be a viable option to generate more funds for charities.

Suggested Citation

  • Syed Toqueer Akhter & Bilal Maqbool, 2015. "The Impact Assessment of the Social Demonstration Effect and Religiosity upon Charitable Spendings: Findings of a Cross Sectional Study in Pakistan," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 2804298, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:2804298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/19th-international-academic-conference-florence/table-of-content/detail?cid=28&iid=003&rid=4298
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ken McCormick, 1983. "Duesenberry and Veblen: The Demonstration Effect Revisited," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 1125-1129, December.
    2. Arieh Gavious & Shlomo Mizrahi, 2001. "A continuous time model of the bandwagon effect in collective action," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 18(1), pages 91-105.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junpei Huang & Shanlang Lin & Xiaoli Hu & Ruofei Lin, 2022. "Are Sports Champions Also Anti-Epidemic Heroes? Quantitative Research on the Influence of Sports Champions’ Demonstration Effect on the COVID-19 Epidemic in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Chang Hoon Oh & Daniel Shapiro & Shuna Shu Ham Ho & Jiyoung Shin, 2020. "Location matters: Valuing firm‐specific nonmarket risk in the global mining industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(7), pages 1210-1244, July.
    3. Tazeb Bisset & Dagmawe Tenaw, 2022. "Keeping up with the Joneses: macro-evidence on the relevance of Duesenberry’s relative income hypothesis in Ethiopia," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 24(2), pages 549-564, December.
    4. Antinyan, Armenak & Horváth, Gergely & Jia, Mofei, 2019. "Social status competition and the impact of income inequality in evolving social networks: An agent-based model," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 53-69.
    5. Michael Ye & John Zyren & Carol Blumberg & Joanne Shore, 2009. "A Short-Run Crude Oil Price Forecast Model with Ratchet Effect," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 37(1), pages 37-50, March.
    6. Donald Bruce & Langchuan Peng, 2018. "Optimal taxation in the presence of income-dependent relative income effects," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(2), pages 313-335, August.
    7. Borooah, Vani, 2018. "Sanitation and Hygiene," MPRA Paper 90420, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Antinyan, Armenak & Baghdasaryan, Vardan & Grigoryan, Aleksandr, 2022. "Charitable giving, social capital, and positional concerns," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Ken McCormick, 2018. "James Duesenberry as a practitioner of behavioral economics," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 2(1), pages 13-18, March.
    10. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2010. "The history of the mainstream rejection of interdependent preferences," MPRA Paper 23980, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Inchan Yang, 2020. "When Numbers Make Laws: A Study of the Effect of Social Movements on Legislative Action and Related Concerns," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 12(1), pages 265-276, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Charitable spending; Social demonstration effect; Religiosity; Weighted Least Squares model; Median Regression.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:2804298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.