IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sce/scecf0/63.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Computational Approach On Neighbourhood Structures In The Simulation Of Dichotomous Development

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Resta

    (Facolt di Economia, Universit di Genova)

Abstract

In this paper the issue of dichotomous growth and development is addressed by means of computer simulation. As previously remarked by many authors (see for example Marengo and Willinger [5], or McCain [6]), computer simulation is a key technique to model economic dynamics. The specific application of this study comes out from considerations related to the field of evolutionary economics. At the first corner of the ring we find the intuition of Kirman [2] which emphasises the importance of viewing to economy as an evolving network. In this context interaction is viewed as a leading aspect in modern economy, where individual behaviour arises as a synthesis of both previous personal experience and partnership effects. Although many different paths may be followed to approach this topic, this paper addresses to the specific field of simulations of interaction among individuals by means of spatial connections.In particular, we explore the emergence of dichotomous growth, when the spatial distribution is simulated through of connectivity structures well-known to topology representation theory and strictly related to the approach of self-organisation in neural models [3], [4]. The simulations have been performed starting from the two sector growth model suggested in McCain [6] with a few modification. As in McCain [6], we consider an overlapping generation system, where each individual lives for two periods. At each step the agent chooses how to allocate potential labour between work and study, and hence how to divide wages between consumption and savings which will be invested in physical capital to be used in the second part of his life. The production function for tangible goods is given by a Cobb-Douglas function: Q=(L K H)^1/3 Where, Q,L,K, and H are, respectively, production, labour services, tangible and human capital. New generations acquire from the old one previous situation with changes induced by learning and neighbourhood effects. Our efforts have been concentrated in the task of modelling such learning and neighbourhood effects. Our contribution stands primarily in the fact that in our model spatial connections affect not only the level of human capital available (and hence production), but also propensity to save as well as propensity to study. The following rules have been adopted: - at each step, two leaders (cell) of the process emerge as individuals who have shown, respectively, better rate of production and allocation of wages. Hence each cell will set its operative rules and modify previous strategy by taking into account emerging leaders of the step as well as spatial distance from them according to a smoothing function as the one below: f [ (i,j), l, csi,] = Exp[-csi d(l,(i,j))] where (ij) is the position of individual in the grid, l is the position of leader, csi is a positive constant arbitrarily chosen in (0,1), and finally d(l,(i,j)) is a proper metrics which computes the distance between the leader and the cell under examination.-The leaders in turn will change their previous rules by perturbing them by a random factor.The model is studied by adopting both a classical cross neighbourhood with various radius amplitudes and various clique typologies [1]. All the simulations have been implemented using Wolfram's Mathematica.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Resta, 2000. "A Computational Approach On Neighbourhood Structures In The Simulation Of Dichotomous Development," Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 63, Society for Computational Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf0:63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/cef00/papers/paper63.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan Kirman, 1997. "The economy as an evolving network," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 339-353.
    2. Roger A. McCain, 1999. "Backwash and Spread: Effects of Trade Networks in a Space of Agents who Learn by Doing," Computing in Economics and Finance 1999 542, Society for Computational Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giorgio Fagiolo & Marco Valente, 2005. "Minority Games, Local Interactions, and Endogenous Networks," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 41-57, February.
    2. Gordon, Mirta B. & Nadal, Jean-Pierre & Phan, Denis & Vannimenus, Jean, 2005. "Seller's dilemma due to social interactions between customers," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 356(2), pages 628-640.
    3. Franck Galtier & François Bousquet & Martine Antona & Pierre Bommel, 2012. "Markets as communication systems," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 161-201, January.
    4. Gary Charness & Francesco Feri & Miguel A. Meléndez‐Jiménez & Matthias Sutter, 2014. "Experimental Games on Networks: Underpinnings of Behavior and Equilibrium Selection," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82, pages 1615-1670, September.
    5. Yoguel, Gabriel & Brixner, Cristián & Lerena, Octavio & Minervini, Mariana, 2021. "The relationship between universities and business: identification of thematic communities," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    6. Sanjeev Goyal & Fernando Vega-Redondo, 2000. "Learning, Network Formation and Coordination," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 00-093/1, Tinbergen Institute.
    7. A. Arrighetti & S. Curatolo, 2010. "Costi di coordinamento e vantaggi di aggregazione: esiti, morfologia e processi di interazione in un mondo artificiale multi-agente," Economics Department Working Papers 2010-EP01, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    8. Sandoval, Leonidas Junior, 2013. "To lag or not to lag? How to compare indices of stock markets that operate at different times," Insper Working Papers wpe_319, Insper Working Paper, Insper Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa.
    9. Francesco Feri & Miguel Meléndez-Jiménez, 2013. "Coordination in evolving networks with endogenous decay," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 955-1000, November.
    10. Evstigneev, Igor & Taksar, Michael, 2009. "Dynamic interaction models of economic equilibrium," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 166-182, January.
    11. Joanna Tyrowicz & Krzysztof Makarski & Marcin Bielecki, 2018. "Inequality in an OLG economy with heterogeneous cohorts and pension systems," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 16(4), pages 583-606, December.
    12. Garavaglia, Christian, 2010. "Modelling industrial dynamics with "History-friendly" simulations," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 258-275, November.
    13. Giorgio Fagiolo & Luigi Marengo & Marco Valente, 2004. "Endogenous Networks In Random Population Games," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 121-147.
    14. Jean Pierre Nadal & Denis Phan & Mirta B. Gordan & Jean Vannimenus, 2003. "Monopoly Market with Externality: an Analysis with Statistical Physics and ACE," Computational Economics 0312002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Marcello Montefiori & Marina Resta, 2009. "A computational approach for the health care market," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 344-350, December.
    16. Paolo Bartesaghi & Michele Benzi & Gian Paolo Clemente & Rosanna Grassi & Ernesto Estrada, 2019. "Risk-dependent centrality in economic and financial networks," Papers 1907.07908, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    17. Laura Hernandez & Annick Vignes & Stéphanie Saba, 2018. "Trust or robustness? An ecological approach to the study of auction and bilateral markets," Post-Print hal-02005040, HAL.
    18. Frank Schweitzer & Giorgio Fagiolo & Didier Sornette & Fernando Vega-Redondo & Douglas R. White, 2009. "Economic Networks: What Do We Know And What Do We Need To Know?," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(04n05), pages 407-422.
    19. Matthew O. Jackson, 2002. "The Stability and Efficiency of Economic and Social Networks," Microeconomics 0211011, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Evangelos Ioannidis & Nikos Varsakelis & Ioannis Antoniou, 2021. "Intelligent Agents in Co-Evolving Knowledge Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf0:63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sceeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.