IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sec/cnstan/0077.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fiscal Consolidation in Central Europe in Preparation for Accession to the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Lucjan T. Orlowski

Abstract

This paper focuses on adjustments in fiscal policy in five CEC’s whose accession seems to be politically most feasible, and who have expressed the strongest desire to join the Union. They include: Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, and Slovenia. Fiscal consolidation in these countries is very critical in the process of preparations for accession to the EU. These countries will have to undergo major reforms of tax laws and they have to further develop efficient institutions of government revenue collection. The governments will have to significantly alter their major expenditure positions as well. These CEC’s are all implementing the program of transformation from central planning and state ownership into deregulated, competitive economic structures with private ownership. The ultimate goal of this transformation is minimization of state ownership, state financing and state regulatory interference with business to reasonable levels comparable to modern economies of industrial nations. In essence, this transformation shall be based on a sizable contraction of the state sector to ensure compatibility with the fiscal and regulatory system of the EU nations and to narrow the efficiency gap between the West and the East. Consequently, the task of their fiscal convergence shall be very ambitious. Because the ongoing economic transformation is so closely tied to the contraction of the government intervention with business in CEC’s, it is proposed that at the end of the pre-accession period the candidate countries of Central Europe shall not exceed a 3 per cent budget deficit-to-GDP ratio, right at the level consistent with the Maastricht convergence criteria for inclusion in the European Monetary System. Moreover, even a tighter criterion of no more than 2 per cent shall be recommended for CEC’s since a 3 per cent annul deficit in relation to GDP is still quite significant. However, a tighter deviation from the Maastricht convergence criteria will be politically unjust, it may send a discriminatory message to the candidate countries. The fiscal convergence criterion required in preparations for accession to the EU shall be constitutionally guaranteed in CEC’s and simultaneously announced to the public as a criterion of a "balanced budget" national economic strategy. At the same time, a 60 per cent maximum allowed ratio of public debt-to-GDP shall be applied as a supplementary fiscal convergence measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucjan T. Orlowski, 1996. "Fiscal Consolidation in Central Europe in Preparation for Accession to the European Union," CASE Network Studies and Analyses 0077, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:sec:cnstan:0077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://case-research.eu/upload/publikacja_plik/4803759_077.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucjan T Orlowski, 1995. "Social Safety Nets in Central Europe: Preparation for Accession to the European Union?," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 37(2), pages 29-48, July.
    2. Schaffer, Mark E, 1995. "Government Subsidies to Enterprises in Central and Eastern Europe: Budgetary Subsidies and Tax Arrears," CEPR Discussion Papers 1144, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Lucjan T. Orlowski, 1995. "Preparations of the Visegrad Group countries for admission to the European Union: monetary policy aspects," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 3(3), pages 333-353, September.
    4. Kornai, Janos, 1992. "The Postsocialist Transition and the State: Reflections in the Light of Hungarian Fiscal Problems," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(2), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Gros, D. & Steinherr, A., 1991. "Economic Reform in the Soviet Union: Pas de deux Between Disintegration and Macroeconomic Destabilization," Princeton Studies in International Economics 71, International Economics Section, Departement of Economics Princeton University,.
    6. Luca Barbone & Domenico Marchetti, 1995. "Transition and the fiscal crisis in Central Europe," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 3(1), pages 59-74, March.
    7. Mr. Vito Tanzi, 1993. "Fiscal Policy and the Economic Restructuring of Economies in Transition," IMF Working Papers 1993/022, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tausch, Arno, 2009. "Ist die Globalisierung fit für das soziale Europa? [Is Globalization fit for Social Europe?]," MPRA Paper 14264, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Barbone & Hana Polackova, 1996. "Public Finances and Economic Transition," CASE Network Studies and Analyses 0068, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
    2. Chadha, Bankim & Coricelli, Fabrizio, 1997. "Fiscal constraints and the speed of transition," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 221-249, February.
    3. Denizer, Cevdet & Desai, Raj M. & Gueorguiev, Nikolay, 1998. "The political economy of financial repression in transition economies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2030, The World Bank.
    4. Dittus, Peter, 1996. "Why East European banks don't want equity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-5), pages 655-662, April.
    5. Wifo, 2019. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 12/2019," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 92(12), December.
    6. Pursey Heugens & Stelios Zyglidopoulos, 2008. "From social ties to embedded competencies: the case of business groups," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(4), pages 325-341, November.
    7. repec:ilo:ilowps:298738 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Shumei Gao and Mark E. Schaffer & Shumei Gao and Mark E. Schaffer, 1998. "Financial Discipline in the Enterprise Sector in Transition Countries: How Does China Compare?," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 124, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    9. Schmieding, Holger & Buch, Claudia, 1992. "Better banks for Eastern Europe," Kiel Discussion Papers 197, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    10. Klaus Friesenbichler & Michael Peneder, 2016. "Innovation, competition and productivity," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 24(3), pages 535-580, July.
    11. Michael H. Böheim & Klaus S. Friesenbichler, 2016. "Exporting the Competition Policy Regime of the European Union: Success or Failure? Empirical Evidence for Acceding Countries," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 569-582, May.
    12. Bruszt, László & Stark, David, 1996. "Vállalatközi tulajdonosi hálózatok a kelet-európai kapitalizmusban [Inter-enterprise ownership networks in the East European capitalism]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 183-203.
    13. Lucjan T. Orlowski, 1995. "Recent Developments in International Currency Derivatives Market: Implications for Poland," CASE Network Studies and Analyses 0055, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
    14. Vagliasindi, Maria, 2004. "The role of investment and regulatory reforms in the development of infrastructure across transition economies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 303-314, December.
    15. Klaus Friesenbichler, 2014. "EU Accession, Domestic Market Competition and Total Factor Productivity. Firm Level Evidence," WIFO Working Papers 492, WIFO.
    16. Rao, B. Bhaskara & Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya, 2011. "Globalization and growth in the low income African countries with the extreme bounds analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 795-805, May.
    17. Heinrich, Ralph P., 1993. "Microeconomic adjustment in Hungary: Results from a survey of enterprises," Kiel Working Papers 599, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    18. Daniel Munich & Jan Svejnar & Katherine Terrell, 2001. "Worker-firm Matching and Unemployment in Transition to a Market," Development and Comp Systems 0012011, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. P. Kiss, Gábor, 2002. "A fiskális jelzőszámok új megközelítésben [A new approach to fiscal index numbers]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 292-319.
    20. György, László & Veress, József, 2013. "The Possible Causes of and Means of Avoiding External Financial Vulnerability – Hungary versus Singapore," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 58(1), pages 53-75.
    21. Munich, Daniel & Svejnar, Jan, 2009. "Unemployment and Worker-Firm Matching Theory and Evidence from East and West Europe," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4810, The World Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sec:cnstan:0077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Budzynska (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caseepl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.