IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rsc/rsceui/2023-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Beyond the Battle of Narratives: Global soft power dynamics and the EU’s strategic approach on international cultural relations in the context of the emerging new world order

Author

Listed:
  • Tamas Szucs

Abstract

This paper argues that global soft power dynamics and the key actors’ behaviour in the battle ofnarratives positions the EU’s strategic approach on international cultural relations beyond this battle.Even though this approach originally counted on a well-functioning liberal democracy guided bythe rule of law, its open and inclusive nature complemented by its readiness to engage in dialogueand focus on the relational process aiming to build trust renders it a useful asset in the emergingmultipolar world.For the success of the EU approach collaborative partners are essential and their level of genuineengagement matters. At the positive end of the global spectrum are the democracies of the GlobalWest and Ukraine, while its war of aggression put Russia firmly on the opposite end. Russia`ssoft power has in fact (almost) always been reliant on the instrumentalisation of culture, clearlyattempting to disrupt the exisiting system of international relations and to reconstruct the Cold Warerabalance of power politics, dividing the world into spheres of influence. Russia’s soft coercionefforts are pivotal in its colonial war aimed at the destruction of not just the Ukrainian state, but alsoof Ukraine’s national and cultural identity, language and history.Ukraine’s response to this “weaponisation of cultural identity” was the direct opposite of Russia`sapproach. With active EU support, a full scale cultural renewal embraced democratic values,butressing Ukraine’s Western orientation and contributing to a wider societal transformation thatreinforces its anti-colonial resistance. China presents a conundrum. Its huge cultural potential andexceptional global significance make a strong case for the EU to develop a specific cultural relationsstrategy with the Asian superpower. On the other hand, China’s regular interference with culturalfreedom within Europe, its internal restrictions on artistic freedom, cultural and religious rights aswell as its increasing alliance with Russia on Ukraine and on disrupting the current rules based worldorder renders this difficult to envisage.Given such a scenario, combined with the importance of trust building, dialogue, co-creation, andseeking equity and fairness to address collective challenges in cultural relations, the Global Southholds the biggest potential for a reinforced implementation of the EU strategic approach. In the GlobalSouth, the EU is generally seen as an attractive and “capable actor,” performing well in culture andsport in particular. It is already actively engaged in cultural co-creation and intercultural dialoguewith many countries, and supports initiatives to protect and promote cultural heritage, successfulEuropean Spaces of Culture projects have been rolling out on all continents (except Australia) since2019.My paper contends that a reinforced cultural relations approach, complemented by conventionalforms of cultural diplomacy and public diplomacy, should be used in a balanced manner. This wouldrequire targeted, concrete flagship projects in each domain with “differentiated implementation”,adjusted to specific needs with full involvement of local actors and stakeholders. This could improvecoordination among institutional actors. Such an approach also implies moving beyond the rigidapplication of conceptual approaches, as instead of competing with other methods, this new multifactorapproach would offer a scale of choices for concrete actions on the ground which would beadapted to local circumstances. Engaging in genuine dialogue, meaningful co-creation and mutuallybeneficial collaboration with local partners resonates well not just with the basic principles of thecultural relations approach. It also meets the clear message coming from the Global South in thewake of Russia`s war and their search for their own place in the new world power constellation. Thecountries of the Global South are diverse, have their own histories and identities, and are rejectinggeopolitical binaries in favour of multi-alignment and interest-based dialogues. The EU and its Member States, acting collectively, have by far the largest cultural network to engage effectively in third countries across the globe in terms of reinforced cultural relations approach, conventional forms of cultural diplomacy, and public diplomacy. The paradigm shift in international relations due to the Russian invasion and due to the way culture is used by other prominent global actors would fully justify continuing the implementation of the Joint Communication with high ambitions. This implementation should be based on a coherent vision in terms of the overall objectives of the EU`s international cultural relations approach, supported with strong political commitment, leadership, and personal involvement from the top level of EU institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamas Szucs, 2023. "Beyond the Battle of Narratives: Global soft power dynamics and the EU’s strategic approach on international cultural relations in the context of the emerging new world order," RSCAS Working Papers 2023/46, European University Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2023/46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/75787/RSC_WP_2023_46.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/1814/75787
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, MinHyu & Li, Huafang & Holzer, Marc & Zhang, Mengzhong, 2019. "Public Administration Research in Mainland China," OSF Preprints zvxeu, Center for Open Science.
    2. YU,Haitian & ZHENG,Aiqing & LU,Meiyuan & YANG,Feng & HU,Chaoqin & YANG,Xin & HE,Yuhua & WANG,Liping, 2019. "Research Advances in Functional Constituents of Chickpea," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 11(04), April.
