IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/12-808.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Choosing the right business process maturity model

Author

Listed:
  • A. VAN LOOY
  • M. DE BACKER
  • G. POELS
  • M. SNOECK

Abstract

Business processes (e.g. supply chains) are at the heart of organisations by describing their way of working. Globalisation, higher competitiveness, more demanding customers, growing IT possibilities, etc.; all those challenges put pressure on organisations to perform better, and thus to obtain mature (or excellent) business processes. Consequently, many business process maturity models (BPMMs) exist to gradually assess and improve business processes. Although their aim is to assist organisations, their proliferation also confuses organisations. Organisations have no overview of existing BPMMs and their differences, which makes an informed choice (i.e. conform to decision-making theories) difficult. Therefore, this article elaborates on decision criteria to choose a BPMM that fits organisational needs. Particularly, an online decision tool (called ‘BPMM Smart-Selector’) was built and tested. 14 decision criteria were identified by a content analysis on a large sample (N=69 BPMMs) and an international Delphi study (N=22 experts). They were weighed by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process, and summarised in a decision table. Thoroughly considering BPMM selection pays off by saving money and efforts afterwards. Consequently, the BPMM Smart- Selector is paramount for managers trying to excel, and for scholars applying BPMMs in their research. Besides tool development, this article intends to build a theory (i.e. a design process or methodology) for building BPMM decision tools.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Van Looy & M. De Backer & G. Poels & M. Snoeck, 2012. "Choosing the right business process maturity model," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 12/808, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:12/808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_12_808.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Remco Dijkman & Sander Vincent Lammers & Ad Jong, 2016. "Properties that influence business process management maturity and its effect on organizational performance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 717-734, August.
    2. Ma³gorzata Okrêglicka & Monika Mynarzova & Radomir Kana, 2015. "Business Process Maturity In Small And Mediumsized Enterprises," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 12(1), pages 121-131, DEcember.
    3. Maciejczak, Mariusz, 2014. "Process Maturity Of Short Food Supply Chains," Journal of Central European Green Innovation, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 2(4), pages 1-15.
    4. Enrique Mu & Howard Stern, 2018. "A Contingent/Assimilation Framework for Public Interorganizational Systems Decisions: Should the City of Pittsburgh and Allegheny County Consolidate Information Technology Services?," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(06), pages 1611-1658, November.
    5. Banta Viorel Costin, 2020. "Sap And Rpa Implementation In Production Area - Risks During The Pandemic Periode. A Case Study," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 118-123, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:12/808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nathalie Verhaeghe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.