IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/061812.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of Actual Discussions in the Theory of Action and Practices: Skeptical vs Anti-Skeptic Trends in Conceptualization
[Анализ Актуальных Дискуссий В Теории Действия И Практик: Скептицистские Vs Антискептицистские Направления Концептуализации]

Author

Listed:
  • Vakhshtayn, Victor (Вахштайн, Виктор)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Erofeeva, Maria (Ерофеева, Мария)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

Abstract

In this paper we analyze the problem of the social action and its Wittgenstein re-definition. These questions are of fundamental importance to the social theory because they allow us to redefine the basic concept underlying a significant part of the sociological conceptualizations: that is the concept of social action. In the framework of this paper, we propose to consider the skeptical paradox originally formulated by S. Kripke, as applied to modern theories of action. We propose its solutions, based on the ethnomethodological reading of the paradox, which allows us to redefine the subjective subject matter underlying most theoretical approaches to action.

Suggested Citation

  • Vakhshtayn, Victor (Вахштайн, Виктор) & Erofeeva, Maria (Ерофеева, Мария), 2018. "Analysis of Actual Discussions in the Theory of Action and Practices: Skeptical vs Anti-Skeptic Trends in Conceptualization [Анализ Актуальных Дискуссий В Теории Действия И Практик: Скептицистские ," Working Papers 061812, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:061812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/061812.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W.J. McKibbin, 1980. "Macroeconometric Models of the Australian Economy: A Comparative Analysis," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp8001, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    2. World Bank, 2011. "Botswana - Accrual Accounting Policy Note and Guide," World Bank Publications - Reports 12322, The World Bank Group.
    3. Robert H. Dugger, 2013. "Success begins with a feasibility study," Community Development Innovation Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue 01, pages 085-089.
    4. Patterson, Paul M. & Acharya, Ram N. & Schmitz, Troy G. & Foerster, Susan B. & Hill, Esther & Jones, Anita & Bohm, Erica, 2002. "Analysis of the Effects of a Healthy Dining Campaign on Sales of Healthy Menu Items," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19892, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. W. J. McKIBBIN, 1982. "A Comparison of Four Macroeconometric Models of the Australian Economy," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 58(3), pages 263-282, September.
    2. Stewart, Hayden & Yen, Steven T., 2004. "Changing household characteristics and the away-from-home food market: a censored equation system approach," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 643-658, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:061812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.