    3. LIU,Yang & ZHONG,Xiangtao & CHEN,Guanming & LIU,Guomin & CHEN,Meipeng & LI,Hongyang, 2019. "Research Progress of Adansonia digitata," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 11(01), January.
    4. Jian Li & Alan Paisey, 2019. "Research and Development in Beijing," Springer Books, in: Transfer Pricing in China, chapter 0, pages 145-147, Springer.
    5. Paul J. J. Welfens, 2022. "Russia's Invasion of Ukraine," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-031-19138-1, June.
    6. Tóth, Zsófia & Dul, Jan & Li, Chunxiao (Spring), 2019. "Necessary condition analysis in tourism research," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Dorokhina K. & Ignatov Alexander & Larionova Marina & Popova Irina & Sakharov Andrey & Shelepov Andrey, 2023. "Russia in international institutes in 2022," Published Papers ppaper-2023-1293, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, revised 2023.
    8. Omar E.M. Khalil & Nadia Khalil, 2019. "Business research productivity and barriers," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(1), pages 34-57.
    9. Yanwei Wang & Chinenye Gerlof Uzodinma & Caoyuan Niu, 2021. "The path, value and limits of the Confucius Institute in carrying out public diplomacy," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 217-229, April.
    10. Song, Haiyan & Qiu, Richard T.R. & Park, Jinah, 2019. "A review of research on tourism demand forecasting," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 338-362.
    11. Dai Yuan Li & Cong Wei Xie & Shu Hao Chen & Xiu Xiang Zou, 2019. "Research on the Pricing of Shared Ownership Housing," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 30-44, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eren Demir & Shola Adeyemi & Andre Pascal Kengne & Gbenga A. Kayode & Adekunle Adeoti, 2021. "HIV‐MSS: A user‐friendly management support system for better planning of HIV care services," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1847-1860, September.
    2. Doris Chenguang Wu & Shiteng Zhong & Richard T R Qiu & Ji Wu, 2022. "Are customer reviews just reviews? Hotel forecasting using sentiment analysis," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(3), pages 795-816, May.
    3. Nicholas Apergis & Konstantinos Gavriilidis & Rangan Gupta, 2023. "Does climate policy uncertainty affect tourism demand? Evidence from time-varying causality tests," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(6), pages 1484-1498, September.
    4. Xueying Huang & Yuanjun Han & Xuhong Gong & Xiangyan Liu, 2020. "Does the belt and road initiative stimulate China’s inbound tourist market? An empirical study using the gravity model with a DID method," Tourism Economics, , vol. 26(2), pages 299-323, March.
    5. Zhang, Yishuo & Li, Gang & Muskat, Birgit & Law, Rob & Yang, Yating, 2020. "Group pooling for deep tourism demand forecasting," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Li, Huafang, 2020. "Public Administration Research in Mainland China: An Update," OSF Preprints 7brjd, Center for Open Science.
    7. Guizzardi, Andrea & Pons, Flavio Maria Emanuele & Angelini, Giovanni & Ranieri, Ercolino, 2021. "Big data from dynamic pricing: A smart approach to tourism demand forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1049-1060.
    8. Kaijian He & Don Wu & Yingchao Zou, 2022. "Tourist Arrival Forecasting Using Multiscale Mode Learning Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-12, August.
    9. Han Liu & Yongjing Wang & Haiyan Song & Ying Liu, 2023. "Measuring tourism demand nowcasting performance using a monotonicity test," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(5), pages 1302-1327, August.
    10. Llano, Carlos & Pardo, Juan & Pérez-Balsalobre, Santiago & Pérez, Julián, 2023. "Estimating multicountry tourism flows by transport mode," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Gonzalo Armienta [y otros] & Eric Tremolada Álvarez (editor) Author-Email, 2020. "Conjuntos geopolíticos, regionalización y procesos de integración en el siglo XXI," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1215, November.
    12. Xi Wu & Adam Blake, 2023. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on Air Travel Demand: Some Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, January.
    13. Yi-Chung Hu & Peng Jiang & Jung-Fa Tsai & Ching-Ying Yu, 2021. "An Optimized Fractional Grey Prediction Model for Carbon Dioxide Emissions Forecasting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-12, January.
    14. Chanin Yoopetch & Boonying Kongarchapatara & Suthep Nimsai, 2022. "Tourism Forecasting Using the Delphi Method and Implications for Sustainable Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Chengyuan Zhang & Fuxin Jiang & Shouyang Wang & Shaolong Sun, 2020. "A New Decomposition Ensemble Approach for Tourism Demand Forecasting: Evidence from Major Source Countries," Papers 2002.09201, arXiv.org.
    16. Leiv Opstad & Randi Hammervold & Johannes Idsø, 2021. "The Influence of Income and Currency Changes on Tourist Inflow to Norwegian Campsites: The Case of Swedish and German Visitors," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Luojia Wang & Kerui Du & Bin Fang & Rob Law, 2023. "Escape from air pollution: How does air quality in the place of residence shape tourism consumption?," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(4), pages 1074-1099, June.
    18. Davide Provenzano & Serena Volo, 2022. "Tourism recovery amid COVID-19: The case of Lombardy, Italy," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(1), pages 110-130, February.
    19. Wanvilai Chulaphan & Jorge Fidel Barahona, 2021. "The Determinants of Tourist Expenditure Per Capita in Thailand: Potential Implications for Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    20. Jaume Rosselló Nadal & María Santana Gallego, 2022. "Gravity models for tourism demand modeling: Empirical review and outlook," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1358-1409, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2023/46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RSCAS web unit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rsiueit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.